Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-10-2021, 11:39 AM   #3981
Lanny_McDonald
Franchise Player
 
Lanny_McDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heavy Jack View Post
Jfresh is on board

When healthy…

Gaudreau - Eichel - Tkachuk
Mangiapane - Lindholm - Coleman
Dube - Backlund - Pitlick
Lucic - Lewis - Richardson
Duehr, Gawdin, Ritchie

My god that’s a crazy deep top 9

Monahan + Valimaki + Pelletier + 22 1st (top 3 protected) gets it done?
The author of the article hits it right on the nose in regards to impact of an Eichel trade. If Eichel comes to Calgary it is going to cost the team two of their current top six, because of budget. You are not going to see a lineup with Gaudreau, Eichel, and Tkachuk in it. The Flames won't be able to afford it. You can't spend more than 1/3 of your budget on your top line and think you are going to be competitive. Gaudreau will be a $9-9.5M player when he signs his next deal. Tkachuk will be the same, possibly higher if he produces this season. So one of those two has to go just to keep the budget under control, because you're taking on another $3 million plus bringing Eichel in. The Flames need significant upgrades elsewhere, so they will have to keep that in mind. Hopefully they can flip the one salary that doesn't fit and fill the gaps, because the players used to get Eichel will create an even larger hole in our existing system. It is a huge gamble, but I can see why people would want to take the risk. The hope of having a supposedly elite player would be nice to have when you watch a game rather than what we have been subjected to over the past few years.
Lanny_McDonald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2021, 11:44 AM   #3982
Heavy Jack
Franchise Player
 
Heavy Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: In the studio
Exp:
Default

^^^ you can for this year and then flip Tkachuk for futures next. BT might just do it too as he’s in a position to have to push all in. This would be that move. Add to that the flexibility the flames will gain from having Jack on LTIR… maybe Buffalo even retains on Eichel to facilitate another future?? It’s not so cut and dry and we shouldn’t confuse this years cap with next years cap.
Heavy Jack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2021, 11:44 AM   #3983
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

If the Flames use Monahan as the main cap dump in the Eichel trade they can go all in for this year before they would need to move on from Tkachuk or Johnny. With Tkachuk still having his rights owned he could be flipped for futures next summer for sure.

This roster minus Monahan should be able to be in the mix until Eichel would be ready to join for the stretch drive. They get one run with Gaudreau-Eichel-Tkachuk and then one of those wingers is gone.
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Vinny01 For This Useful Post:
Old 10-10-2021, 11:47 AM   #3984
Wish They Could Win
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

The regular season starts Tuesday. Trading for an Eichel on LTIR on Tuesday becomes much easier as you don’t have to fit his salary into the cap structure of your team until he comes back. So theoretically you don’t have to trade Monahan or another big ticket forward for 4-5 months.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Wish They Could Win is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Wish They Could Win For This Useful Post:
Old 10-10-2021, 11:48 AM   #3985
Scroopy Noopers
Pent-up
 
Scroopy Noopers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Plutanamo Bay.
Exp:
Default

If an unsigned Tkachuk is traded I’ll lose my mind. Talk about selling for the lowest possible return.
Scroopy Noopers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2021, 11:49 AM   #3986
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scroopy Noopers View Post
If an unsigned Tkachuk is traded I’ll lose my mind. Talk about selling for the lowest possible return.
How is that the case? If he has a massive bounce back year he will have more value than he did this summer coming off a bad season?

Unsigned RFA’s have a ton of value when they are star players
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2021, 11:51 AM   #3987
Scroopy Noopers
Pent-up
 
Scroopy Noopers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Plutanamo Bay.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
How is that the case? If he has a massive bounce back year he will have more value than he did this summer coming off a bad season?

Unsigned RFA’s have a ton of value when they are star players
I can’t think of an example but I’ll gladly be proven wrong.
Scroopy Noopers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2021, 12:05 PM   #3988
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scroopy Noopers View Post
I can’t think of an example but I’ll gladly be proven wrong.
Treliving’s biggest moves were acquiring high profile RFA’s. Hamilton,
Lindholm and Hanifin. Kessel to the Leafs is another famous example
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Vinny01 For This Useful Post:
Old 10-10-2021, 12:09 PM   #3989
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Lucic is gonna retire after this season...Flames can keep the band together with Eichel IMO
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2021, 12:15 PM   #3990
Dude Where's Makar?
Backup Goalie
 
Dude Where's Makar?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heavy Jack View Post
Jfresh is on board

When healthy…

Gaudreau - Eichel - Tkachuk
Mangiapane - Lindholm - Coleman
Dube - Backlund - Pitlick
Lucic - Lewis - Richardson
Duehr, Gawdin, Ritchie

My god that’s a crazy deep top 9

Monahan + Valimaki + Pelletier + 22 1st (top 3 protected) gets it done?
The only piece Calgary would need is a minute munching mobile LHD imo to be a true contender.

Lindholm or Ekholm fit the bill. (stupid cap)
Dude Where's Makar? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2021, 12:20 PM   #3991
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
Lucic is gonna retire after this season...Flames can keep the band together with Eichel IMO
Interesting thought.

Next season his salary is only $1,000,000. He has a signing bonus of $3,000,000 though. I assume that bonus is paid out on July 1st, can he take it and then retire afterwards but before the season starts? He'd only be forfeiting the $1,000,000 then.
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2021, 12:29 PM   #3992
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Yep, I think he might...I shouldn't have stated it as a fact. They could probably move him too considering the cap hit vs. actual salary.

If it looks like he will be eating popcorn I can't imagine him sticking around for 1M. He almost retired once already.
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2021, 12:41 PM   #3993
Saqe
#1 Goaltender
 
Saqe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Exp:
Default

The proposed deal here makes sense for the Flames and maybe for Buffalo, even if they just flip Monahan. But for Monahan? It seems like the worst career move at this point for him to go to that dumpster fire team. He's soon to UFA and needs to maximize his value and going to Buffalo is the opposite. Who would he even play with? They just traded away Reinhart too. I just can't think of a single good reason for him to waive there so not holding my breath.
Saqe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2021, 01:02 PM   #3994
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

You look no further than the Duchene blockbuster for the Avs. Colorado had no need for Turris but they were able to get Turris to commit to an extension with a win now team in Nashville and then get Girard and a 2nd routed to the Avs.

Buffalo would be in a spot where they could retain on Monahan and find a home for him at $3.2M somewhere like Vegas, Boston, Chicago, Seattle Islanders, Ottawa (wouldn’t even need retention)
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Vinny01 For This Useful Post:
Old 10-10-2021, 01:12 PM   #3995
AC
Resident Videologist
 
AC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wish They Could Win View Post
The regular season starts Tuesday. Trading for an Eichel on LTIR on Tuesday becomes much easier as you don’t have to fit his salary into the cap structure of your team until he comes back. So theoretically you don’t have to trade Monahan or another big ticket forward for 4-5 months.
This is maybe the most interesting possibility. The Flames season starts on the 16th, so if Buffalo puts Eichel on LTIR we could trade futures almost exclusively while holding onto Monahan in the meantime. We'd be talking multiple 1sts and recent 1st round picks then.

That doesn't decimate our roster for an injured player, and gives us the ability to make a salary trade later closer to an Eichel return date post surgery. You could recoup a 1st for Monahan at least.

Now the big question is can Buffalo even put him on LTIR or does that drop them down below the cap floor?
AC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2021, 01:14 PM   #3996
ComixZone
Franchise Player
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AC View Post
This is maybe the most interesting possibility. The Flames season starts on the 16th, so if Buffalo puts Eichel on LTIR we could trade futures almost exclusively while holding onto Monahan in the meantime. That doesn't decimate our roster for an injured player, and gives us the ability to make a salary trade later closer to an Eichel return date post surgery.

Now the big question is can Buffalo even put him on LTIR or does that drop them down below the cap floor?
Does “tagging” cap-space come into effect in this scenario? Where the Flames would have too much money committed for the 22/23 season?

*just checked, clearly not. Even just adding straight $10M it still
Leaves the Flames with ample space in 22/23*
ComixZone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2021, 01:16 PM   #3997
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wish They Could Win View Post
The regular season starts Tuesday. Trading for an Eichel on LTIR on Tuesday becomes much easier as you don’t have to fit his salary into the cap structure of your team until he comes back. So theoretically you don’t have to trade Monahan or another big ticket forward for 4-5 months.
I'm pretty sure it doesn't work that way. Your roster has to be cap compliant before you put a player on LTIR. Also, Buffalo won't be putting Eichel on LTIR because they're nowhere near the cap. LTIR is only used if you need to exceed the cap to replace a player's salary. The Sabres need his salary to get above the floor.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2021, 01:18 PM   #3998
Saqe
#1 Goaltender
 
Saqe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
You look no further than the Duchene blockbuster for the Avs. Colorado had no need for Turris but they were able to get Turris to commit to an extension with a win now team in Nashville and then get Girard and a 2nd routed to the Avs.

Buffalo would be in a spot where they could retain on Monahan and find a home for him at $3.2M somewhere like Vegas, Boston, Chicago, Seattle Islanders, Ottawa (wouldn’t even need retention)

Good point. Still you have to expect Monahan having a lot of control where to go. Maybe Vegas? I guess they need centers.
Saqe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2021, 01:34 PM   #3999
Scroopy Noopers
Pent-up
 
Scroopy Noopers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Plutanamo Bay.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
Treliving’s biggest moves were acquiring high profile RFA’s. Hamilton,
Lindholm and Hanifin. Kessel to the Leafs is another famous example
I mean… from a Hurricanes perspective I hate it .

Same with the Bruins. You think those were good returns?
Scroopy Noopers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2021, 01:39 PM   #4000
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scroopy Noopers View Post
I mean… from a Hurricanes perspective I hate it .

Same with the Bruins. You think those were good returns?
I’d like it more for the Bruins if they’d taken Barzal/Chabot/Connor instead of whichever nobody they took at 15.

Trading Lindholm and Hanifin for 184 games of Dougie, 71 games of Ferland and a 2nd and 3rd from the Rangers for Fox is horrific.
__________________
”All you have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to you.”

Rowan Roy W-M - February 15, 2024
GreenLantern2814 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GreenLantern2814 For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:39 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy