Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-18-2024, 08:47 AM   #381
stemit14
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

I think the “big return” for Markstrom would come in the form of draft picks and prospects… not young roster players. I agree that the offer needs to be more than what we have typically seen for goalies in recent years. To me, that’s something like a 1st round pick + 2nd round pick + 3rd round pick… that’s a huge return for a goalie these days.
stemit14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2024, 08:50 AM   #382
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

IMO they aren't saying it would take an offer that would blow the doors off only for it to be picks and prospects. I believe the rumor that Mercer or Nemec would come up in NJD as part of it.
Toonage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2024, 10:05 AM   #383
CalgaryFan1988
Franchise Player
 
CalgaryFan1988's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toonage View Post
IMO they aren't saying it would take an offer that would blow the doors off only for it to be picks and prospects. I believe the rumor that Mercer or Nemec would come up in NJD as part of it.
These rumours were for Hanifin.
CalgaryFan1988 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2024, 10:07 AM   #384
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Thought I read yesterday that it was rumored NJD asked about Markstrom and Conroy brought up Mercer/Nemec and the Devils said that was too much. My mistake if that wasn't the case.
Toonage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2024, 10:12 AM   #385
CalgaryFan1988
Franchise Player
 
CalgaryFan1988's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toonage View Post
Thought I read yesterday that it was rumored NJD asked about Markstrom and Conroy brought up Mercer/Nemec and the Devils said that was too much. My mistake if that wasn't the case.
Possible someone that wrote it confused the two. Prior to the Markstrom rumor, Hanifin was rumored to NJ for a 1st and Mercer (with Conroy asking for Mercer). It was an assumption that this would have been for a signed Hanifin.

NJ does need a goalie though too.
CalgaryFan1988 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CalgaryFan1988 For This Useful Post:
Old 01-18-2024, 10:22 AM   #386
topfiverecords
Franchise Player
 
topfiverecords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Park Hyatt Tokyo
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CalgaryFan1988 View Post
Possible someone that wrote it confused the two. Prior to the Markstrom rumor, Hanifin was rumored to NJ for a 1st and Mercer (with Conroy asking for Mercer). It was an assumption that this would have been for a signed Hanifin.

NJ does need a goalie though too.
From yesterday

Quote:
Originally Posted by Harry Lime View Post
Quote:
James Nichols of New Jersey Hockey Now believes that the Devils have shown interest in Markstrom, but the asking price has been significant, as it should be. The Flames are believed to have asked for Simon Nemec or Dawson Mercer in return, both of whom the Devils do not want to part with yet.
That is a crazy ask. It does increase the likelihood that if one of the other UFAs are added to a deal, something really good could come out of Jersey.
topfiverecords is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to topfiverecords For This Useful Post:
Old 01-18-2024, 10:48 AM   #387
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

I'm not crazy! At least in this respect!
Toonage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2024, 11:40 AM   #388
Lanny_McDonald
Franchise Player
 
Lanny_McDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Which is why New Jersey is sniffing around Minnesota and Fleury. Not going to cost Nemec or Mercer or anywhere close to that.
Lanny_McDonald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2024, 11:40 AM   #389
CalgaryFan1988
Franchise Player
 
CalgaryFan1988's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Exp:
Default

Thanks, but I would have to say that maybe James Nichols confused the two rumors. There is no way that is the asking price for Markstrom straight across.
CalgaryFan1988 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2024, 11:45 AM   #390
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lanny_McDonald View Post
Which is why New Jersey is sniffing around Minnesota and Fleury. Not going to cost Nemec or Mercer or anywhere close to that.
39 year old with .800s goaltending and 8 wins in 22 games

Sniff away
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dino7c For This Useful Post:
Old 01-18-2024, 11:47 AM   #391
Badgers Nose
Franchise Player
 
Badgers Nose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Exp:
Default

Definitely something smelly
Badgers Nose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2024, 01:39 PM   #392
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Just got to tip the hat to Lanny in the past few weeks.

Doing God's work making sure no one gets too excited or has any fun with pending UFAs and their returns.

The last thing we want around here is hope and excitement!
Bingo is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
Old 01-18-2024, 01:58 PM   #393
Monahammer
Franchise Player
 
Monahammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
Just got to tip the hat to Lanny in the past few weeks.

Doing God's work making sure no one gets too excited or has any fun with pending UFAs and their returns.

The last thing we want around here is hope and excitement!
Can we likewise give some stick taps to Dino for making us all much stupider over the same period?
Monahammer is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Monahammer For This Useful Post:
Old 01-18-2024, 02:11 PM   #394
bdubbs
Powerplay Quarterback
 
bdubbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
Just got to tip the hat to Lanny in the past few weeks.

Doing God's work making sure no one gets too excited or has any fun with pending UFAs and their returns.

The last thing we want around here is hope and excitement!
Someone has to take the reins after we got rid of Spurs...
bdubbs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2024, 03:26 PM   #395
Lanny_McDonald
Franchise Player
 
Lanny_McDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
Just got to tip the hat to Lanny in the past few weeks.

Doing God's work making sure no one gets too excited or has any fun with pending UFAs and their returns.

The last thing we want around here is hope and excitement!
Yes, because trying to keep things real and in line with historical precedence is killing hope and excitement around here. Good to know.
Lanny_McDonald is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Lanny_McDonald For This Useful Post:
Old 01-18-2024, 03:31 PM   #396
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CalgaryFan1988 View Post
Thanks, but I would have to say that maybe James Nichols confused the two rumors. There is no way that is the asking price for Markstrom straight across.
You're right, the Devils would probably have to add their 1st as well. I was not kidding in the least when I said massive overpay.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2024, 04:20 PM   #397
bluejays
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Exp:
Default

I’m with Lanny a bit on this one. Some of the offers on Markstrom proposed on here are through the roof. It’s fun to talk about but who pays the equivalent of two first rounders for a goalie who may or may not have rebounded? It’s funny but from Conroy saying he won’t trade him unless he gets an offer that blows off his socks, would probably be two first rounders from his point of view. Well, what GM would do that with his recent history? And if teams currently are calling up offering a first plus a bit is that not a good if not great offer? And why do we have to keep him? For what future if this a rebuilding team? I just find the whole thing odd. Don’t get me wrong, Conroy should shoot for the moon but IMO if you can get a first for someone with uncertainty, isn’t part of the long term when you’re ready to compete, and probably won’t have a higher value than now, you take it.
bluejays is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2024, 04:28 PM   #398
topfiverecords
Franchise Player
 
topfiverecords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Park Hyatt Tokyo
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
Just got to tip the hat to Lanny in the past few weeks.

Doing God's work making sure no one gets too excited or has any fun with pending UFAs and their returns.

The last thing we want around here is hope and excitement!
topfiverecords is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to topfiverecords For This Useful Post:
Old 01-18-2024, 04:30 PM   #399
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lanny_McDonald View Post
Yes, because trying to keep things real and in line with historical precedence is killing hope and excitement around here. Good to know.
Well for Tofolli we got a younger, cheaper player with more points and a draft pick

Dare to dream
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2024, 04:32 PM   #400
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bluejays View Post
I’m with Lanny a bit on this one. Some of the offers on Markstrom proposed on here are through the roof. It’s fun to talk about but who pays the equivalent of two first rounders for a goalie who may or may not have rebounded? It’s funny but from Conroy saying he won’t trade him unless he gets an offer that blows off his socks, would probably be two first rounders from his point of view. Well, what GM would do that with his recent history? And if teams currently are calling up offering a first plus a bit is that not a good if not great offer? And why do we have to keep him? For what future if this a rebuilding team? I just find the whole thing odd. Don’t get me wrong, Conroy should shoot for the moon but IMO if you can get a first for someone with uncertainty, isn’t part of the long term when you’re ready to compete, and probably won’t have a higher value than now, you take it.
Depends on the team's thinking for next season.
Do they want to compete? Probably.
Do they trust Wolf to be the #1? Not yet.

So trading Markstrom means largely giving up this season and less chance of competing next season. So the price has to be worth it for that. And it probably isn't.

I realize that is counter to the desire for a full re-build, but we have no indication of the club doing that. So giving up their established #1 isn't easy. I suspect that the gap between the price they would need and what they can get is big. And won't be bridged.
Jiri Hrdina is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:42 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy