Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-16-2021, 08:07 AM   #381
Flamesfan05
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
Exp:
Default

If Treliving pays a 1st+ for Gio, a year from now we’ll have no Gio, no Cup and no good prospects.

Sound like a Treliving way
Flamesfan05 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Flamesfan05 For This Useful Post:
Old 07-16-2021, 08:09 AM   #382
CalgaryFan1988
Franchise Player
 
CalgaryFan1988's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Exp:
Default

I'm sure Treliving has looked at various options, but you would think there would be one team (who isn't deep up front) could acquire Giordano and then protect 4 - 4 instead.

Last edited by CalgaryFan1988; 07-16-2021 at 08:33 AM.
CalgaryFan1988 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2021, 08:09 AM   #383
devo22
Franchise Player
 
devo22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austria, NOT Australia
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
Friedman on 960 saying speculation is that Seattle is asking for a 1st and a 3rd to not pick a player.
I guess we'll see more deals like the Graves trade then.
devo22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2021, 08:35 AM   #384
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

I would love to see Seattle overplay their hand here and see more teams make moves so they can't be held over a barrel.
Jiri Hrdina is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
Old 07-16-2021, 08:39 AM   #385
TOfan
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamesfan05 View Post
If Treliving pays a 1st+ for Gio, a year from now we’ll have no Gio, no Cup and no good prospects.

Sound like a Treliving way
Treliving should be fired immediately!!!!

If Gio is a Flame past next Wednesday, what are the chances of him playing somewhere else in 20022/23? I would put it somewhere between slim and none. I'll go out on a limb and say if he's here come August, he will be a life time Flame and probably sign one year deals until he hangs them up for one reason or another.

No need for the melodrama.

Personally, I hope they expose him and let the chips fall where they may. $6.75 of gained cap space is an asset. As good as Gio has been, this team needs to pivot.

Last edited by TOfan; 07-16-2021 at 09:04 AM.
TOfan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to TOfan For This Useful Post:
Old 07-16-2021, 08:49 AM   #386
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Random View Post
None of those teams are contenders this coming year, so why would they want to give up any assets for a 38-year-old defenceman who is UFA at the end of the season?

Further questions:

If you ran the Canucks, which one of Tyler Myers, Nate Schmidt, and Olli Juolevi would you expose so you could protect Giordano?

If you ran the Kings, which one of Drew Doughty (who has an NMC in any case), Olli Määttä, and (let's say) take your pick of Matt Roy and Sean Walker?

If you ran the Coyotes, most of whose NHL defencemen are headed to UFA at present, you wouldn't have a problem finding a protection slot. But where would you propose to find an extra $6,750,000 to pay Giordano with?

I don't see any of these teams as plausible destinations.
Vancouver could easily protect Gio... BUT they have 15M in cap space to sign Hughes and Petterson ... They would trade some limited asset for Gio but would want the Flames to retain a lot of salary.
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2021, 08:53 AM   #387
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Random View Post
You're blaming the best players, rather than actually trying to get them the help they need. The problem with the Calgary Flames is not that their best players aren't any good. The problem with the Calgary Flames is that they haven't got enough good players. Get rid of Monahan, Gaudreau, and Giordano and bring in Eichel, and you get a team with two more sub-replacement-level randos. This is exactly the wrong direction to go.
Did you actually watch the last two playoff series the Flames played in? Can you honestly say they lost those series because the Avs and Stars bottom six forwards and bottom defence pairings were better than the Flames?

Flames vs Avs

Monahan 2 pts
Lindholm 2
Giordano 2
Gaudreau 1

Rantanen 9
McKinnon 8
Barrie 5
Landeskog 4

https://www.hockey-reference.com/pla...rst-round.html

Flames vs Stars

Gaudreau 4
Lindholm 3
Monahan 2
Giordano 2

Heiskanen 8
Pavelski 6
Klingberg 6
Benn 4

https://www.hockey-reference.com/pla...rst-round.html

This core has been ####ting the bed for over two years now.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to CliffFletcher For This Useful Post:
Old 07-16-2021, 08:53 AM   #388
Mattman
First Line Centre
 
Mattman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: YYC
Exp:
Default

The Flames would be the team to trade assets to keep an aging 2nd pair defenseman while the team has done nothing notable in the last 15 years.

Cool.
__________________
Mattman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2021, 08:54 AM   #389
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina View Post
I would love to see Seattle overplay their hand here and see more teams make moves so they can't be held over a barrel.
The Kraken are doing the right thing IMO as they have all the leverage. Maybe Treliving didn't expect the Kraken's demands to be so high but he should have known that Gio would have been a very attractive option for a variety of reasons. Seems like Treliving is backed into a corner here.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2021, 08:56 AM   #390
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
The Kraken are doing the right thing IMO as they have all the leverage. Maybe Treliving didn't expect the Kraken's demands to be so high but he should have known that Gio would have been a very attractive option for a variety of reasons. Seems like Treliving is backed into a corner here.
I don't see it that way. This is the reality of expansion drafts. Last time the Flames escaped because they didn't have enough good players.
A lot of teams will lose a good player they don't want to. The Flames are no different.
What may have changed is they could have thought, when signing Tanev, that they would expose him. Which is why the lack of a NMC was notable at the time. But his play vastly exceeded expectations while Gio had a declining year (better second half). So now the situation has changed.

BT of course should explore scenarios to keep him. But I don't see how he backed himself into a corner. It's just the reality of the expansion draft.
Jiri Hrdina is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
Old 07-16-2021, 08:57 AM   #391
bubbsy
Franchise Player
 
bubbsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Exp:
Default

I really was hoping Giordano got traded to a legit contender for his last year under this contract. It really his the best option for all parties at this point.
bubbsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2021, 08:58 AM   #392
VladtheImpaler
Franchise Player
 
VladtheImpaler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Just thinking about this. If you take into account that, for good or ill, the Flames are in "win now " mode with Sutter, and you look at performance and contracts... I am exposing Rasmus. I think, with his skills, speed and offense in particular, he is a #4, and I don't like that contract much for a #4 d-man. Leave him exposed - I think he is much easier to replace for that price than Giordano is for his price. I don't mind being free of that contract, given what I have seen in terms of production/performance. This is strictly from the perspective of short-term success. Otherwise, I just let Giordano go and not worry about it.
__________________
Cordially as always,
Vlad the Impaler

Please check out http://forum.calgarypuck.com/showthr...94#post3726494

VladtheImpaler is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to VladtheImpaler For This Useful Post:
Old 07-16-2021, 08:58 AM   #393
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Suspect he will - at the deadline.
Jiri Hrdina is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2021, 08:58 AM   #394
flambers
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by devo22 View Post
I guess we'll see more deals like the Graves trade then.
Its a game of chess, I would think Seattle will make some trades

Teams will hold out as long as they can

Should be interesting....
flambers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2021, 08:59 AM   #395
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina View Post
I don't see it that way. This is the reality of expansion drafts. Last time the Flames escaped because they didn't have enough good players.
A lot of teams will lose a good player they don't want to. The Flames are no different.
What may have changed is they could have thought, when signing Tanev, that they would expose him. Which is why the lack of a NMC was notable at the time. But his play vastly exceeded expectations while Gio had a declining year (better second half). So now the situation has changed.

BT of course should explore scenarios to keep him. But I don't see how he backed himself into a corner. It's just the reality of the expansion draft.
He's backed into a corner because he really wants to keep Gio and the price to keep him is extremely prohibitive. He loses no matter the outcome.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2021, 08:59 AM   #396
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Its really too bad Gio wasn't moved at the last deadline.
Toonage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2021, 09:00 AM   #397
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Again that's the reality of the expansion draft.
The Canes really want to keep Jake Bean.
They won't be able to.
There is no way for current teams NOT to lose. It's set up that way.
Jiri Hrdina is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2021, 09:01 AM   #398
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina View Post
Again that's the reality of the expansion draft.
The Canes really want to keep Jake Bean.
They won't be able to.
There is no way for current teams NOT to lose. It's set up that way.
I don't think Jake Bean means as much to the Canes as Gio to the Flames. I get what you are saying but it's a little apples to oranges.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2021, 09:02 AM   #399
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

It is apples and oranges, but the Canes used a top 15 pick on Bean. Sucks to lose that for nothing particularly when the guy probably is going to be a solid young NHLer who has been blocked by their D depth. The Flames scenario would be Valimaki not getting injured and being exposed in this draft. Somewhat lucky that's not happening. Would fans be more upset to lose Gio or Valimaki?
(surprised they haven't flipped him yet to recoup something, even a 2nd round pick)
Jiri Hrdina is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2021, 09:03 AM   #400
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toonage View Post
Its really too bad Gio wasn't moved at the last deadline.
This is the problem with teams that keep trying to win even when the walls around them are burning down. Yes they should have traded Gio at the deadline but we all know that was never an option the GM was considering. This team has never been able to make the difficult decisions when it comes to asset management.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Erick Estrada For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:44 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy