10-19-2010, 09:12 AM
|
#21
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
|
N^2 gets 1 shot to prove to me he isnt some Suzuki Foundation lapdog and that he can resist the burb-builder influence that has infected city hall.
__________________
MYK - Supports Arizona to democtratically pass laws for the state of Arizona
Rudy was the only hope in 08
2011 Election: Cons 40% - Nanos 38% Ekos 34%
|
|
|
10-19-2010, 09:13 AM
|
#22
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Memento Mori
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 4X4
I missed whatever happened here... Please elaborate.
|
Just the number of key votes he keeps missing.
__________________
If you don't pass this sig to ten of your friends, you will become an Oilers fan.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Shazam For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-19-2010, 09:14 AM
|
#23
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Memento Mori
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mykalberta
N^2 gets 1 shot to prove to me he isnt some Suzuki Foundation lapdog and that he can resist the burb-builder influence that has infected city hall.
|
Did you read his column in the Herald? Should give you a pretty good idea of what he about (hint: he more's left than NASCAR).
__________________
If you don't pass this sig to ten of your friends, you will become an Oilers fan.
|
|
|
10-19-2010, 09:23 AM
|
#24
|
something else haha
|
Can't believe Hodges won again. I gave way too much credit to my ward for realizing that this guy is a complete waste of space.
|
|
|
10-19-2010, 09:24 AM
|
#25
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shazam
Did you read his column in the Herald? Should give you a pretty good idea of what he about (hint: he more's left than NASCAR).
|
Yes I did read his columns, which is why I donated to his campaign before he announced and why I voted for him.
The things I care about Left vs Right in Provincial and Federal politics dont really apply on the municipal level which is why I am giving him 1 chance.
He might be suzuki foundation left but he is limited in what he can do at city hall. Since I am one of the people who own a condo which happens to share the same piece of city real estate as 5 other units and yet I am taxed the same as if i had some small house or townhouse with a backyard is something I hope he will try to level the playing field.
While I am against spending 25m on a footbridge because some people want to be more cosmopolitan with some euro trash designer, I am also against spending that 25m instead on some overpass in Sundance.
__________________
MYK - Supports Arizona to democtratically pass laws for the state of Arizona
Rudy was the only hope in 08
2011 Election: Cons 40% - Nanos 38% Ekos 34%
|
|
|
10-19-2010, 09:25 AM
|
#26
|
Crash and Bang Winger
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shazam
Did you read his column in the Herald? Should give you a pretty good idea of what he about (hint: he more's left than NASCAR).
|
You always believe what people tell you? Mciver was the Heralds choice because their biggest source of revenue is the developers that advertise with them, who also happen to be Mciver's biggest supporters.
In true fiscal conservatism, the business should pay the true cost and factor it into price. What's been happening is that houses built on the outskirts are getting their water/sewer etc paid by the city, that's my taxes, your taxes, and business taxes going to what should essentially be paid by the people buying the new homes. That's not capitalism, that's crony capitalism and It has to stop. If I buy a big house in the suburbs, I should pay the $10K for the water/sewer. Why should Calgary taxpayers pay for it? What if the developer paid for water/sewer but the city paid for granite counters or hardwood floors on the outskirts? It would be the same thing, but THAT would be an outrage? It's BS!
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Zee For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-19-2010, 09:27 AM
|
#27
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary
|
Very happy that Fox-Mellaway was defeated, would have liked to have seen The Butcher get the position.
|
|
|
10-19-2010, 09:30 AM
|
#28
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Underground
|
Congrats to Gian Carlo!
Went to high school with him. A real articulate guy. Hope he works out for Ward 9.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Flames Fan, Ph.D. For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-19-2010, 09:33 AM
|
#29
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: On my metal monster.
|
Can't blame my Ward, our Alderman got smoked in the mayoral race (Hawkesworth).
|
|
|
10-19-2010, 09:38 AM
|
#30
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Memento Mori
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zee
You always believe what people tell you? Mciver was the Heralds choice because their biggest source of revenue is the developers that advertise with them, who also happen to be Mciver's biggest supporters.
|
You're quite strange with the conspiracy theories.
Can we then say Nenshi was funded by those same developers, who gave the Herald money via advertisements that paid for the Herald's columnists?
Quote:
In true fiscal conservatism, the business should pay the true cost and factor it into price. What's been happening is that houses built on the outskirts are getting their water/sewer etc paid by the city, that's my taxes, your taxes, and business taxes going to what should essentially be paid by the people buying the new homes. That's not capitalism, that's crony capitalism and It has to stop. If I buy a big house in the suburbs, I should pay the $10K for the water/sewer. Why should Calgary taxpayers pay for it? What if the developer paid for water/sewer but the city paid for granite counters or hardwood floors on the outskirts? It would be the same thing, but THAT would be an outrage? It's BS!
|
Who's paying for the airport tunnel then?
Also, I don't really care for your tone. It's that divisive tone that you Nenshi supporters claim broke council, yet here you are, criticizing.
I suppose you wouldn't be talking to me in a condescending tone if I lived downtown, right? (Or, maybe I do, and I just want to hear how people react to opposing view  )
__________________
If you don't pass this sig to ten of your friends, you will become an Oilers fan.
Last edited by Shazam; 10-19-2010 at 09:48 AM.
|
|
|
10-19-2010, 09:40 AM
|
#31
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Memento Mori
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mykalberta
Yes I did read his columns, which is why I donated to his campaign before he announced and why I voted for him.
The things I care about Left vs Right in Provincial and Federal politics dont really apply on the municipal level which is why I am giving him 1 chance.
He might be suzuki foundation left but he is limited in what he can do at city hall. Since I am one of the people who own a condo which happens to share the same piece of city real estate as 5 other units and yet I am taxed the same as if i had some small house or townhouse with a backyard is something I hope he will try to level the playing field.
While I am against spending 25m on a footbridge because some people want to be more cosmopolitan with some euro trash designer, I am also against spending that 25m instead on some overpass in Sundance.
|
What's your tax assessment? Let's compare against mine, please, before you start to complain about who pays more.
__________________
If you don't pass this sig to ten of your friends, you will become an Oilers fan.
|
|
|
10-19-2010, 09:47 AM
|
#32
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Memento Mori
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mykalberta
Yes I did read his columns, which is why I donated to his campaign before he announced and why I voted for him.
The things I care about Left vs Right in Provincial and Federal politics dont really apply on the municipal level which is why I am giving him 1 chance.
|
Hell, I'll give him three chances.
City policies actually impact people the most. That's typically why mayors are very left-leaning - they're okay with spending that directly impacts citizens.
Not sure why you didn't understand his stance on issues if you claim you read his column.
__________________
If you don't pass this sig to ten of your friends, you will become an Oilers fan.
|
|
|
10-19-2010, 09:47 AM
|
#33
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zee
In true fiscal conservatism, the business should pay the true cost and factor it into price. What's been happening is that houses built on the outskirts are getting their water/sewer etc paid by the city, that's my taxes, your taxes, and business taxes going to what should essentially be paid by the people buying the new homes. That's not capitalism, that's crony capitalism and It has to stop. If I buy a big house in the suburbs, I should pay the $10K for the water/sewer. Why should Calgary taxpayers pay for it? What if the developer paid for water/sewer but the city paid for granite counters or hardwood floors on the outskirts? It would be the same thing, but THAT would be an outrage? It's BS!
|
Ok, but then because I live in the burbs, I don't feel I should be paying for LRT expansion or any improvements to bike paths and foot bridges downtown since I don't use any of these services. Why should my tax dollars go to something I don't use?
|
|
|
10-19-2010, 09:49 AM
|
#34
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Memento Mori
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Yen Man
Ok, but then because I live in the burbs, I don't feel I should be paying for LRT expansion or any improvements to bike paths and foot bridges downtown since I don't use any of these services. Why should my tax dollars go to something I don't use?
|
Because, there's people that still believe a house in the suburbs costs $150K.
__________________
If you don't pass this sig to ten of your friends, you will become an Oilers fan.
|
|
|
10-19-2010, 09:49 AM
|
#35
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: DeWinton, AB
|
Druh won by 24 votes.... 24!!@!@! That is redic in an election...
I wish 25 people would have changed their vote...
|
|
|
10-19-2010, 09:55 AM
|
#36
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
The results look good regarding the mayoral race. I just hope all the promises of change are followed through.
One thing I'm not too happy about are the comments that political Jay Feaster had on Global's coverage last night. He said a lot of things that weren't right or just sounded stupid (i.e. "he's a visible minority but articulate" and "his family was deported from Africa."). I don't know when last night it changed from "Great job Calgary for voting on change" to "Great job Calgary for voting a brown guy as the mayor".
|
|
|
10-19-2010, 09:55 AM
|
#37
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TylerSVT
Druh won by 24 votes.... 24!!@!@! That is redic in an election...
I wish 25 people would have changed their vote...
|
That's pretty close. Will they be doing a re-count?
|
|
|
10-19-2010, 09:57 AM
|
#38
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
|
For the record, I was just stating that for argument's sake. I actually agree tax dollars should go towards LRT expansion and downtown improvements. In fact, I actually support the money used to build the Peace Bridge (I disagreed with the process to secure the funding, but I support the project itself).
I'm just tired of all these downtown elitists who think they're better than us suburbians. Not everyone wants to live downtown or near downtown. Heck, I don't even work downtown, so why would I want to constantly deal with all the traffic in the core?
|
|
|
10-19-2010, 09:58 AM
|
#39
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bizaro86
That's pretty close. Will they be doing a re-count?
|
I heard them say last night that it needed to be within 500 for the mayoral vote to have a recount. I presume the aldermanic would be alot less since there's alot less votes per race.... not sure if there's a set # or if its an appeal process.
|
|
|
10-19-2010, 10:01 AM
|
#40
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: not lurking
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TylerSVT
Druh won by 24 votes.... 24!!@!@! That is redic in an election...
I wish 25 people would have changed their vote...
|
City of Calgary page shows she won by over 1200.
http://www.gov.calgary.ab.ca/election/
In my neighbourhood, there were a lot of people who liked Druh's politics, but hated her lack of professionalism at times, while Taylor acted far more professional, but had a political stance that was just too right-wing. I think if someone a little more lefty than Taylor had mounted a good campaign, he would have won easily. Anyway, hopefully this result is close enough that it makes Druh realize that she needs to change her style or she will get punted next time.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to octothorp For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:47 PM.
|
|