Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-03-2009, 11:27 AM   #21
TRIX
Scoring Winger
 
TRIX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Antithesis View Post
...the new Fusions are really nice as well.


if you really think that you havn't driven a good car...I would take a mid 80's Volvo over a Fusion any day...had one for a rental...wow, such a POS

Quote:
Originally Posted by burn_this_city View Post
I almost bought an F250 in '07 when I bought my GMC 2500. I just heard a lot of bad things about the 6.0 Liter diesel engine they were selling at the time. Ford engines are typically bullet proof but the diesels are built by international and they were having too many problems with injectors ect.
good thing you didn't buy the Ford, that 6.0L had the worst headgasket problems after 150k...not to mention that new mess of a motor, the 6.4L, wow, great idea that was!

looking forward to seeing the new 6.7L Ford built engine, however, will it stray me from my duramax....hell no

Ford has lost a lot of buisness in the "work truck" market, which has been picked up by GM, we'll see if they get it back
__________________
GO FLAMES GO!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by flip View Post
It is official, I'm an idiot.

Last edited by TRIX; 11-03-2009 at 11:29 AM.
TRIX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 12:00 PM   #22
Red_Baron
First Line Centre
 
Red_Baron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Kelowna, B.C.
Exp:
Default

I did my part by buying an 09 mustang GT.
The only reason GM may have possibly picked up any ground (I'd like to see numbers to back this up as very few mining companies use GM trucks) in the work truck market is because they were practically giving the trucks away.
Red_Baron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 12:08 PM   #23
Dion
Not a casual user
 
Dion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: A simple man leading a complicated life....
Exp:
Default

I own a 2005 Escape. Best vehicle i've ever owned. Will buy another one when it's time to trade this one in.
__________________
Dion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 12:55 PM   #24
redforever
Franchise Player
 
redforever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Exp:
Default

I owned 2 Ford Explorers, 1991 and 1994 models, excellent vehicles, kept each almost 10 years and had no work done to them except standard maintenance like oil changes, a new set of tires and I think maybe brakes. Never even had to change the battery on either one.

We are on our second Ford truck, both diesels. First was a 1984 F250 series, we kept it for 11 years, the person who bought it is still using it. It did have some minor problem with the glow plugs, but Ford had some kind of recall and replaced them.

We now have a 1995 F250 diesel, the 7.2 power (super?) stroke or whatever it is called. Another excellent vehicle, pulls 4 horses in a trailer in the mountains, no problem whatsoever. It has manual hubs as did the the 1984 truck. The 1995 model has different glow plugs than the 1984 model and they have never been a problem.

With both trucks, just the normal oil changes and maintenance have been required.

People always approach us wanting to buy the 1995 model. It gets excellent mileage compared to the new trucks and the engine in it is great. No way will we sell, it only has 75000 km on it.

Last edited by redforever; 11-03-2009 at 12:57 PM.
redforever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 12:59 PM   #25
Winsor_Pilates
Franchise Player
 
Winsor_Pilates's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Van City - Main St.
Exp:
Default

Winsor_Pilates is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Winsor_Pilates For This Useful Post:
Old 11-03-2009, 01:11 PM   #26
Berger_4_
First Line Centre
 
Berger_4_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Wherever the cooler is.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by burn_this_city View Post
I almost bought an F250 in '07 when I bought my GMC 2500. I just heard a lot of bad things about the 6.0 Liter diesel engine they were selling at the time. Ford engines are typically bullet proof but the diesels are built by international and they were having too many problems with injectors ect.
Plus they're bloody loud. Not as bad as the old Dodge Cummins but holy smokes do they howl when you're heading down the highway.

I think it's pretty hit and miss in regards to how finicky the injectors in those International's are. Our newer (2003 I think) semi had a couple injectors go on it after we bought it, but the late 90's one we've got hasn't had anything like that happen to it.
__________________
Let's get drunk and do philosophy.

If you took a burger off the grill and slapped it on your face, I'm pretty sure it would burn you. - kermitology
Berger_4_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 01:12 PM   #27
Phanuthier
Franchise Player
 
Phanuthier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Silicon Valley
Exp:
Default

What is it about Ford that kept their heads above water versus GM and Chrystler? Its not like GM and Chrystler were having trouble selling cars. It has to be in the operations costs, Ford was doing something different than the other 2 counterparts that failed. I thought I had read somewhere Ford had shifted major/pricey operations overseas a while ago, but I'm not sure if it was exactly that.
__________________
"With a coach and a player, sometimes there's just so much respect there that it's boils over"
-Taylor Hall
Phanuthier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 01:53 PM   #28
HOOT
Franchise Player
 
HOOT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: @HOOT250
Exp:
Default

I will never buy American for the rest of my life.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by henriksedin33 View Post
Not at all, as I've said, I would rather start with LA over any of the other WC playoff teams. Bunch of underachievers who look good on paper but don't even deserve to be in the playoffs.
HOOT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 02:00 PM   #29
Cliche
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Cliche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Wherever you go there you are.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phanuthier View Post
What is it about Ford that kept their heads above water versus GM and Chrystler? Its not like GM and Chrystler were having trouble selling cars. It has to be in the operations costs, Ford was doing something different than the other 2 counterparts that failed. I thought I had read somewhere Ford had shifted major/pricey operations overseas a while ago, but I'm not sure if it was exactly that.
http://jalopnik.com/5395082/ford-pos...-year/gallery/

just to throw water on good news.

Also judging from the comments, UAW is going to be bending them over during negotiations.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Way_Forward
__________________
Tacitus: Rara temporum felicitate, ubi sentire quae velis, et quae sentias dicere licet.
Cliche is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 02:04 PM   #30
Phanuthier
Franchise Player
 
Phanuthier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Silicon Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cliche View Post
Thats kind of funny. I guess its just a PR stimulus to try and keep things positive.

If Ford wants to competitive and enter this new market, they arn't going to be able to dodge these sort of things on future financial statements and quarterly reports.
__________________
"With a coach and a player, sometimes there's just so much respect there that it's boils over"
-Taylor Hall
Phanuthier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 02:04 PM   #31
TRIX
Scoring Winger
 
TRIX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Red_Baron View Post
...I'd like to see numbers to back this up as very few mining companies use GM trucks) in the work truck market...
don't know about mining and do not know exact numbers, just looking at trends in the patch, most guys who run their own trucks have switched to GM and most service companies which provide company vehicles 1 ton and 3/4 ton have as well

Quote:
Originally Posted by redforever View Post
We now have a 1995 F250 diesel, the 7.3 power (super?) stroke or whatever it is called...People always approach us wanting to buy the 1995 model. It gets excellent mileage compared to the new trucks and the engine in it is great. No way will we sell, it only has 75000 km on it.
fixed...and that 7.3L is a monster, very well built IMO...very shocking to hear of a '95 diesel with 75k clicks on it, I think I put 80k plus in one year on my truck, both personal and work...crazy! hold onto to that gem!

it's nice to hear of the old trucks still kickin it, without all the emissions BS they have now

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phanuthier View Post
What is it about Ford that kept their heads above water versus GM and Chrystler?
I think it has to do with commercial contracts, I could be out to lunch but I think it does contribute quite a bit to the overall profit margin...

- law enforcement services
- EMS/Fire services
- oilfield
- city vehicles

just an assumption from what I have noticed over the years
__________________
GO FLAMES GO!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by flip View Post
It is official, I'm an idiot.
TRIX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 02:55 PM   #32
Bring_Back_Shantz
Franchise Player
 
Bring_Back_Shantz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: In my office, at the Ministry of Awesome!
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cliche View Post
http://jalopnik.com/5395082/ford-pos...-year/gallery/

just to throw water on good news.

Also judging from the comments, UAW is going to be bending them over during negotiations.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Way_Forward
Damnit, this is exactly why I hate unions, and ESPECIALLY the UAW.
Seriously, Ford is the one American Car company who has managed to move towards profitability without a bailout, and the UAW thinks it's in their best interest to try to rake them over the coals?
Man they must have short memories, and incredibly bad vision.
__________________
THE SHANTZ WILL RISE AGAIN.
<-----Check the Badge bitches. You want some Awesome, you come to me!
Bring_Back_Shantz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 03:59 PM   #33
mykalberta
Franchise Player
 
mykalberta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phanuthier View Post
What is it about Ford that kept their heads above water versus GM and Chrystler? Its not like GM and Chrystler were having trouble selling cars. It has to be in the operations costs, Ford was doing something different than the other 2 counterparts that failed. I thought I had read somewhere Ford had shifted major/pricey operations overseas a while ago, but I'm not sure if it was exactly that.
They started reorganization along time ago when they hired away a top Manager at Boeing to be their CEO. They have been been in the rebuild mode for along time compared to GM and Dodge who turned a blind eye to it and are now unfortunately propped up by Jon Q taxpayer.
__________________
MYK - Supports Arizona to democtratically pass laws for the state of Arizona
Rudy was the only hope in 08
2011 Election: Cons 40% - Nanos 38% Ekos 34%
mykalberta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 04:05 PM   #34
QuadCityImages
Scoring Winger
 
QuadCityImages's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Davenport, Iowa
Exp:
Default


I'm totally dreaming of buying this Escape sometime. 2010's start in the $18k range around here, which is almost doable for a poor guy like me.
QuadCityImages is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 05:20 PM   #35
Ice
#1 Goaltender
 
Ice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Southern California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Displaced Flames fan View Post
We have a 2005 Escape and love it. Almost 90K miles on it and the only thing we've had to do is change the brakes, tires and battery. The best vehicle I have ever owned was my '04 F-150. Dreamy.
We have a 2004 Escape that we use as the hockey car. It has 95,000 miles and we've never had a problem. I figure we'll drive it until it dies, which looks like its a long way off. Its the perfect size to be able to haul my kids gear and have enough room for him in the back, but small enough to fit in normal parking spaces and get decent gas mileage.
Ice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 06:35 PM   #36
Jiggy_12
Franchise Player
 
Jiggy_12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

I own a 2008 Edge, love it.
Jiggy_12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 07:08 PM   #37
thesmugger
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Exp:
Default

Still don't like anything in the Ford lineup.. Fugly cars.
thesmugger is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to thesmugger For This Useful Post:
Old 11-03-2009, 07:21 PM   #38
Sliver
evil of fart
 
Sliver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thesmugger View Post
Still don't like anything in the Ford lineup.. Fugly cars.
Fair enough. What kind of cars do you like?
Sliver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 07:34 PM   #39
henriksedin33
Lifetime Suspension
 
henriksedin33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Exp:
Default

its good to see at least one of the big 3 staving off death, but they are still trailing the Japanese and arguably Koreans in quality, IMO. Just seems like they're always 4-5 years behind the curve.
henriksedin33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 07:43 PM   #40
Ford Prefect
Has Towel, Will Travel
 
Ford Prefect's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Exp:
Default

My next car will probably be a Fusion. I haven't owned a Ford for over 20 years, but the Fusion really interests me. I've been driving Chryslers lately, but they have their heads up their whazoos anymore. Time to move on again. I've gone through Ford, GM, Mazda and Chrysler phases. I was going to move on to Toyota or Hyundai next, but Ford has changed my mind.
Ford Prefect is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:33 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy