09-25-2009, 10:05 PM
|
#21
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: not lurking
|
Copeland is un-freakin'-believable this year.
|
|
|
09-25-2009, 10:05 PM
|
#22
|
NOT breaking news
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jammies
Stamps lucky there, Suitor was right by my thinking. Not going to complain here - and another great catch by Copeland!
|
Yeah but might be easier rules in the CFL for a catch. Maybe just need to catch get one foot down and that's enough.
In NFL for example, you have to make the catch and maintain possession after hitting the ground. Like the incomplete pass call in the first Raiders game this year in the endzone.
__________________
Watching the Oilers defend is like watching fire engines frantically rushing to the wrong fire
|
|
|
09-25-2009, 10:05 PM
|
#23
|
Franchise Player
|
great catch by our two Super Slots. Even better TD catch by Copeland. 24-17 Calgary.
|
|
|
09-25-2009, 10:06 PM
|
#24
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Market Mall Food Court
|
Copeland is freaking amazing!
|
|
|
09-25-2009, 10:16 PM
|
#25
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Market Mall Food Court
|
Canuck-lover Suitor needs to shut up about that catch. He has possesion of the ball, his foot touch the ground and the ground made him fumble. It's a catch.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Bertuzzied For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-25-2009, 10:21 PM
|
#26
|
Franchise Player
|
I forgot the rulings on how many times the team are allowed to challenge. BC already lost a challenge on Copeland TD. Now another challenge?
|
|
|
09-25-2009, 10:28 PM
|
#27
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: not lurking
|
I believe you get one free challenge, and then a second challenge, which if you lose, you lose a timeout.
|
|
|
09-25-2009, 10:30 PM
|
#28
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bertuzzied
Canuck-lover Suitor needs to shut up about that catch. He has possesion of the ball, his foot touch the ground and the ground made him fumble. It's a catch.
|
Agreed. Still not sure about the call, but Suitor needs to shut up about it already.
Oh snap, field goal attempt off BOTH BARS. FAIL!!!!!
|
|
|
09-25-2009, 10:32 PM
|
#29
|
Franchise Player
|
Freaking Cuthbert jinxed DeAngelis again. This is the thrid time this season he mentioned about missed field goal. All 3 times DeAngelis missed the field goal.
|
|
|
09-25-2009, 10:34 PM
|
#30
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OzSome
This is the thrid time this season he mentioned about missed field goal. All 3 times DeAngelis missed the field goal.
|
It's true, kinda creepy actually.
Interception Stamps, probably the turning point.
|
|
|
09-25-2009, 10:35 PM
|
#31
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Market Mall Food Court
|
hahaha. If FirstGameMan Webb was in there he would have tipped it to the receiver and BC would have scored a touchdown.
Has anyone had a worse first game than Webb?
|
|
|
09-25-2009, 10:37 PM
|
#32
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
CFL reffing is so strange, that should have been a pass interference call on B.C. Sandro with another attempt..............
Makes it.
|
|
|
09-25-2009, 10:39 PM
|
#33
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by zamler
CFL reffing is so strange, that should have been a pass interference call on B.C. Sandro with another attempt..............
Makes it.
|
Noticed Cuthbert didn't even say anything about missing field goal?
|
|
|
09-25-2009, 10:41 PM
|
#34
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OzSome
Noticed Cuthbert didn't even say anything about missing field goal? 
|
lol I never thought of that.
B.C. is killing themselves with penalties, just wiped out a good return. And again, negates a 1st down on a holding penalty. Bleh they got the 1st down anyway.
|
|
|
09-25-2009, 10:57 PM
|
#35
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Good game by the Stamps, they turned it up when they needed to. Got some help (maybe) from the officials, but good win.
|
|
|
09-25-2009, 11:00 PM
|
#36
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Maple Ridge, BC
|
Brutal call ruined the game......no way was the dude downed by contact when Miles intercepted it.......If the WR doesn't catch the ball, it's ruled incomplete....but Miles intercepts it and he's ruled down by contact.....brutal.....ruined the game.....stamps got away with one there.....but in the end, were clearly the better team and deserved the win.
|
|
|
09-25-2009, 11:05 PM
|
#37
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Market Mall Food Court
|
Suitor is going to be crying all week when the Flames destroy his beloved Canucks tomorrow and on Oct. 1
|
|
|
09-25-2009, 11:08 PM
|
#38
|
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by VANFLAMESFAN
Brutal call ruined the game......no way was the dude downed by contact when Miles intercepted it.......If the WR doesn't catch the ball, it's ruled incomplete....but Miles intercepts it and he's ruled down by contact.....brutal.....ruined the game.....stamps got away with one there.....but in the end, were clearly the better team and deserved the win.
|
I thought it was a bad call, but the explanation makes sense now. Lewis did survive the first contact with the ground (his foot), and his second contact with the ground ended the play.
|
|
|
09-25-2009, 11:09 PM
|
#39
|
Crash and Bang Winger
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by VANFLAMESFAN
Brutal call ruined the game......no way was the dude downed by contact when Miles intercepted it.......If the WR doesn't catch the ball, it's ruled incomplete....but Miles intercepts it and he's ruled down by contact.....brutal.....ruined the game.....stamps got away with one there.....but in the end, were clearly the better team and deserved the win.
|
Yeah, seemed like all the calls went the Stamps way; and that's coming from one who hates the Lions. No complaints, good win still!
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:51 AM.
|
|