07-29-2009, 11:47 AM
|
#21
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Victoria, BC
|
Glen beck tries so hard to stay relevant that it comes off as extremely entertaining. I've never encountered a guy that goes so far out of his way to be noticed. There's no way anyone could ever take him seriously. He's a walking, talking tabloid. In it for the money I guess. Good for him.
|
|
|
07-29-2009, 11:48 AM
|
#22
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure
You're going to see Republican Congress in 1-1/2 years.
|
Sadly, I think that's too optimistic... I think those two morons (Pelosi and Reid) will need to wear on the voters for another 3 years...
|
|
|
07-29-2009, 11:49 AM
|
#23
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Victoria, BC
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Byrns
I didn't see any apology in Obama's message. "I could have calibrated those words differently." Is not "I'm sorry"
|
Is admitting a mistake not a form of an apology?
|
|
|
07-29-2009, 11:51 AM
|
#24
|
Had an idea!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HotHotHeat
Glen beck tries so hard to stay relevant that it comes off as extremely entertaining. I've never encountered a guy that goes so far out of his way to be noticed. There's no way anyone could ever take him seriously. He's a walking, talking tabloid. In it for the money I guess. Good for him.
|
Exactly.
I get a kick out of his over the top stupidity.
|
|
|
07-29-2009, 11:56 AM
|
#25
|
Referee
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Over the hill
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cowboy89
Back in 2001 and 2002 many were saying the same thing about never seeing a Democratic president again. These things are cyclical. What usually happens is that over time a government/party that has been in power too long tends to be the author of their own demise by becoming the very thing they protested against to get into power in the first place. Trust me there will be a day when the dems go too far for the American people and they'll elect enough Republicans.
|
Absolutely true. You may in fact see a Republican wave in the next midterm elections. The Senate is harder for them--the math is just not very appealing--but I would not be shocked to see the Republicans take Congress next election.
That is, unless they really hitch their wagons to this "birther" nonsense. That stuff is poison for them, if they would only realize it. Democrats are licking their chops at the thought of GOP congressional leaders kowtowing to the lunatic fringe of their party over the next 2 years.
|
|
|
07-29-2009, 12:03 PM
|
#26
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: City by the Bay
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure
You're going to see Republican Congress in 1-1/2 years.
|
Yes please. Not that I really believe that a Republican Congress is so much superior to a Dem Congress, but I'm a fan of having Congress and the President checking and balancing each other.
|
|
|
07-29-2009, 12:11 PM
|
#27
|
Referee
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Over the hill
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clever_Iggy
Yes please. Not that I really believe that a Republican Congress is so much superior to a Dem Congress, but I'm a fan of having Congress and the President checking and balancing each other.
|
I agree. However, I do think the GOP needs to pull its head out of its collective ass and start freezing out the lunatic fringe. If they don't become a mainstream party again, they'll be left out in the cold for a while, and I don't really think that's good for anybody.
I'd start by categorically rejecting "birther" types, and making it clear that Sarah Palin will come nowhere near the party in 2012.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Iowa_Flames_Fan For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-29-2009, 12:14 PM
|
#28
|
Norm!
|
I completely agree, right now the fastest path of power for the republicans is to moderate their message.
Right now, I firmly believe that if the U.S. economony continues to falter, and doesn't show major signs of approval that Obama will be the first casualty at the next election.
But it depends on who the Republicans put into play. They need someone thats young and has a good solid grasp on recession based economies.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CaptainCrunch For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-29-2009, 12:17 PM
|
#29
|
Referee
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Over the hill
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch
I completely agree, right now the fastest path of power for the republicans is to moderate their message.
Right now, I firmly believe that if the U.S. economony continues to falter, and doesn't show major signs of approval that Obama will be the first casualty at the next election.
But it depends on who the Republicans put into play. They need someone thats young and has a good solid grasp on recession based economies.
|
Can't argue with that. The economy, for better or worse, is Obama's problem now. Three years is a long time for people to forget their high hopes when he was elected.
On the other hand, if the economy drastically improves over the next 20 months, Obama might be very hard to beat.
The irony is how little control he actually has over either outcome.
|
|
|
07-29-2009, 12:22 PM
|
#30
|
First Line Centre
|
Thank god for the CBC. Most Canadians don't know how good our national news is. If it weren't for Jon Stewart, I would never hear about idiots like Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh or Lou Dobbs and the whole world would be better off.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Cactus Jack For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-29-2009, 12:23 PM
|
#31
|
Franchise Player
|
I agree with Azure, and can't wait for this to turn into Gates thread part two.
__________________
But living an honest life - for that you need the truth. That's the other thing I learned that day, that the truth, however shocking or uncomfortable, leads to liberation and dignity. -Ricky Gervais
|
|
|
07-29-2009, 12:26 PM
|
#32
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: City by the Bay
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iowa_Flames_Fan
I agree. However, I do think the GOP needs to pull its head out of its collective ass and start freezing out the lunatic fringe. If they don't become a mainstream party again, they'll be left out in the cold for a while, and I don't really think that's good for anybody.
I'd start by categorically rejecting "birther" types, and making it clear that Sarah Palin will come nowhere near the party in 2012.
|
Absolutely. If it requires them to be "frozen out" for a term or two, so be it. I'm not a fan of the Dems being able to run roughshod, but I don't want the lunatic fringe to get another gasp of air.
First step is a strong leader to emerge that has the popularity and the vision to cut out the radicals, declare Palin an enemy to the party and transition the Republican Party back to the economic conservative policies that made it so popular (and away from the massive spending (it's true) and moral high ground BS that it takes currently).
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Clever_Iggy For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-29-2009, 12:46 PM
|
#33
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cactus Jack
Thank god for the CBC. Most Canadians don't know how good our national news is. If it weren't for Jon Stewart, I would never hear about idiots like Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh or Lou Dobbs and the whole world would be better off.
|
You mean the unbiased voice of left-of-centre Toronto residents?
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to VladtheImpaler For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-29-2009, 12:51 PM
|
#34
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clever_Iggy
Absolutely. If it requires them to be "frozen out" for a term or two, so be it. I'm not a fan of the Dems being able to run roughshod, but I don't want the lunatic fringe to get another gasp of air.
First step is a strong leader to emerge that has the popularity and the vision to cut out the radicals, declare Palin an enemy to the party and transition the Republican Party back to the economic conservative policies that made it so popular (and away from the massive spending (it's true) and moral high ground BS that it takes currently).
|
The problem for the GOP is the primary math - that is, BOC's and other "morality" issue types tend to make or break any given candidate. McCain was really stupid in that he moved in that direction (by choosing Palin) after securing the nomination, rather than trying to move to the coveted centre.
|
|
|
07-29-2009, 12:54 PM
|
#35
|
First Line Centre
|
I remember coming home from a trip to the US, the news was primarily about updates on the Anna Nicole Smith case with interruptions for the latest on Britney Spears' antics. When I came back home, I remember turning on the TV and watching that National on CBC, among other things, they provided an in depth report on the struggles of farmers in afghanistan. Not once did they mention the mindless pop-culture bull$hiz that is shoved down the gullets of the American public.
Make no mistake, we have it good up here.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to starseed For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-29-2009, 01:03 PM
|
#36
|
Had an idea!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iowa_Flames_Fan
Absolutely true. You may in fact see a Republican wave in the next midterm elections. The Senate is harder for them--the math is just not very appealing--but I would not be shocked to see the Republicans take Congress next election.
That is, unless they really hitch their wagons to this "birther" nonsense. That stuff is poison for them, if they would only realize it. Democrats are licking their chops at the thought of GOP congressional leaders kowtowing to the lunatic fringe of their party over the next 2 years.
|
As stupid as the 'birther' stuff is.....it just shows what American politics are all about.
|
|
|
07-29-2009, 01:05 PM
|
#37
|
Had an idea!
|
Oh, and I don't like what the Republicans present either.....but I just think having them fight over everything is a good thing.
Clinton actually ran a surplus while he was in office. With a Republican Congress.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Azure For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-29-2009, 01:07 PM
|
#38
|
First Line Centre
|
Yep, say what you want about their tactics, the fact is that they work. Cater to the crazies, throw mud everywhere and anywhere and some of it will always stick. It does not matter how utterly stupid or trivial it is, as long as it gets people in a frenzy and to the polling stations.
|
|
|
07-29-2009, 01:09 PM
|
#39
|
Often Thinks About Pickles
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Okotoks
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cactus Jack
Thank god for the CBC.
|
Are you serious? CBC... the last refuge of all Liberals and NDP supporters.
|
|
|
07-29-2009, 01:09 PM
|
#40
|
Had an idea!
|
What I don't get about this whole 'birther' thing.....McCain's people checked it out during the primaries.
If there would have been anything to it, THEY would have surely presented it.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:28 PM.
|
|