Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Other Sports: Football, Baseball, Local Hockey, Etc...
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Should the Jays trade Halladay?
Yes, this year. 51 51.00%
Yes, next year. 11 11.00%
No, not at all. 38 38.00%
Voters: 100. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-08-2009, 06:47 PM   #21
Saint Troy
First Line Centre
 
Saint Troy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

It will suck but it sure it looks like it is happening this summer. I will puke if I ever see Halladay in a Red Sox or Yanks uniform.
__________________

Saint Troy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2009, 07:02 PM   #22
bluejays
Franchise Player
 
bluejays's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moon View Post
If that's the requirement I don't see Halliday getting traded then.

Not sure why a team would want to trade a younger version of Halliday for 1.5 years of the older guy, plus add more pieces to the deal. If the Jays could get Lincecum right now for Halliday it would be a steal let alone a younger version plus others.

Also not sure why a team would give up, let alone even have, 2 sure fire MVP players.

But perhaps that is your plan to make the price so high that they don't move him.

Simple. Pitching is at a premium. This may as well be fact, but Halladay is known as one of the hardest working players in the league, is constantly in great condition, focused, never gets injured, helps the bullpen out tremendously by pitching the full 9, isn't a controversy magnet, is a Cy Young candidate every year, prime of his career, constant 20 game winner, great teammate and can almost lift a team about to get there over the top. It's not a homer statement to say there is really no other player at all like him around. As much as I like a guy like Utley or Longoria, or whomever gets mentioned in any rumor (not that any of those guys were mentioned), pitching is what they have to get back. I don't know if it'd be possible, but if Halladay could be had for David Price, it'd be something to look at.
bluejays is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2009, 07:45 PM   #23
xolager
Draft Pick
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Default

Why so quick to jettison the best athlete playing team sports in Canada?
xolager is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2009, 09:02 PM   #24
Jesse834
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Watching 7ungo Giving Up Goals A 5 Year Old Could Stop!
Exp:
Default

Trade Him Right Now
Jesse834 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2009, 09:34 PM   #25
moon
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fleury View Post
Simple. Pitching is at a premium. This may as well be fact, but Halladay is known as one of the hardest working players in the league, is constantly in great condition, focused, never gets injured, helps the bullpen out tremendously by pitching the full 9, isn't a controversy magnet, is a Cy Young candidate every year, prime of his career, constant 20 game winner, great teammate and can almost lift a team about to get there over the top. It's not a homer statement to say there is really no other player at all like him around. As much as I like a guy like Utley or Longoria, or whomever gets mentioned in any rumor (not that any of those guys were mentioned), pitching is what they have to get back. I don't know if it'd be possible, but if Halladay could be had for David Price, it'd be something to look at.
Pitching is at a premium I agree which is why I am confused as to why a team would trade a young guy like Lincecum who is basically Halliday except younger and cheaper. The player you get now gives you marginally better results and does so for a much shorter time.

Also not sure who has two sure fire MVP prospects, let alone is willing to give them up as well.

Halliday is one of the top players in the game for sure but is nowhere close to saying there is nobody else like him around.
moon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2009, 10:04 PM   #26
Pagal4321
Franchise Player
 
Pagal4321's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

There's no way a player like Lincecum comes back in a deal for Halladay, it's such backwards thinking.

It will be all prospects, either with little to no MLB experience, or a first/second year guys.

But teams will have to unload plenty of their prospects to get Halladay, every team knows that.

A sure fire, bonafied SS, a talented hitter and a pitcher.
Pagal4321 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2009, 10:22 PM   #27
Jason14h
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
There's no way a player like Lincecum comes back in a deal for Halladay, it's such backwards thinking
Well obviously there only one Lincecum right now in the league! However, 3 or 4 years ago you could have got him as a spect for a Doc type pitcher, despite the fact he was a 5 star prospect
Jason14h is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2009, 10:31 PM   #28
I wanna be like Miikka
#1 Goaltender
 
I wanna be like Miikka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I'm not a huge Jays fan but it pains me watching someone that talented play so many years on such a garbage team. I think he has put his time in and he deserves a shot in the playoffs.
I wanna be like Miikka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2009, 10:36 PM   #29
moon
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason14h View Post
Well obviously there only one Lincecum right now in the league! However, 3 or 4 years ago you could have got him as a spect for a Doc type pitcher, despite the fact he was a 5 star prospect
Does spect mean prospect? Is typing those 3 letters that tough?

A writer from Philly said that they would not give up their top pitching prospect for anyone so it really isn't that tough to think that the Giants wouldn't have given up a guy like Lincecum for Halliday when he was a prospect.

Teams are realizing that building from within is the best route to go and they aren't willing to give up their top guys nearly as often as they used to.

There may be a team or two that would be willing but for the most part teams aren't giving up pitching prospects even for a guy like Halliday.
moon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2009, 11:21 PM   #30
carom
Powerplay Quarterback
 
carom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The frozen surface of a fireball
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moon View Post
A writer from Philly said that they would not give up their top pitching prospect for anyone so it really isn't that tough to think that the Giants wouldn't have given up a guy like Lincecum for Halliday when he was a prospect.
As you stated, times have changed but i think i remember a trade rumour from a few years ago that Lincecum was going to be traded for Rios. Hindsight is a dog.
__________________
'When I use a word,' Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, 'it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.'
Quote:
Originally Posted by Icon View Post
dear god is he 14?
carom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2009, 11:27 PM   #31
moon
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by carom View Post
As you stated, times have changed but i think i remember a trade rumour from a few years ago that Lincecum was going to be traded for Rios. Hindsight is a dog.
Except it is widely known that the Giants weren't ever going to trade Lincecum in that deal and he was actually being used as bait to get the Jays in the deal and then swap out Lincecum with Matt Cain instead.

When the Jays wouldn't make the deal without Lincecum it died.
moon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to moon For This Useful Post:
Old 07-08-2009, 11:30 PM   #32
Sylvanfan
Appealing my suspension
 
Sylvanfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Just outside Enemy Lines
Exp:
Default

I thought I read this past off season that the Jays wanted Lincecum but the Giants were thinking about maybe offering Matt Cain. Can't remember where though, but it sounded like Lincecum was never something they were willing to think about. Although...if it was Cain, that would have been pretty solid too.

Chances are in a Halladay deal you could get a really good hitting prospect easily enough, but it's probably going to be tough to wrangle up great pitching prospects.
__________________
"Some guys like old balls"
Patriots QB Tom Brady
Sylvanfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2009, 01:07 AM   #33
carom
Powerplay Quarterback
 
carom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The frozen surface of a fireball
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sylvanfan View Post
Chances are in a Halladay deal you could get a really good hitting prospect easily enough, but it's probably going to be tough to wrangle up great pitching prospects.
I agree
__________________
'When I use a word,' Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, 'it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.'
Quote:
Originally Posted by Icon View Post
dear god is he 14?
carom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2009, 06:01 AM   #34
bluejays
Franchise Player
 
bluejays's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Exp:
Default

It all comes down to opinion, but I was watching TSN last night after the game and their "Insider" said if he were to get traded to the LAD, Kershaw would be the guy they'd start with in return. Sounds like a bonafide pitching prospect to me. I guess we'll agree to disagree, but IMO, there really isn't a single pitcher who is quite like Halladay overall. Lincecum really is the only one who may be like him, but nobody has his conditioning where he doesn't get injured, and plays 9 innings (essentially saving your bullpen 20% less work). That's huge.
bluejays is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2009, 09:44 AM   #35
Gozer
Not the one...
 
Gozer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

HALL - A - DAY people!
__________________
There's always two sides to an argument, and it's always a tie.
Gozer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2009, 04:06 PM   #36
Ziggy Lidstrom
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Ziggy Lidstrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Word on the street is that the team who will trade for Halladay has to take VW as well...
courtesy of focks sports (name changed for infringement purposes, am I paranoid trout?).

HOw about that? IF that happened then I'm okay with it. But what do u receive in return then, anything?
__________________
My Sig is terrible...le sigh
Ziggy Lidstrom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2009, 06:05 PM   #37
Sylvanfan
Appealing my suspension
 
Sylvanfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Just outside Enemy Lines
Exp:
Default

I can't see anyone wanting to take on a 20 million dollar guy minimum in Halladay and an 18 million dollar albatross. That would be a 40 million dollar budget hit for like 5 more years, which in these times is a pretty sizable monetary commitment. The Jays might take back like a 12 million dollar guy if Wells is in the deal, but still, the number of teams who can afford a contract for Halladay is limited as is. Add another guy like Wells to the equation and it's even less.
__________________
"Some guys like old balls"
Patriots QB Tom Brady
Sylvanfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2009, 06:14 PM   #38
Ziggy Lidstrom
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Ziggy Lidstrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Apparently LA dodge city is capable. They actually have a need in CF as they are not sold on kemp.

What about this trade:
Roy Halladay, Vernon Wells to LA

Juan Pierre, Clayton Kershaw, Kemp/Loney, 2 above average prospects, or one real good prospect to TOR
__________________
My Sig is terrible...le sigh
Ziggy Lidstrom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2009, 06:24 PM   #39
moon
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ziggy Lidstrom View Post
Apparently LA dodge city is capable. They actually have a need in CF as they are not sold on kemp.

What about this trade:
Roy Halladay, Vernon Wells to LA

Juan Pierre, Clayton Kershaw, Kemp/Loney, 2 above average prospects, or one real good prospect to TOR
If they are taking back Wells no way do they give up more than they would have to just to get Halladay on his own.

They may have questions about Kemp but he is a much better player than Wells at this point and no way near the anchor that Wells is.
moon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2009, 06:45 PM   #40
Ziggy Lidstrom
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Ziggy Lidstrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moon View Post
If they are taking back Wells no way do they give up more than they would have to just to get Halladay on his own.

They may have questions about Kemp but he is a much better player than Wells at this point and no way near the anchor that Wells is.
Let's face facts about wells. He's a two time allstar, three time gg winner and has had incredible seasons as a CF in the bigs. He was even being compared to a HOF CF in mr. mays, early as 2006 and was being mentioned as a HOF candidate himself. He hit 300 and 20 hr last year in a shortened effort. Not to forget, his contract is massive and that's why they are shopping him then.

This year is not without criticism for wells, but he still has a neutral trade value if you ask me. I feel that Juan Pierre would be a fine addition because he is being paid a lot to not play everyday and he is an "anchor" so to speak, so that almost cancels out wells.

And Kemp is not a "much" better player and has never hit more than 18 HR. He has a better avg and ops but wells isn't that far out of the discussion.
__________________
My Sig is terrible...le sigh
Ziggy Lidstrom is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:17 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy