I'm not a true expert, but my undergrad was psychology with emphasis on the more 'sciency' side like perception, neuropsych and experimental design and I think that photon's got it right. Our eyes constantly make saccadic movements to perceive the entire visual field, and large disparity in focus between the outer edges of the image and the central point can only mean two things. Either you're focussing on tiny objects fairly close to you at something close to your minimum focusing depth, or you're moving very quickly toward an object in the center of your visual field. Since the vestibular system is not sending any information that would lead you to believe you are moving the overall perception when you focus in on the areas of high focus is tiny objects close to you. You only notice the blurring when you look at the whole picture, and if you focus on the blurry part of the picture the effect is gone/diminished (to my eye at least).
I believe that is roughly the explanation from a neuropsychological perspective, but would defer to someone more expert than I. (Since I'm a lawyer now, it's been awhile) An interesting test would be to paralyze the eye muscles responsible for saccadic movements and then have the sujects view these pictures to see if the percepetion would change. This type of experimentation is fairly common in perceptual studies and may actually have been done somewhere. (But I couldn't find any mention)
__________________
onetwo and threefour... Together no more. The end of an era. Let's rebuild...
Last edited by onetwo_threefour; 11-17-2008 at 08:58 PM.
|