Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-10-2008, 09:56 AM   #21
Wookie
Chick Magnet
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Hmmm, should I jump in line before Iceland?
Wookie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2008, 10:13 AM   #22
mykalberta
Franchise Player
 
mykalberta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Why a country with 1/3 the population of Calgary has 3 banks is beyond me. Maybe the banks in Iceland should take a good long look in the mirror and blame themselves and not anyone else. None of Canada's banks have gone bellyup yet.

I feel sorry for the guy in the email about not being able to buy pasta but have no sympathy at all for the banks. They found a niche and likely exploited it, and now that niche is closing. And what should happen is that stronger banks pick the carcasses of the smaller banks.
__________________
MYK - Supports Arizona to democtratically pass laws for the state of Arizona
Rudy was the only hope in 08
2011 Election: Cons 40% - Nanos 38% Ekos 34%
mykalberta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2008, 10:36 AM   #23
Daradon
Has lived the dream!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Where I lay my head is home...
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mykalberta View Post
Why a country with 1/3 the population of Calgary has 3 banks is beyond me. Maybe the banks in Iceland should take a good long look in the mirror and blame themselves and not anyone else. None of Canada's banks have gone bellyup yet.

I feel sorry for the guy in the email about not being able to buy pasta but have no sympathy at all for the banks. They found a niche and likely exploited it, and now that niche is closing. And what should happen is that stronger banks pick the carcasses of the smaller banks.
There are no stronger banks.

But you are probably right about the fact that in a country with such a small population, the banks shouldn't be investing in such risky investments. However, the people of Iceland are the real victims here. It's easy to say you don't feel sorry for the banks, but it hurts everyone.
Daradon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2008, 11:25 AM   #24
mykalberta
Franchise Player
 
mykalberta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daradon View Post
There are no stronger banks.

But you are probably right about the fact that in a country with such a small population, the banks shouldn't be investing in such risky investments. However, the people of Iceland are the real victims here. It's easy to say you don't feel sorry for the banks, but it hurts everyone.
There are stronger banks, maybe not in Iceland but there are banks able to swallow up their profitable assets. Iceland needs to realize what it is in the world. It is a country of less than 350K people. Some decisions need to be made as to what needs to be nationalized in Iceland and what doesnt - its much like Canada's decision to do with its armed forces, how large or modern does a country of 35 mil and a very small player on the world stage army need to be.

How solvent is the country of Iceland? Do they have any gold reserves - one would think that an almost pure importer of everything would need gold on hand to guarantee the continuation of imports. If the country has no reserves of cash or gold then its their own fault and probably their resource assets will be put up for sale quickly.

The food shortages sound like gouging to me personally. Food prices will soon be if not already tanking because of the price of oil. Foods phenomenal rise over the last while has been because of the price of oil and only that. Which is why I think everyone and their dog should have gotten out of all food and food related industries (fertilizer) etc when oil was close to $150. I did and moved my money into 70% ING and 30% company stock. Now today that 30% is now 10% and I moved 1/2 my ING money into more company stocks cause my companies (the company I work for) fundamentals are very strong.
__________________
MYK - Supports Arizona to democtratically pass laws for the state of Arizona
Rudy was the only hope in 08
2011 Election: Cons 40% - Nanos 38% Ekos 34%
mykalberta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2008, 11:19 AM   #25
Locke
Franchise Player
 
Locke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
Exp:
Default

My economics professor told us a joke in class today that I thought was pretty funny:

What is the Capital of Iceland? (answer in white font, so highlight it)

$6.25

He followed that gem up with these two:

What's the difference between a stripper and New York Investment Banker?

Now, a stripper can still afford the deposit on a new Porsche

and:

What's the difference between a homeless alcoholic and a New York Investment Banker?

Nothing.

Just thought I'd share my University educated morning with y'all.
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!

This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.

The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans

If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
Locke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2008, 12:00 PM   #26
Iowa_Flames_Fan
Referee
 
Iowa_Flames_Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Over the hill
Exp:
Default

That's pretty good--but I think your prof was highballing the price a little.

Apparently, the nation of Iceland was briefly for sale on ebay, with an opening bid of $1.95. Could have been a real bargain, but some spoilsport took it down.

Of course, in that case what really kills you is the shipping costs.
Iowa_Flames_Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2008, 12:03 PM   #27
badnarik
Crash and Bang Winger
 
badnarik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: san diego
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mykalberta View Post
The food shortages sound like gouging to me personally. Food prices will soon be if not already tanking because of the price of oil. Foods phenomenal rise over the last while has been because of the price of oil and only that. Which is why I think everyone and their dog should have gotten out of all food and food related industries (fertilizer) etc when oil was close to $150. I did and moved my money into 70% ING and 30% company stock. Now today that 30% is now 10% and I moved 1/2 my ING money into more company stocks cause my companies (the company I work for) fundamentals are very strong.
If they have a shortage of food, then prices aren't high enough.
badnarik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2008, 12:12 PM   #28
Fozzie_DeBear
Wucka Wocka Wacka
 
Fozzie_DeBear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: East of the Rockies, West of the Rest
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke View Post
My economics professor told us a joke in class today that I thought was pretty funny:

What is the Capital of Iceland? (answer in white font, so highlight it)

$6.25

He followed that gem up with these two:

What's the difference between a stripper and New York Investment Banker?

Now, a stripper can still afford the deposit on a new Porsche

and:

What's the difference between a homeless alcoholic and a New York Investment Banker?

Nothing.

Just thought I'd share my University educated morning with y'all.

Heard this one?

How many stockbrokers does it take to change a lightbulb?

Two-One to take out the bulb and drop it and one who tries to sell the bulb before it crashes
__________________
"WHAT HAVE WE EVER DONE TO DESERVE THIS??? WHAT IS WRONG WITH US????" -Oiler Fan

"It was a debacle of monumental proportions." -MacT
Fozzie_DeBear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2008, 01:57 PM   #29
Table 5
Franchise Player
 
Table 5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NYYC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mykalberta View Post
I did and moved my money into 70% ING and 30% company stock. Now today that 30% is now 10% and I moved 1/2 my ING money into more company stocks cause my companies (the company I work for) fundamentals are very strong.
Im no financial expert, but having 65% of your assets in the stock of one company sounds really damn risky. Remember, a lot of people though Enron had strong fundamentals too.

As Cramer says...diversity is the only free lunch.
Table 5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2008, 03:11 PM   #30
tvp2003
Franchise Player
 
tvp2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Wow. And I though times were scary in the US...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke View Post
Finally getting their comeuppance. That'll learn 'em for trying to take on the Mighty Ducks with their cheap antics!!
tvp2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:23 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy