This is strange, to be sure. It's hard to imagine being aroused by inanimate objects. It's not even really a fetish, as a fetish is an object that one needs to achieve sexual stimulation with another person (or oneself).
On the other hand, though, I wonder what this signals about the limits (or lack thereof) of affection and desire. There's no reason to think desire for sexual objects necessarily precludes sexual desire for other people (though it looks to often be the case here)...
I wonder if desire is this unquenchable thirst inside of us that just gets culturally circuited and limited into 'human sexuality' but is, in fact, much broader and vast than we realize.
__________________
The great CP is in dire need of prunes! 
"That's because the productive part of society is adverse to giving up all their wealth so you libs can conduct your social experiments. Experience tells us your a bunch of snake oil salesman...Sucks to be you." ~Calgaryborn 12/06/09 keeping it really stupid!
|
