Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-02-2008, 08:38 PM   #21
photon
The new goggles also do nothing.
 
photon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

It depends on where you draw the line. The troposphere is only 8 to 16 km thick, and the stratosphere goes up to 60km.
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
photon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2008, 08:47 PM   #22
octothorp
Franchise Player
 
octothorp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: not lurking
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by photon View Post
It depends on where you draw the line. The troposphere is only 8 to 16 km thick, and the stratosphere goes up to 60km.
Yeah, not to nitpick but they said atmosphere, which includes the thermosphere, which is measured in the hundreds of kms. Obviously if they choose to just show a quarter of the atmosphere, then they can make a surprisingly small ball, but it's not accurate. My estimate was actually extremely conservative, and one could easily argue that it should be over 20 times the volume of their sphere.
octothorp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2008, 09:02 PM   #23
photon
The new goggles also do nothing.
 
photon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Yeah, you could count up to 500km out or more.
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
photon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2008, 11:32 PM   #24
evman150
#1 Goaltender
 
evman150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Richmond, BC
Exp:
Default

I did some very rough back of the envelope calculations and came up with a sphere of radius 800km containing two billion cubic km of water. I used a mean water depth of 5km.

Sounds about right. The 6000 number for the radius of the earth makes the numbers easier and it makes up for the surface area of the land, so they sort of cancel out a bit.

__________________
"For thousands of years humans were oppressed - as some of us still are - by the notion that the universe is a marionette whose strings are pulled by a god or gods, unseen and inscrutable." - Carl Sagan
Freedom consonant with responsibility.

evman150 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2008, 11:43 PM   #25
T@T
Lifetime Suspension
 
T@T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Exp:
Default

Looks about right, i remember in school that the mass of the atmosphere was roughly twice that of water and water makes up roughly 0.02% of the the earths mass.
T@T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2008, 01:08 PM   #26
SebC
tromboner
 
SebC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
Exp:
Default

If the ball contains all the water, then why are Greenland and the Arctic white?
SebC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2008, 01:25 PM   #27
RougeUnderoos
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Clinching Party
Exp:
Default

http://chamorrobible.org/images/phot...1025-large.jpg

Cool and somewhat topical photo of the space shuttle taken from the ISS.
__________________

RougeUnderoos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2008, 01:38 PM   #28
CrusaderPi
Redundant Minister of Redundancy
Self-Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Exp:
Default

That's not topical at all. Freaking cool though.
CrusaderPi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2008, 01:50 PM   #29
RougeUnderoos
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Clinching Party
Exp:
Default

nm
__________________

RougeUnderoos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2008, 10:03 PM   #30
RougeUnderoos
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Clinching Party
Exp:
Default

Another one.

http://chamorrobible.org/images/phot...1-19950629.jpg
__________________

RougeUnderoos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2008, 01:03 AM   #31
Cube Inmate
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Boxed-in
Exp:
Default

I didn't check the assumptions behind those pictures, but if you compressed all of the upper atmosphere into the volume it would occupy at 1 ATM of pressure, then perhaps that's what they're getting at. Obviously that would be much smaller than the actual "volume" of the atmosphere...which is really quite unlimited when you include the expansion at low pressure.

My $0.02.

As for the water, my guess was that the "ball" would be about 1/3 of the size it is....but I was wrong. The oceans are very, very shallow compared with their area. The Pacific is more than 15,000 km wide, and no deeper than 11 km at its lowest point. That's 0.07% ... like someone said, like the skin of an apple.

Quote:
Originally Posted by octothorp View Post
Yeah, not to nitpick but they said atmosphere, which includes the thermosphere, which is measured in the hundreds of kms. Obviously if they choose to just show a quarter of the atmosphere, then they can make a surprisingly small ball, but it's not accurate. My estimate was actually extremely conservative, and one could easily argue that it should be over 20 times the volume of their sphere.

Last edited by Cube Inmate; 02-06-2008 at 01:12 AM.
Cube Inmate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2008, 09:56 AM   #32
Flashpoint
Not the 1 millionth post winnar
 
Flashpoint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Exp:
Default

If all the water on earth is in that little ball, then how come Greenland is covered in snow? Or is ice excluded?
__________________
"Isles give up 3 picks for 5.5 mil of cap space.

Oilers give up a pick and a player to take on 5.5 mil."
-Bax
Flashpoint is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2008, 10:07 AM   #33
photon
The new goggles also do nothing.
 
photon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Probably just an oversight on whoever made the image.
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
photon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2008, 10:19 AM   #34
SaskaBushFire
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

My guess was right on I guessed that exact diameter.

However I just did those calculations in a Geog lab about 2 hours ago
__________________
GO GREEN!
SaskaBushFire is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:01 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy