Kerry Concedes

[MrMastodonFarm]

Originally posted by albertGQ@Nov 3 2004, 01:27 PM
Don't worry. There won't be anymore. MMF keeps dodging my question even though I answer every single one of his

Unless I missed a question -- which I might have, the thread moved along very quickly -- I beleive I answered all of your insane "what if" questions. You should be lucky I addressed any of them. When a person doesn't have a leg to stand on they usually turn to the What If arguement as means to try to get off the what is being discussed. Your attempt at that was pretty good I must say.

[albertGQ]

Originally posted by MrMastodonFarm+Nov 3 2004, 12:32 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (MrMastodonFarm @ Nov 3 2004, 12:32 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-albertGQ@Nov 3 2004, 01:27 PM
Don't worry. There won't be anymore. MMF keeps dodging my question even though I answer every single one of his

Unless I missed a question -- which I might have, the thread moved along very quickly -- I beleive I answered all of your insane "what if" questions. You should be lucky I addressed any of them. When a person doesn't have a leg to stand on they usually turn to the What If arguement as means to try to get off the what is being discussed. Your attempt at that was pretty good I must say. [/b][/quote]
Okay, well your ONLY arguement for allowing gay marriages is that it is between two loving individuals and it does not affect us directly and them having sex does not result in deformed babies.

My question is this:

Mom is 50 years old, in menopause
Son is 30 years old. Sterile. CEO of a blue chip company. University graduate. MBA in business.

Both have been proven medically sane.

They are both individuals that are madly deeply in love with each other. What they do in the privacy of their own home does not affect you at all. Them having sex can not result in any deformed babies because of the reasons I mentioned above.

Would you or would you not be against this marriage???

[Bertuzzied]

Originally posted by albertGQ+Nov 3 2004, 09:04 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (albertGQ @ Nov 3 2004, 09:04 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>

Unless I missed a question -- which I might have, the thread moved along very quickly -- I beleive I answered all of your insane "what if" questions. You should be lucky I addressed any of them. When a person doesn't have a leg to stand on they usually turn to the What If arguement as means to try to get off the what is being discussed. Your attempt at that was pretty good I must say.

Okay, well your ONLY arguement for allowing gay marriages is that it is between two loving individuals and it does not affect us directly and them having sex does not result in deformed babies.

My question is this:

Mom is 50 years old, in menopause
Son is 30 years old. Sterile. CEO of a blue chip company. University graduate. MBA in business.

Both have been proven medically sane.

They are both individuals that are madly deeply in love with each other. What they do in the privacy of their own home does not affect you at all. Them having sex can not result in any deformed babies because of the reasons I mentioned above.

Would you or would you not be against this marriage??? [/b][/quote]
What! This incest talk has spread over 2 topics now. I think you should have a pm war with Mr Farm instead.

[MrMastodonFarm]

Originally posted by albertGQ@Nov 3 2004, 03:04 PM
Would you or would you not be against this marriage???

Didn't I say above I'm not playing your what if game any longer?

[albertGQ]

Originally posted by Bertuzzied+Nov 3 2004, 02:12 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Bertuzzied @ Nov 3 2004, 02:12 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>

Okay, well your ONLY arguement for allowing gay marriages is that it is between two loving individuals and it does not affect us directly and them having sex does not result in deformed babies.

My question is this:

Mom is 50 years old, in menopause
Son is 30 years old. Sterile. CEO of a blue chip company. University graduate. MBA in business.

Both have been proven medically sane.

They are both individuals that are madly deeply in love with each other. What they do in the privacy of their own home does not affect you at all. Them having sex can not result in any deformed babies because of the reasons I mentioned above.

Would you or would you not be against this marriage???

What! This incest talk has spread over 2 topics now. I think you should have a pm war with Mr Farm instead. [/b][/quote]
I just want him to answer that question first and I'll stop. I've answered every single question of his and he keeps dodging this one

[albertGQ]

Originally posted by MrMastodonFarm+Nov 3 2004, 02:18 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (MrMastodonFarm @ Nov 3 2004, 02:18 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-albertGQ@Nov 3 2004, 03:04 PM
Would you or would you not be against this marriage???

Didn't I say above I'm not playing your what if game any longer? [/b][/quote]
Okay. I will take it you won't answer. Fine. I'll drop it now. Just admit I stumped you with that scenario

[MrMastodonFarm]

Originally posted by albertGQ@Nov 3 2004, 03:21 PM
Okay. I will take it you won't answer. Fine. I'll drop it now. Just admit I stumped you with that scenario

Your scenario isn't real and I've answered enough of your made up situations, it grows oh so tiresome. What you and I were talking about in another thread was, and get this.. it was real. I have no time to debate your fabricated stories.

[Pagal4321]

Oh I thought this was a thread to talk about Kerry conceding.....I'm sure all of us have had enough of you two going back and forth, use pm's.

This was the right thing to do by Kerry, even though I really did want him to win. That 100,000+ deficit had a very slim chance of going his way.
Anyone hear his speech?

[albertGQ]

Originally posted by MrMastodonFarm+Nov 3 2004, 02:23 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (MrMastodonFarm @ Nov 3 2004, 02:23 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-albertGQ@Nov 3 2004, 03:21 PM
Okay. I will take it you won't answer. Fine. I'll drop it now. Just admit I stumped you with that scenario

Your scenario isn't real and I've answered enough of your made up situations, it grows oh so tiresome. What you and I were talking about in another thread was, and get this.. it was real. I have no time to debate your fabricated stories. [/b][/quote]
So are you saying my above scenario can NEVER happen?

[MrMastodonFarm]

Originally posted by Pagal4321@Nov 3 2004, 03:26 PM
Oh I thought this was a thread to talk about Kerry conceding.....I'm sure all of us have had enough of you two going back and forth, use pm's.

When were you appointed a moderator?

[MrMastodonFarm]

Originally posted by albertGQ@Nov 3 2004, 03:27 PM
So are you saying my above scenario can NEVER happen?

Fine. I'll drop it now.

[FlamesAddiction]

Personally, I wouldn't care. What people do behind closed doors is their business as long as they are consenting adults. I don't have to like it, and in fact, the above scenerio is repulsive, but my freedom and lifestyle would still endure. I would also choose not to associate with such people.

[Pagal4321]

Originally posted by MrMastodonFarm+Nov 3 2004, 03:29 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (MrMastodonFarm @ Nov 3 2004, 03:29 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Pagal4321@Nov 3 2004, 03:26 PM
Oh I thought this was a thread to talk about Kerry conceding.....I'm sure all of us have had enough of you two going back and forth, use pm's.

When were you appointed a moderator? [/b][/quote]
I am not a moderator, simply sick of seeing the same argument come up in multiple topics. How about we get back on topic so people wanting to read about Kerry conceding don't have to skip over half the thread.

[MrMastodonFarm]

Originally posted by Pagal4321@Nov 3 2004, 03:36 PM
I am not a moderator,

Then don't act like one, and don't tell me to bring a discussion to pm's ever again.

[Flames Draft Watcher]

Originally posted by MrMastodonFarm+Nov 3 2004, 09:29 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (MrMastodonFarm @ Nov 3 2004, 09:29 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>

When were you appointed a moderator? [/b]

Funny dude is only doing the same thing you just did earlier today...


<!--QuoteBegin-MrMastodonFarm@Nov 3 2004, 06:57 PM
Why even bring up this personal p*ssing match on the board?

If you two want to pull out each others wanks and have a sword fight then go ahead, but don't make the rest of us watch. [/quote]

And no, I won't go ###### myself.

[MrMastodonFarm]

Originally posted by Flames Draft Watcher@Nov 3 2004, 03:39 PM
Funny dude is only doing the same thing you just did earlier today...

Ya, but I said the word wanks.

Advantage - Adam.

[Flame On]

Originally posted by albertGQ+Nov 3 2004, 02:04 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (albertGQ @ Nov 3 2004, 02:04 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>

Unless I missed a question -- which I might have, the thread moved along very quickly -- I beleive I answered all of your insane "what if" questions. You should be lucky I addressed any of them. When a person doesn't have a leg to stand on they usually turn to the What If arguement as means to try to get off the what is being discussed. Your attempt at that was pretty good I must say.

Okay, well your ONLY arguement for allowing gay marriages is that it is between two loving individuals and it does not affect us directly and them having sex does not result in deformed babies.

My question is this:

Mom is 50 years old, in menopause
Son is 30 years old. Sterile. CEO of a blue chip company. University graduate. MBA in business.

Both have been proven medically sane.

They are both individuals that are madly deeply in love with each other. What they do in the privacy of their own home does not affect you at all. Them having sex can not result in any deformed babies because of the reasons I mentioned above.

Would you or would you not be against this marriage??? [/b][/quote]
You are a fool. Your scenario, which you're a bit too obsessed with, is an illegal one. Homosexuality is not. Any scenario you think of that is illegal is not being touted as becoming legal. Gay marriage is, because it's neither illegal, criminal or wrong. Homosexuality is a...sexuality, incest is a condition or mental disturbance.
According to the bible you have cast the first stone, in sitting in judgement over this group of people. You have deemed their way of life to be wrong where obviously you are flawless...
So according to the tennants that you're obviously holding to, you should be enjoying a good warm afterlife....

[albertGQ]

You are a fool. Your scenario, which you're a bit too obsessed with, is an illegal one. Homosexuality is not. Any scenario you think of that is illegal is not being touted as becoming legal. Gay marriage is, because it's neither illegal, criminal or wrong. Homosexuality is a...sexuality, incest is a condition or mental disturbance.
According to the bible you have cast the first stone, in sitting in judgement over this group of people. You have deemed their way of life to be wrong where obviously you are flawless...
So according to the tennants that you're obviously holding to, you should be enjoying a good warm afterlife....

Same conditions are applied for both scenarios. Just because its illegal does not make it wrong (I do think its wrong though, just like homosexuality). But you're arguement of it being illegal makes it wrong is not valid.

Slavery has been legal for a long long time throughout mankind. Are you saying that for all those years it was right and as soon as it became illegal, all of a sudden it became wrong?

IMO Incest and homosexuality is a condition and/or a mental disturbance

[MrMastodonFarm]

Originally posted by albertGQ@Nov 3 2004, 03:52 PM
homosexuality is a condition and/or a mental disturbance

Honestly, have you ever enjoyed a good girl on girl porn?

You probably have, and loved every second of it.

[albertGQ]

Originally posted by MrMastodonFarm+Nov 3 2004, 02:55 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (MrMastodonFarm @ Nov 3 2004, 02:55 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-albertGQ@Nov 3 2004, 03:52 PM
homosexuality is a condition and/or a mental disturbance

Honestly, have you ever enjoyed a good girl on girl porn?

You probably have, and loved every second of it. [/b][/quote]
You got me there. At least I can admit it.

Lesbians are okay and ******s are not. IMO

Call me closed-minded when it comes to homosexuality, but thats the way I am