Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-26-2007, 02:55 PM   #21
Dion
Not a casual user
 
Dion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: A simple man leading a complicated life....
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarchHare View Post
The nature of an all-volunteer military is that it doesn't tend to attract highly-educated people from wealthy families (particularly in the combat arms branches, such as the infantry). Of course there are exceptions to this, but the grunts on the ground armed with rifles (i.e. the ones most in danger of being killed in Iraq) by and large are not university-educated and come from lower-income families. More often than not, the children of senators and congressmen don't fit that profile.
###.

"it is well known that to fill the ranks of enlisted soldiers, sailors and Marines, the Pentagon draws heavily on the bottom half of the nation's income distribution, favoring in its hunt for recruits schools in low-income neighborhoods."

Or how about social welfare economics as another explanation?

"Only slightly more crudely put, the central idea underlying this theorem of what economists call "social welfare economics" is that if a nation must use human bodies to stop bullets and shrapnel, it ought to use relatively "low-cost" bodies -- that is, predominantly those who would otherwise not have produced much gross domestic product, the main component of what economists call "social opportunity costs." On this rationale, economists certify the all-volunteer army as efficient and thus good."

"Small wonder, then, that even college students who ardently supported the invasion of Iraq and just as ardently favor "staying the course" in Iraq argue smugly that, instead of serving their country in uniform, they can serve it so much better in law school or by trading bonds for Goldman Sachs."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...110301372.html
Dion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2007, 03:19 PM   #22
mykalberta
Franchise Player
 
mykalberta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava View Post
That would be the only way I suppose. I don't quite know if they should cut and run but if they were to, that would be the only way.
The only problem is with the number of embedded reporters there, they would know something is up. I would start moving troops closer and closer to the Saud border then one night cross it and never come back.

The American public doesnt equate 9-11 to the Iraq War, simple as that and they dont have the stomach for it. I think they are even tiring on Afghanistan and the complete failure that mission had been. They should have been wiped off the face of the map by now, who cares what Pakistan says about there un watched borders.

MYK
mykalberta is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:02 PM.

Calgary Flames
2025-26






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy