Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-27-2007, 04:17 PM   #21
Bobblehead
Franchise Player
 
Bobblehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: in your blind spot.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Devils'Advocate View Post
*ding* *ding* *ding* And *THAT* is the right answer.

Quebecers are pissed off at inept PQ and Liberal governments doing everything they can to ignore the real needs of the province.

I live in Ottawa, so I work with many people from Gatineau and they seemed to be of the same opinion - the ADQ do not represent the world view of most people from the province; they simply were a protest vote against two parties that did nothing but drive the province further into the hole that they have been trying to climb out of for over a century.
That is exactly how Bob Rae came to power in Ontario.
__________________
"The problem with any ideology is that it gives the answer before you look at the evidence."
—Bill Clinton
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance--it is the illusion of knowledge."
—Daniel J. Boorstin, historian, former Librarian of Congress
"But the Senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity"
—WKRP in Cincinatti
Bobblehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2007, 09:26 PM   #22
Winsor_Pilates
Franchise Player
 
Winsor_Pilates's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Van City - Main St.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FanIn80 View Post
The media often uses statistical formulae on election nights to "predict" the winners. Sometimes you get certain "gung-ho" outlets that like to run with those predictions.

All-in-all... this has to look good for the Conservatives, and maybe put a little fear into Dion.

(yes, I know this was a provincial election)
Maybe I'm missing something about Quebec politics, but why would a "liberal" victory in Quebec scare the "Liberal" party of Canada?
Winsor_Pilates is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2007, 04:43 PM   #23
GirlySports
NOT breaking news
 
GirlySports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Winsor_Pilates View Post
Maybe I'm missing something about Quebec politics, but why would a "liberal" victory in Quebec scare the "Liberal" party of Canada?
Cause the liberals went from 73 seats to 46!
The only winner on the night were the right-wing ADQ which definately scares Dion!

BTW, those who are wondering how Charest made up so much ground at the end of the night.. that's when they counted the advanced voting and he made a killing there.
__________________
Watching the Oilers defend is like watching fire engines frantically rushing to the wrong fire

GirlySports is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2007, 09:26 PM   #24
RedHot25
Franchise Player
 
RedHot25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Probably stuck driving someone somewhere
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GirlySports View Post
Cause the liberals went from 73 seats to 46!
The only winner on the night were the right-wing ADQ which definately scares Dion!.
But isn't Charest more conservative than liberal? Charest is rightish, and Mario is definately right. I believe?

Last edited by RedHot25; 03-28-2007 at 09:33 PM.
RedHot25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2007, 10:43 PM   #25
Bobblehead
Franchise Player
 
Bobblehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: in your blind spot.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedHot25 View Post
But isn't Charest more conservative than liberal? Charest is rightish, and Mario is definately right. I believe?
Charest was leader of the federal PC party from '93 to '98 until he left to run the Quebec Liberal Party.

The Liberal Party in Quebec seems to be more a federalist party that runs in opposition to the PQ, as opposed to a traditional Liberal party in the vein of the federal Liberals.
__________________
"The problem with any ideology is that it gives the answer before you look at the evidence."
—Bill Clinton
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance--it is the illusion of knowledge."
—Daniel J. Boorstin, historian, former Librarian of Congress
"But the Senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity"
—WKRP in Cincinatti
Bobblehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2007, 11:09 AM   #26
GirlySports
NOT breaking news
 
GirlySports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobblehead View Post
Charest was leader of the federal PC party from '93 to '98 until he left to run the Quebec Liberal Party.

The Liberal Party in Quebec seems to be more a federalist party that runs in opposition to the PQ, as opposed to a traditional Liberal party in the vein of the federal Liberals.
That is correct. Quebec is one of the unique places in the world where the politics were not based on left and right or by issues. It is based one 1 simple question. Whether to be with Canada or not. This election clearly shows that people do not want to seperate and want to finally discuss the issues. What will the PQ become if people no longer are interested in the Unity question. Would it become the NDP?
__________________
Watching the Oilers defend is like watching fire engines frantically rushing to the wrong fire

GirlySports is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2007, 11:28 AM   #27
BlackEleven
Redundant Minister of Redundancy
 
BlackEleven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Montreal
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GirlySports View Post
That is correct. Quebec is one of the unique places in the world where the politics were not based on left and right or by issues. It is based one 1 simple question. Whether to be with Canada or not. This election clearly shows that people do not want to seperate and want to finally discuss the issues. What will the PQ become if people no longer are interested in the Unity question. Would it become the NDP?
Althought it does play a big part, I think its a little naive to say that all Quebec politics are based entirely on a yes or no question. If that were the case, only two parties would exist in Quebec -- the PQ for separation and the Liberals against.

On each side of the solidarity question you have left and right parties. On the pro-separation side you have the left leaning Quebec Solidaire and the mostly-left PQ and on the anti-seperation side you have the right-leaning ADQ and the less-right-leaning Liberals.

As far as the PQ being like the NDP, I don't think that is the case. Within the PQ party there are both left and right leaning people, so if the solidarity question goes away this party would likely cease to exist as they have very little common ground other than the fact they want to separate.
BlackEleven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2007, 12:58 PM   #28
RedHot25
Franchise Player
 
RedHot25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Probably stuck driving someone somewhere
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GirlySports View Post
That is correct. Quebec is one of the unique places in the world where the politics were not based on left and right or by issues. It is based one 1 simple question. Whether to be with Canada or not.

What will the PQ become if people no longer are interested in the Unity question. Would it become the NDP?
Point #1 I disagree - look at issues surrounding immigration, for example.

I don't think the PQ would be the NDP. Are they not actually socially conservativ i think?

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackEleven View Post
Althought it does play a big part, I think its a little naive to say that all Quebec politics are based entirely on a yes or no question. If that were the case, only two parties would exist in Quebec -- the PQ for separation and the Liberals against.

On each side of the solidarity question you have left and right parties. On the pro-separation side you have the left leaning Quebec Solidaire and the mostly-left PQ and on the anti-seperation side you have the right-leaning ADQ and the less-right-leaning Liberals.

As far as the PQ being like the NDP, I don't think that is the case. Within the PQ party there are both left and right leaning people, so if the solidarity question goes away this party would likely cease to exist as they have very little common ground other than the fact they want to separate.
Ahh BlackEleven you did a much better job than me.

that's interesting re: the PQ...I've always had them pegged a bit more centre-right. Learn something every day. Although by the sounds of it, it seems that they are kind of a mix and mash of every political stripe in a sense.
RedHot25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:58 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy