Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-03-2007, 04:16 AM   #21
hurricanephoenix
Draft Pick
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: In a town
Default

Hi all, Ive been reading your informative thread because Im thinking of signing on with a reserve fund of $1000 tomorrow at 1230pm in order to purchase a condo in the Haiku building (17th ave and 12st NW).
At 550 sq ft $260,000 seems like a frick of a lot even in todays booming market. It is a block away from SAIT and a beautiful condo. Ive been searching for about 3 months and have seen some good and a lot of bad. Now feeling the crunch of time and the prices go up Im looking for some advice or past experience with this situation. I know its a lot of cash, but is it too much? Thanks for your input. ~hurri
hurricanephoenix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2007, 09:50 AM   #22
killer_carlson
Franchise Player
 
killer_carlson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Be sure you read the documents and understand everything that is in them. Check out resources on the CCI website.

DO NOT have as a condition that your lawyer has to review the documents. It is your decision to make. Your lawyer is not investing for you and you can ask him to help you understand certain bits, but do your own homework on this.

At least this way you'll know what is coming down the pipe.

Something else to have a look at is the rate of return on the reserve fund study plan. Make sure that the plan you've been given doesn't have a 7% rate of return on the investments in the fund. Very few condo boards are organized enough to invest as per the Regulations and most have their money in a GIC earning 3.5 % or so. Suddenly 3 years later you're now behind in your savings and the hits the fan.
__________________
"OOOOOOHHHHHHH those Russians" - Boney M
killer_carlson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2007, 02:00 AM   #23
hurricanephoenix
Draft Pick
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: In a town
Hey killer and all, Just want to thank you for your input. I have since bought a condo in Varsity Village. Its older but its bigger and I believe Ill be happy there. Thanks again and good luck! ~hurri

Last edited by hurricanephoenix; 05-09-2007 at 02:15 AM.
hurricanephoenix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2007, 04:32 AM   #24
SeeGeeWhy
#1 Goaltender
 
SeeGeeWhy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

The management company is just as important as the developer when considering a condo conversion. Go with those who have good track records and reputations.

Never buy Pointe of View, even if it is brand new. My mother works in the insurance business and they get more claims put in against their new buildings within the first few years after completion than any other developer she sees. They are nothing but problems.

260k is pretty pricey, but your location is great. You will always be able to rent that out to a student, or as a small executive suite. DO NOT SELL. That gets more true the closer to the core you get, even if it is a condo.

Re: The News on Broadcast Hill. I am not entirely sure of their operational history, but they were built in 1986 to house the media for the olympics. They were modularly built and have post tensioned cable in the concrete used to build the parking structure (as most concrete buildings that were put up in the 80s do).

That said, the developers look like they did a pretty decent job of renovating the units. They have sold phase one out completely as of last year (2005), and the new phase is going for roughly 30% more than what they sold for at the time (about 210 to 275 for comparable floorplans being sold today vs last year). They will be releasing more units gradually until the year end.

The view is great and there is a bit of greenspace.

BUT

There is obvious water damage in the structure which is very concerning. We were fortunate enough to get a chance to see a unit that had been bought out from the pool by one of the cotractors doing the renovations and he did what was probably the world's reno on the place. He would have been better off to pay a hobo to live in it for a month and then try to sell it as is with poo all over the house. Yikes.

But at any rate, it was on MLS before they got the chance to work on the rest of the building, and boy was it ugly. Severe water damage was present from the (broken) skylights all the way down to tbe bottom (and the buildings are 3 stories tall). There were obvious cracks in the drywall, stains and mold on the outside.

Thankfully we saw all of this or else we might have gone ahead with buying one of the units that was being sold by the developer.

When I asked if they would allow me to conduct an inspection on the building, they said that they do not as it is part of their permit process and they have already conducted all the building inspections that are required. I thought this was a load of crap so I asked to see a copy of the inspection report, and she said that they didn't have it anymore*. So I just came out and asked her about the water damage. She admitted that there had been places where they had to strip down the walls to the framing and in some spots even had to reconstruct the framing in order to remedy the water damage issues.

I asked if they were guaranteeing or warranteeing the work done on the water damage and they were not. Since the skylights and walls are considered common property, any future work needed to deal with any sort of water damage realted issues would be dealt with via assessment. The other beauty thing is that they hadn't worked out if such assessments would be charged on a building to building basis, or if the entire development would pitch in.

So there would be a chance that if there were some privately held units in the buildings (which there are) that decided not to participate with the water damage repair work that the developers were doing, it could cause problems down the road for the people who own as part of the condo agreement.

* - Oh, and for the record, the City of Calgary keeps all of the building inspections submitted on file and will be able to produce them for you in about a week for $100. Just go to the property research division on the 2nd floor and immediately to the right. Talk to Roxanne Wales or Connie Chung (? - seriously, I think that is her name).

They have obviously sunk a lot of money into this refurbishment if you look closely enough at the documents that are provided.

We decided not to go for it as we are already in the condo market in our place downtown. We are now instead looking around for a small single family house, townhouse, duplex or fourplex in a few of the older areas (montgomery, Bowness, tuxedo, mount pleasant, cresent heights, etc). Listings so far have been anywhere from 260 - 425k for what we are looking at, and 400 is probably the highest I want to go. Needs at least 2 bed and 1+ bath.

There is a real possibility that we will be looking for a 50% partner to rent out our downtown unit when we move. Rough numbers look like 150 - 160 to buy in to half of the condo value, with rental potential of 1300 - 1500 per month, underground parking available and can be included in the rental agreement. PM me if you are interested in this opportunity or have a house for sale that might fit the description noted above.


*ahem* Photon *ahem*
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biff View Post
If the NHL ever needs an enema, Edmonton is where they'll insert it.
SeeGeeWhy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:36 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy