Quote:
Originally posted by Agamemnon+Oct 16 2004, 03:57 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Agamemnon @ Oct 16 2004, 03:57 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-sjwalter@Oct 16 2004, 10:50 PM
I don't understand what you mean with assertions.# The only assertion i've made is that everything i said is what the media came up with.
Call it fact or opinion, but i won't deny thats its the truth.
|
Glad to oblige :P
In this thread you've made assertions. You've 'recalled' that Kerry was involved in atrocities. This 'recollection' is spurious. You've heard there are allegations that he 'did something bad', and you've apparently guessed that he was involved in a massacre. Unless you mean by 'atrocities' testifying against the war in court.
You've said that Kerry would "do anything to be elected President". Explain and prove this. Would he kill someone?
You called Kerry a "coward who runs home after self comending himself for the Purple Hearts so he can be discharged and go home and lead the Anti-War protests". How did he commend himself for a Purple Heart? By getting wounded? Do you know what a purple heart is?
You claim that Kerry thinks of terrorists as "a nuisance, right?". If you'd bother to listen to him, I'm sure he's never claimed that they were a "nuisance".
You call it fact, sounds good.
I know it's your opinion, regardless of your 'facts'.
Also, not to nitpick, but maybe spend an extra 2 seconds on your grammar. You've got some double negatives and mispoken sentences that make it difficult to understand what you're saying. [/b][/quote]
Thanks for the reply, i still have to learn.
What i mean with the atrocities is that Kerry stood before Congress and stated what was happened in Vietnam and the crimes going on, we all know that right?
Thats fact.
He also said that he himself was involved in the crimes, which makes it hard for me to understand why he was confessing to Congress, because if these crimes are indeed true and if he was along in them, then what makes him any better then the others.
You've said that Kerry would "do anything to be elected President". Explain and prove this. Would he kill someone?
Kerry mentioned Dick Cheney's daughter's sexuality in the last debete and if you've been following the election and polls Kerry is suffering because of it. Why does he mention this? He's trying to get the votes from the gay community by never openly saying that he is against homosexuality, but by also never saying he is for it he is trying to get support from those against it. And the fact that he stated the remark about Cheney's daughter shows in a way the he doesn't have many moral ethics.
I say this because regardless of who you are up against and what the question was, he is running for President, and to me a candidate shouldn't ever mention in person the sexuality of another person. Who's to say he wouldn't do it again in the future. Also we all know how the media is saying he flip flops back and forth between his decisons and has lied (some are facts others probably not) before, to me shows that he will do anything to get support from the people of America to become President.
Did he ever give us his real plan for America? Probably but he mentions "i have a plan" more then actually saying what his plan is. I haven't followed the election much, but enough to try and figure out what each candidate stands for. Bush openly confesses that he is a Christian man and adheres to those Principles. Kerry says he Catholic and i won't argue with that, but Catholics, (the Pope) are against homosexuality openly and don't want any part of it, yet Kerry saying he is Catholic can't make up his mind. He will do and say anything to get the votes from the people, just to become President.
Most of that was opinion.
Statements have been realeased that Kerry wrote the report on the incident that lead him to recieve the Purple Heart. Who's to say he never stetched the truth a little. And considering the fact that he went home and joined the Anti-war protest, lets me believe that he wanted out of Vietnam, so why wouldn't he file those reports knowing he would get discharged with another Purple Heart.
And a purple heart is awarded to people who have been wounded in combat.
I said before the comment about the terrorists are a nuisance was taken from a source that streched the truth a little, and it just popped into my mind.
Many things which i say about Kerry is my own opinion, mainly because i believe that he shouldn't be the one with his finger on America's Nuclear Trigger. But everything can be backed up.....to a point....fact.....from a source whether proven or not.
I love to debate with you, glad you came back and asked questions.
