Did a plane really hit the Pentagon?

[Displaced Flames fan]

Originally posted by dangler22@Nov 11 2004, 08:58 PM
You are a grown man aren't you? Do your parents still wipe your arse for you? I doubt it- so I am sure you are perfectly capable of looking up all that stuff yourself. Some guys have all the time in the world to post links and chat it up all day. I am a full time student with a part time job and a 20 page paper due next week. For the record I do not believe in the sasquatch. From the stuff that I have read there is a pretty good case that there was no moon landing. Not everyone has to believe it. That is why it is called a conspiracy theory. It is one of the better ones out there though.

Wow. Nice response there Mr. Maturity. You said you don't believe something, I asked you why. I'm supposed to find out why you don't believe something by using the internet?

How should I google that? Why Dangler22 doesn't believe man has been to the moon? How many google matches should I expect?

[Displaced Flames fan]

Originally posted by RougeUnderoos+Nov 11 2004, 09:11 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (RougeUnderoos @ Nov 11 2004, 09:11 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>

There are also many documentaries and books on the existence of Sasquatch in the Pacific Northwest. I find them very interesting. Doesn't mean I believe it....and if you asked me why I don't believe it I would give you specific reasons which you have failed to do.

I've seen cases made for your position and have seen nothing that would sway me. So again, what specific reasons do you have for believing no man has ever set foot on the moon?

I believe this is what you may be looking for.

http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html [/b][/quote]
Hmmm. Didn't see anything there that would tell me why Dangler22 doesn't believe it. Was there a special Dangler22 section that I missed?

[RougeUnderoos]

LOL no, I just cut to the chase. I think that's where everyone should end up with this whole "moon landing is a hoax" business.

[Displaced Flames fan]

Originally posted by RougeUnderoos@Nov 11 2004, 09:14 PM
LOL no, I just cut to the chase. I think that's where everyone should end up with this whole "moon landing is a hoax" business.

No problem, and knew that's what you were doing. Just trying to get the guy to understand what the hell I was looking for in the first place. Apparently when he states an opinion you have to use the internet to find out why he has that opinion.....he's unique in that regard. There are plenty of people here who are more than happy to give me their opinion and the reasons they have it!

[Cowboy]

Originally posted by dangler22@Nov 11 2004, 02:58 PM
You are a grown man aren't you? Do your parents still wipe your arse for you? I doubt it- so I am sure you are perfectly capable of looking up all that stuff yourself. Some guys have all the time in the world to post links and chat it up all day. I am a full time student with a part time job and a 20 page paper due next week. For the record I do not believe in the sasquatch. From the stuff that I have read there is a pretty good case that there was no moon landing. Not everyone has to believe it. That is why it is called a conspiracy theory. It is one of the better ones out there though.

I have to say it!

You don't write very good position papers do you.


I can see it now...In conlusion, if you look up this material on the interenet you will understand exactly what I am thinking. My points in this paper represent the sources I have used off the internet. I don't really back up my oppinion I just simply show that my oppinion exists.

[Tailspin]

if the plane didnt hit the pentagon, what happened to it and all the people that were on it...

[longsuffering]

Originally posted by Displaced Flames fan@Nov 11 2004, 01:51 PM
There are also many documentaries and books on the existence of Sasquatch in the Pacific Northwest. I find them very interesting. Doesn't mean I believe it....and if you asked me why I don't believe it I would give you specific reasons which you have failed to do.

Now you've got a problem with Sasquatches!!??

:innocent:

[Displaced Flames fan]

Originally posted by longsuffering@Nov 11 2004, 10:50 PM

Now you've got a problem with Sasquatches!!??

:innocent:

Is that an olive branch? I think that's an olive branch!

[Agamemnon]

Originally posted by Tailspin@Nov 11 2004, 10:06 PM
if the plane didnt hit the pentagon, what happened to it and all the people that were on it...

Well... if you've seen the video this revolves around, a missile or smaller aircraft is supposed to have hit the Pentagon. No one is suggesting the hole isn't there (or wasn't, I got to tour that section of the Pentagon in 2003, obviously completely rebuilt by now).

[dangler22]

Originally posted by Cowboy+Nov 11 2004, 09:40 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Cowboy @ Nov 11 2004, 09:40 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-dangler22@Nov 11 2004, 02:58 PM
You are a grown man aren't you? Do your parents still wipe your arse for you? I doubt it- so I am sure you are perfectly capable of looking up all that stuff yourself. Some guys have all the time in the world to post links and chat it up all day. I am a full time student with a part time job and a 20 page paper due next week. For the record I do not believe in the sasquatch. From the stuff that I have read there is a pretty good case that there was no moon landing. Not everyone has to believe it. That is why it is called a conspiracy theory. It is one of the better ones out there though.

I have to say it!

You don't write very good position papers do you.


I can see it now...In conlusion, if you look up this material on the interenet you will understand exactly what I am thinking. My points in this paper represent the sources I have used off the internet. I don't really back up my oppinion I just simply show that my oppinion exists. [/b][/quote]
I write very good papers if you must know. If I were getting graded on the crap I post on the net I would probably get poor marks. If I took as much time on my message board posts as my papers I wouldn't have a life outside my computer, job and school. Do I really need to just repeat what a couple documentaries had to say?
My biggest issue is probably the fact that I believe those astronauts would have died passing through the Van Allen radiation belt. But the flag flapping, no visible stars and the shadows cast by the astronauts are weird too.

[Daradon]

Originally posted by Agamemnon+Nov 11 2004, 05:10 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Agamemnon @ Nov 11 2004, 05:10 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Tailspin@Nov 11 2004, 10:06 PM
if the plane didnt hit the pentagon, what happened to it and all the people that were on it...

Well... if you've seen the video this revolves around, a missile or smaller aircraft is supposed to have hit the Pentagon. No one is suggesting the hole isn't there (or wasn't, I got to tour that section of the Pentagon in 2003, obviously completely rebuilt by now). [/b][/quote]
But what he is saying, and it is the biggest blow to this conspiracy theory, is that if flight whatever didn't hit the pentagon, what happened to that plane and all the people aboard? Did the government kill them? I can't imagine they would be able to successfully shut up that many people without just killing them.

[Daradon]

Originally posted by dangler22+Nov 11 2004, 05:16 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (dangler22 @ Nov 11 2004, 05:16 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>

I have to say it!

You don't write very good position papers do you.


I can see it now...In conlusion, if you look up this material on the interenet you will understand exactly what I am thinking. My points in this paper represent the sources I have used off the internet. I don't really back up my oppinion I just simply show that my oppinion exists.

I write very good papers if you must know. If I were getting graded on the crap I post on the net I would probably get poor marks. If I took as much time on my message board posts as my papers I wouldn't have a life outside my computer, job and school. Do I really need to just repeat what a couple documentaries had to say?
My biggest issue is probably the fact that I believe those astronauts would have died passing through the Van Allen radiation belt. But the flag flapping, no visible stars and the shadows cast by the astronauts are weird too. [/b][/quote]
Dude the flag doesn't flap, it's held up by a bar in the top of it. Yes it does stand out, but it was made so it would, it's rigid at the top. I have never seen this 'flapping' you are talking about.

The no shadows and no stars are because the moon is a source of light itself. We all know how the moon reflects the suns light. This: 1. Helps prevent the shadows from occuring, and 2 washes out the sky enough so that you can't see the stars. There's just too much light.

I hope your papers aren't on physics.

[FlamesAllTheWay]

Originally posted by dangler22@Nov 11 2004, 05:16 PM
I write very good papers if you must know. If I were getting graded on the crap I post on the net I would probably get poor marks. If I took as much time on my message board posts as my papers I wouldn't have a life outside my computer, job and school. Do I really need to just repeat what a couple documentaries had to say?
My biggest issue is probably the fact that I believe those astronauts would have died passing through the Van Allen radiation belt. But the flag flapping, no visible stars and the shadows cast by the astronauts are weird too.

Did you even read Rouge's link? It explains every point you just brought up.

Evil Deadly Radiation
http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/f...html#radiation

No Stars
http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html#stars

Waving Flag
http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html#flag

Shadows
http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/f....html#parallel
http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/f...lo.html#shadow

[dangler22]

That radiation explaination sucks. It is just the guys opinion.

[BlackArcher101]

Originally posted by dangler22@Nov 11 2004, 06:33 PM
That radiation explaination sucks. It is just the guys opinion.

The explanation of why and how they would die because of the radiation sucks too.

[photon]

Originally posted by dangler22@Nov 11 2004, 05:33 PM
That radiation explaination sucks. It is just the guys opinion.

Please, PLEASE don't home school your children.

[Weiser Wonder]

Originally posted by photon+Nov 11 2004, 08:37 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (photon @ Nov 11 2004, 08:37 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-dangler22@Nov 11 2004, 05:33 PM
That radiation explaination sucks. It is just the guys opinion.

Please, PLEASE don't home school your children. [/b][/quote]
No one is actually home-schooled. And I firmly believe that.