Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-16-2006, 10:52 PM   #21
STeeLy
Franchise Player
 
STeeLy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Exp:
Default

I don't completely ignore it. But theory is still only a theory until they prove it. Though evidence is strong, neither is proven... however, with advancing technology... we may find an answer.
STeeLy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2006, 12:00 AM   #22
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarchHare
I believe the Vatican has publicly stated that the scientific evidence for both theories is very strong, therefore it would be foolish to ignore it. Certainly that's the case with evolution; I'm not sure about the Big Bang.

Oddly enough, the Catholic Church is probably the most "pro science" of the major Christian denominations. Only religious fundamentalists who take a strictly literal interpretation of the Bible are closed to accepting scientific theories which contradict Genesis. Catholic dogma holds a more metaphorical view of the Bible, or at least the creation story.
That is true.

The anti-science/evolution people mostly come from various protestant sects (Calvinists, Baptists, Puritans, etc...).

I went to Catholic school and they never told us to disregard science. In fact, we learned all about evolution and the such.
FlamesAddiction is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2006, 12:09 AM   #23
STeeLy
Franchise Player
 
STeeLy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction
That is true.

The anti-science/evolution people mostly come from various protestant sects (Calvinists, Baptists, Puritans, etc...).

I went to Catholic school and they never told us to disregard science. In fact, we learned all about evolution and the such.
Needless to say, I am in a Catholic school right now, but I missed out on grades 1 - 4 Science (immigrant... sry for "polluting your country" as some people call it) I have never learned much about the evolution theory... however... how that I'm taking grade 12 physics... they do teach some stuff about the history of physics. So I must say that unlike many other religions... Catholicism is pretty open.
STeeLy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2006, 12:27 AM   #24
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by STeeLy
Needless to say, I am in a Catholic school right now, but I missed out on grades 1 - 4 Science (immigrant... sry for "polluting your country" as some people call it) I have never learned much about the evolution theory... however... how that I'm taking grade 12 physics... they do teach some stuff about the history of physics. So I must say that unlike many other religions... Catholicism is pretty open.
It is probably up to the teacher. I did go to public school for grades 11 and 12, and they didn't teach us about evolution in great detail either. Most of what I learned regarding evolution was in university.

The Catholic church does have things it needs to atone for, but I do think it gets a bad rap. Anti-Catholicism is probably one of the oldest and the most tolerated form of biggotry in the English speaking world. Again, I'm not saying it is not without it's faults, but no culture or religon is, yet we protect most from the kind of judgement the Catholic church gets. At the very least, we save others from open displays of hate.

For the record, I am not a practicing Catholic any more, so I have nothing invested in protecting the church.

BTW, where did you immigrate from. You don't have to say if you're not comfortable with it, I'm just curious. My family are immigrants too. I was the 1st born in Canada.

Last edited by FlamesAddiction; 02-17-2006 at 12:36 AM.
FlamesAddiction is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2006, 12:35 AM   #25
STeeLy
Franchise Player
 
STeeLy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction
BTW, where did you immigrate from. You don't have to say if you're not comfortable with it, I'm just curious. My family are immigrants too. I was the 1st born in Canada.
Hong Kong is where I am from.

I am actually very comfortable saying it because I get different yet interesting reactions from different people... its... kinda weird.
STeeLy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2006, 01:00 AM   #26
Superfraggle
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by STeeLy
I don't completely ignore it. But theory is still only a theory until they prove it. Though evidence is strong, neither is proven... however, with advancing technology... we may find an answer.
I wish...unfortunately, nothing can truly be proven. The problem is that all of our "facts" are based on observation. For example, say you see 1,000,000,000 ravens...and they're all black. That would likely lead you to say that ravens are black...until you find a white one. It is reasonable to say that ravens are black...it is reasonable to believe that all ravens are black. It can't be proven, though, unless you could take a census of every single raven in the universe.

Or how about gravity? Does gravity exist? Does it work the way they say it does? It would certainly appear so. But how did they come to those conclusions? They took the phenomenon of things always falling to the ground, made a lot of experiments and observations, and came up with a theory that fits. Unfortunately, that theory is entirely based upon observations, like all theories, and will be disproven as soon as an apple is found that does not fall to the ground. Is there a wackload of evidence that shows gravity exists? yes. Do I believe in gravity? yes. Is it really proven? No. It can't be. All we know is that everything we've observed so far seems to fit the theory.

Theories they are, and theories they shall remain...the only question is how much evidence we can find with which to support them, and how much evidence it will take for people to believe in them.
Superfraggle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2006, 01:11 AM   #27
STeeLy
Franchise Player
 
STeeLy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Superfraggle
Theories they are, and theories they shall remain...the only question is how much evidence we can find with which to support them, and how much evidence it will take for people to believe in them.
So, what you're saying is that Theory with an adequate amount of evidence is true until proven untrue.

Also, back to that gravity thing... my chem teacher believes that Gravity doesn't exist... it is hard to prove that it exists... but also hard to prove it doesn't.
STeeLy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2006, 01:20 AM   #28
Superfraggle
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by STeeLy
So, what you're saying is that Theory with an adequate amount of evidence is true until proven untrue.

Also, back to that gravity thing... my chem teacher believes that Gravity doesn't exist... it is hard to prove that it exists... but also hard to prove it doesn't.
what I'm saying is that's the best we can do. The problem with absolute proof one way or the other is that you can't get it. You can choose to believe whatever you like, and noone can really prove you wrong. All we have is different levels of probability to help guide our thinking.
Superfraggle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2006, 01:22 AM   #29
STeeLy
Franchise Player
 
STeeLy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Superfraggle
what I'm saying is that's the best we can do. The problem with absolute proof one way or the other is that you can't get it. You can choose to believe whatever you like, and noone can really prove you wrong. All we have is different levels of probability to help guide our thinking.
Agreed
STeeLy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2006, 10:01 AM   #30
Flames89
First Line Centre
 
Flames89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Toronto, ON
Exp:
Default

For a fascinating read about human society evolution, I would suggest to all:

Guns, Germs, & Steel
Flames89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2006, 10:49 AM   #31
Calgary Flames
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Calgary Flames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2006, 07:17 PM   #32
Hack&Lube
Atomic Nerd
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgary Flames
Hmm, all hockey players are technically walking on water.
Hack&Lube is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:05 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy