Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-31-2006, 01:51 PM   #21
RougeUnderoos
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Clinching Party
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arsenal
So if the earth able to handle that much CO2 from its human inhabitants (doesn't include animals by the way), wouldn't it be suffice to say that it could handle the extra with out the us reaching the "point of no return" ?
I don't that suffices at all. That sounds like "well, the earth can handle a little, so it obviously can handle waaaaay more".


Electricity generation, transportation, heavy industry... those are the things that are usually listed as major polluters. Human exhaling of CO2 has got to be really far down any list of major contributors to greenhouse gases. I'm no science guy, but I've read a few things and I've never seen it. Maybe it is though, I don't know. I doubt it.

Reduce emissions sure, I am all for it. But there are better ways of doing it.

If you are talking about Kyoto then I agree. It doesn't look like it'll do much of anything.

Last edited by RougeUnderoos; 01-31-2006 at 01:58 PM.
RougeUnderoos is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:01 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy