[Game Takes] Flames 4 Ducks 1

[Paulie Walnuts]

Originally Posted by Bingo

So you thought the stick breaking over someone from Pachal shouldn't have been a penalty?

It's a play that happens 100 times a game. If the stick doesn't break no call.

[GioforPM]

Originally Posted by Bingo

So you thought the stick breaking over someone from Pachal shouldn't have been a penalty?

What I saw wasn't much of a cross check. It was like they collided and Pachal's stick happened to break.

[Wastedyouth]

Originally Posted by GioforPM

What I saw wasn't much of a cross check. It was like they collided and Pachal's stick happened to break.

Lol, that was as clear of a cross check as you could have.

[GioforPM]

Originally Posted by Wastedyouth

Lol, that was as clear of a cross check as you could have.

Well, no, it wasn't. This is a cross check.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQh2ImH2Wng

Pachal just kind of ran into the Duck and his stick broke.

[Bingo]

Originally Posted by Paulie Walnuts

It's a play that happens 100 times a game. If the stick doesn't break no call.

It did break.
It was a crosscheck.

The chances over overlooking one of the 100 times a game diminishes greatly with a broken stick.

It was still a cross check regardless of how many times a game it happens.

[dino7c]

Flames were absolutely dominating the game and has less powerplays...the chant wasnt about one call. Also, they got one shortly after the Flames and building got on them.

Refs did in fact suck. High sticking a guy and then throwing his stick 30 feet isnt a penalty now?

[Badgers Nose]

Refs always suck

[D as in David]

Originally Posted by GioforPM

What I saw wasn't much of a cross check. It was like they collided and Pachal's stick happened to break.

I think it was Sarich who agreed with this take last night.