Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-26-2024, 11:40 AM   #21
OutOfTheCube
Franchise Player
 
OutOfTheCube's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

That's a pretty big 'if' on Wolf there. One could also say 'if' he struggles, the Flames have bottom-5 goaltending in the league. I don't think even the most optimistic fan would put Calgary at 5th right now...
OutOfTheCube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2024, 11:59 AM   #22
TrentCrimmIndependent
Franchise Player
 
TrentCrimmIndependent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Richmond upon Thames, London
Exp:
Default

Love seeing pundits faith in Wolf.

It makes me reflect on my own belief in the kid and how taking too much stock in his limited action so far might be hasty/premature.

If they see elite tools still, maybe this situation needs a little more patience from us.
TrentCrimmIndependent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2024, 12:04 PM   #23
TrentCrimmIndependent
Franchise Player
 
TrentCrimmIndependent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Richmond upon Thames, London
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 442scotty View Post
Definitely not sold on Wolf like some people are. It’s all well and good that’s he’s been great in the AHL but NHL snipers are going to eat him for breakfast.
Or he adjusts like he has at every level of hockey.

Thinking he's already plateaued as far as NHL play seems foolish.

The better question is how much room or growth is there in the kid at this level.
TrentCrimmIndependent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2024, 12:05 PM   #24
DoubleK
Franchise Player
 
DoubleK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Seattle, WA/Scottsdale, AZ
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OutOfTheCube View Post
That's a pretty big 'if' on Wolf there. One could also say 'if' he struggles, the Flames have bottom-5 goaltending in the league. I don't think even the most optimistic fan would put Calgary at 5th right now...
We will have to wait and see how Wolf fares this season. He is going to get absolutely shelled every night out.
__________________
It's only game. Why you heff to be mad?
DoubleK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2024, 12:08 PM   #25
blankall
Ate 100 Treadmills
 
blankall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Personally, I hope that Wolf doesn't "run with it" right away, as early as next year. With all the tearing down the Flames have done, not getting a top draft pick would be disappointing. I'd prefer Wolf slowly becoming a legit starter over the next 1-2 years.
blankall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2024, 12:32 PM   #26
Strange Brew
Franchise Player
 
Strange Brew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Not sure 20th, 3rd and 5th average out to 5th but I’ll take it I guess. 20th for current rankings seems kind of generous but the cap situation is just about perfect and should be better than 5th.
Strange Brew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2024, 12:39 PM   #27
Goriders
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 442scotty View Post
Definitely not sold on Wolf like some people are. It’s all well and good that’s he’s been great in the AHL but NHL snipers are going to eat him for breakfast.
Top left corner all day.
Goriders is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Goriders For This Useful Post:
Old 07-26-2024, 12:41 PM   #28
Goriders
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blankall View Post
Personally, I hope that Wolf doesn't "run with it" right away, as early as next year. With all the tearing down the Flames have done, not getting a top draft pick would be disappointing. I'd prefer Wolf slowly becoming a legit starter over the next 1-2 years.
Have you looked at the defence in front of him?

I’m more worried about him getting hung out to dry.
Goriders is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2024, 12:47 PM   #29
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goriders View Post
Have you looked at the defence in front of him?

I’m more worried about him getting hung out to dry.
If Wolf somehow steals games next year then the Flames will have their Saros. Markstrom was going to get sewered in front of that D
Bonded is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2024, 12:51 PM   #30
rogermexico
Powerplay Quarterback
 
rogermexico's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Okotoks
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Brew View Post
Not sure 20th, 3rd and 5th average out to 5th but I’ll take it I guess. 20th for current rankings seems kind of generous but the cap situation is just about perfect and should be better than 5th.
Knowing the Athletic, they probably had Dom Luszczyszyn cook up a proprietary "Adjusted Average Plus" algorithm that includes the combined NHLe scores of the goalies, the altitude of their training facilities, and last night's betting lines.
rogermexico is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2024, 01:04 PM   #31
butterfly
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeluxeMoustache View Post
Barely adequate? He was 13-6-2 and 14-6-5 when the team was trying to compete, and was very much not sheltered. He faced mainly playoff opponents while Marky got the bottom dwellers included in his mix

Note that in 2022-23, when he was 14-6-5, Markstrom was 23-21-12

Last year he was 8-9-2 when the team blew it up, he had a hip injury, and meanwhile the #1 goalie Markstrom was 23-23-2. No real dropoff from starter to backup

Not really sure what more you want from a backup goalie
Record is a poor way to evaluate goaltenders. The Flames scored 4.48 goals/game in 2022-23 Vladar decisions and 2.72 goals/game in the rest of them.

During those three seasons, Vladar had -3.8, -8.4, and -12.5 GSAE. He's 66th out of 76 at GSAE/60 in 2022-23 (minimum 12 games), and 71st out of 71 at GSAE/60 in 2023-24. He's bad.

No reason to spend any more than league minimum on someone like that, unless you're Treliving.
butterfly is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to butterfly For This Useful Post:
Old 07-26-2024, 01:07 PM   #32
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Brew View Post
Not sure 20th, 3rd and 5th average out to 5th but I’ll take it I guess.
I would imagine they have some kind of points system that they rate each team on, and then publish the ranking instead of the raw point score.

Chances are very good that most teams bunch up in the middle on the raw score, so there won't be that much difference between 10th and 20th. The top 5 and bottom 5 will be much further from the average. If you have two scores in the top 5, that will be enough to put you pretty high overall unless your third score is bottom of the barrel.

Remember, nobody is going to be rated high on all three measures. Teams with top goalies usually have big cap hits for those goalies, and they're usually getting results from those goalies, which hurts their prospect depth.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jay Random For This Useful Post:
Old 07-26-2024, 01:08 PM   #33
Lewis_D
Scoring Winger
 
Lewis_D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Location: Victoria, BC
Exp:
Default

Not the ranking I would have expected even by their own ranking system. But that's encouraging to see!
Lewis_D is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Lewis_D For This Useful Post:
Old 07-26-2024, 10:31 PM   #34
Strange Brew
Franchise Player
 
Strange Brew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Random View Post
I would imagine they have some kind of points system that they rate each team on, and then publish the ranking instead of the raw point score.

Chances are very good that most teams bunch up in the middle on the raw score, so there won't be that much difference between 10th and 20th. The top 5 and bottom 5 will be much further from the average. If you have two scores in the top 5, that will be enough to put you pretty high overall unless your third score is bottom of the barrel.

Remember, nobody is going to be rated high on all three measures. Teams with top goalies usually have big cap hits for those goalies, and they're usually getting results from those goalies, which hurts their prospect depth.
You made this entire rationalization up. No idea what their process was or that scores were bunched up in the category on which Flames did poorly.

Excited about Wolf but the Flames don’t have the 5th best goaltending situation in the league. Not yet at least.
Strange Brew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2024, 10:36 PM   #35
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

If we’re 5th it’s definitely skewed wit the combined cap hit.
ForeverFlameFan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2024, 12:07 AM   #36
Snuffleupagus
Franchise Player
 
Snuffleupagus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yamer View Post
Wolf has excelled at every level and is just starting to get reps in the most difficult league in the world. I think it's ok not to be sold on him just yet, but I hope Flames fans still have a lot of excitement about this player.

Everything considered, Wolf is arguably the most accomplished goaltending prospect this any franchise has ever had.
Maybe someone with a lot of time on their hands can find one but I think one would be hard pressed to find a prospect goalie with more accomplishments before he became an NHL starter.
Snuffleupagus is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2024, 12:15 AM   #37
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Brew View Post
You made this entire rationalization up.
Well, apparently you think they just pulled the numbers out of their arses, because that's the only other alternative.

Quote:
No idea what their process was or that scores were bunched up in the category on which Flames did poorly.
Look at the league standings. They are always bunched up in the middle. Any measure of current goaltending would be bunched up in the middle as well.

Quote:
Excited about Wolf but the Flames don’t have the 5th best goaltending situation in the league. Not yet at least.
No duh. That's why they ranked 20th for the present and 3rd for the future.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2024, 12:54 AM   #38
butterfly
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Just thought it was interesting. And it doesn't sum to zero; the mean GSAE is 3.7, which is average goaltending for a full season.

butterfly is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to butterfly For This Useful Post:
Old 07-27-2024, 01:26 AM   #39
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

First-place Winnipeg, +46; 5th-place Rangers, +23. Difference: 23.
28th-place Chicago, –17; 32nd-place Ottawa, –34. Difference: 17.
10th-place Islanders, +9; 20th-place Seattle, –1. Difference: 10.

OK, Strange Brew, explain to me again how these numbers don't bunch up in the middle.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2024, 01:33 AM   #40
butterfly
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: California
Exp:
Default

One thing hit me as I was putting that together - GSAE tries to normalize for shot quality, but not shot volume. Therefore goalies on teams that are good at shot suppression have a much weaker chance to stand out on this metric.

I should have added in shot volume as a variable but even that is flawed reasoning as it assumes all marginal shots allowed or suppressed are of equal quality. This where NHL Edge could have given us the data so we could have fun making cool stuff with it but they chose to give us useless things like a skater's maximum speed.
butterfly is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to butterfly For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:09 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy