Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-07-2023, 03:54 PM   #21
Reggie Dunlop
All I can get
 
Reggie Dunlop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

They signed Oesterle on the second day of Free Agency to a one-way contract. I guess we'll see how that commitment works out.
Reggie Dunlop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2023, 03:56 PM   #22
Sandman
Franchise Player
 
Sandman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
Oesterle actually had been good until last night...I think there is some bias against him because he isn't really young or a Flames pick
Last night wasn't his best though I will admit

If I'm Conroy I'm watching waivers like a hawk though
I agree, I thought he’s been nice and steady, and moving the puck well most of the time. Nothing spectacular at all.
Sandman is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Sandman For This Useful Post:
Old 10-07-2023, 04:06 PM   #23
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reggie Dunlop View Post
They signed Oesterle on the second day of Free Agency to a one-way contract. I guess we'll see how that commitment works out.
he can still be sent down...1 way doesn't matter unless you a chipping in for his salary
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2023, 04:10 PM   #24
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Oesterle had a tough game last night for sure, but I thought he had a really good camp up to that point. Solovyov has been a big surprise, and has inserted himself into the mix, which is awesome. Even though he probably starts the year in the A, he is going to play some games.

The guy I am having trouble with is Schwindt, just not seeing anything there.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Old 10-07-2023, 04:38 PM   #25
Redrum
First Line Centre
 
Redrum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Having that Shwindt spot might be a good chance to insert some toughness. Though they don't really have anyone close to NHL caliber, unless you use Gilbert as a 7th D.
Redrum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2023, 04:58 PM   #26
Flames1217
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
Wtf were you watching last night?
Didn't catch the game last night.
Flames1217 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2023, 05:35 PM   #27
browna
Franchise Player
 
browna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Puckpedia also outlines a way for the Flames to maximize LTIR:

https://twitter.com/user/status/1710671454621372709
This is a tough one. For the same internal/league/privacy reasons the Flames didn’t put OK on LTIR last year, why would they do that this year when his condition is more or less the same?
browna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2023, 05:41 PM   #28
D as in David
Franchise Player
 
D as in David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by browna View Post
This is a tough one. For the same internal/league/privacy reasons the Flames didn’t put OK on LTIR last year, why would they do that this year when his condition is more or less the same?
Because they were under the cap, therefore, it made no sense to put him on LTIR as it would have prevented the Flames from accumulating cap space as the year went on. I can't recall whether they did end up putting him on LTIR at the trade deadline, though.
D as in David is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2023, 05:47 PM   #29
flambers
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by D as in David View Post
Because they were under the cap, therefore, it made no sense to put him on LTIR as it would have prevented the Flames from accumulating cap space as the year went on. I can't recall whether they did end up putting him on LTIR at the trade deadline, though.
Nope, Flames were under the cap for the full season

LTIR was not required,

However with the injuries I can definitely see the Flames using LTIR this year
flambers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2023, 05:47 PM   #30
Freeway
Franchise Player
 
Freeway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Kylington was eligible for LTI, but they just never needed the space.
__________________
PHWA Member // Managing Editor @ FlamesNation // Author of "On The Clock: Behind The Scenes with the Calgary Flames at the NHL Draft" // Twitter

"Does a great job covering the Flames" - Elliotte Friedman
Freeway is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2023, 06:07 PM   #31
browna
Franchise Player
 
browna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Well I had also heard that not going on LTIR also meant that some of the benefits and league programs would be available uninterrupted…and that going in LTIR meant that his issues for being on LTIR and updates while on IRwould have the potential to be more publicly disclosed at the time or after. So, out of respect for those things, the Flames didn’t use LTIR.

Not sure if that’s true or not, just what I heard from a trusted source over the summer.
browna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2023, 06:22 PM   #32
Reggie Dunlop
All I can get
 
Reggie Dunlop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
he can still be sent down...1 way doesn't matter unless you a chipping in for his salary
My point I so that the team identified and targeted him early in free agency. He’s going to get more runway than a typical waiver pickup.
Reggie Dunlop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2023, 06:43 PM   #33
transplant99
Fearmongerer
 
transplant99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
Exp:
Default

transplant99 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to transplant99 For This Useful Post:
Old 10-07-2023, 06:50 PM   #34
nieuwy-89
First Line Centre
 
nieuwy-89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Iggy-ville
Exp:
Default

So if I have this right, the roster changes from the end of last season are:

Toffoli, Lucic, Lewis, Stone out
Coronato, Sharangovich, Hunt/Schwindt, Oesterle in

I guess a bit younger & faster but essentially the same team that underachieved last season, without its top scorer.

Was hoping for more change, as last year was incredibly bad.
nieuwy-89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2023, 06:55 PM   #35
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

93 points is incredibly bad?

The hope is the mood around the team and the play style (along with more ice time for good players) will pick up a few more wins. Not to mention the goaltending that is probably most important.

No Pelletier and Kylington isn't ideal for sure
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2023, 07:51 PM   #36
gvitaly
Franchise Player
 
gvitaly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
93 points is incredibly bad?

The hope is the mood around the team and the play style (along with more ice time for good players) will pick up a few more wins. Not to mention the goaltending that is probably most important.

No Pelletier and Kylington isn't ideal for sure
The points themselves weren't bad. It was how this team was losing:
  • The inability to mount a comeback in the 3rd.
  • Letting in back breaking goals despite having the puck for most of the game.
  • The amount of low danger shots the team fired.
  • The lackluster PP
  • The terrible OT record
  • The effort level and corresponding losses against bottom feeders like Chicago
  • The lack of winning streaks to speak of

The boring hockey combined with the lack of success really frustrated many fans, and the players themselves.
gvitaly is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to gvitaly For This Useful Post:
Old 10-07-2023, 08:02 PM   #37
robertsfanatic
Powerplay Quarterback
 
robertsfanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Toronto, ON
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gvitaly View Post
The points themselves weren't bad. It was how this team was losing:
  • The inability to mount a comeback in the 3rd.
  • Letting in back breaking goals despite having the puck for most of the game.
  • The amount of low danger shots the team fired.
  • The lackluster PP
  • The terrible OT record
  • The effort level and corresponding losses against bottom feeders like Chicago
  • The lack of winning streaks to speak of

The boring hockey combined with the lack of success really frustrated many fans, and the players themselves.
hopefully the new coach can help with some of these....but goaltending has to be better
__________________
*Disclaimer: I am a "glass half full" Flames fan.
robertsfanatic is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to robertsfanatic For This Useful Post:
Old 10-08-2023, 12:37 AM   #38
calculoso
Franchise Player
 
calculoso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nieuwy-89 View Post
So if I have this right, the roster changes from the end of last season are:

Toffoli, Lucic, Lewis, Stone out
Coronato, Sharangovich, Hunt/Schwindt, Oesterle in

I guess a bit younger & faster but essentially the same team that underachieved last season, without its top scorer.

Was hoping for more change, as last year was incredibly bad.
Missed the biggest change:
Out: Sutter
calculoso is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to calculoso For This Useful Post:
Old 10-08-2023, 12:40 AM   #39
nieuwy-89
First Line Centre
 
nieuwy-89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Iggy-ville
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calculoso View Post
Missed the biggest change:
Out: Sutter
I agree there’s a new culture and feeling around the team. But Sutter was an elite cup-winning coach. Huska is unproven.

At the end of the day it’s on the players to perform. Agree that goaltending is a huge factor for the Flames to have a chance.
nieuwy-89 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to nieuwy-89 For This Useful Post:
Old 10-08-2023, 01:35 AM   #40
combustiblefuel
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Nanaimo
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Freeway View Post
Kylington was eligible for LTI, but they just never needed the space.
I sympathize for Kylington and his issues as I have been continuing to deal with mental health issues my whole life. (Asbergers) but, It's time to move on and cut him out if he can't be ready to play by the middle or near the end of November if I'm the Flames. It's becoming very obvious this just isn't his life's path if he took a season and a half off and can't get his #### together.

I'm pulling for him but if within that time line he can't organize himself it's better for him and the organization to part ways. Maybe pro hockey isn't in the cards for him and he ends up running a multi billion company or a Nation staple mom and pop shop.
combustiblefuel is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:51 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy