Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-24-2023, 03:13 PM   #21
topfiverecords
Franchise Player
 
topfiverecords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Park Hyatt Tokyo
Exp:
Default

Chychrun replacement. As in the next D that will ask for a trade out of Arizona.
topfiverecords is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2023, 03:13 PM   #22
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

My guess is LA would be unable to meet his contract demands for 2024 and beyond, thus selling him now and utilizing Clarke or another prospect on the bottom pairing. Not much cap savings, but at some point Clarke will be their future.
ForeverFlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2023, 03:15 PM   #23
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonded View Post
I prefer to think they wanted to make sure Montreal couldn't reacquire it's second for a PLD offersheet lol
Oh, now that's an interesting idea.

Often, when a team has multiple draft picks in a round, the trade conditions will indicate the trade is the highest or lowest draft pick the team owns (like the Monahan conditions). Before this deal, Arizona held their own pick plus Florida's, Washington's, and Montreal's, so it is interesting to see that it's specifically Montreal's pick that was traded.

This year, any offer sheet with an AAV between $6,435,187 and $10,725,314 will require a 2024 second rounder as compensation. This does effectively take Montreal out of the offer sheet game for Dubois.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
Old 06-24-2023, 03:20 PM   #24
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Bernstein saying the Kings are clearing space for a bigger. Perhaps some Flames players?
__________________
"Everybody's so desperate to look smart that nobody is having fun anymore" -Jackie Redmond
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2023, 03:22 PM   #25
topfiverecords
Franchise Player
 
topfiverecords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Park Hyatt Tokyo
Exp:
Default

Flames fans want Konecny so it’s likely he goes to LA instead.
topfiverecords is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2023, 03:23 PM   #26
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
Bernstein saying the Kings are clearing space for a bigger. Perhaps some Flames players?
PLD is the smoke
Bonded is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2023, 03:26 PM   #27
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonded View Post
I prefer to think they wanted to make sure Montreal couldn't reacquire it's second for a PLD offersheet lol
I think you’re absolutely right about this.
ForeverFlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ForeverFlameFan For This Useful Post:
Old 06-24-2023, 03:29 PM   #28
Strange Brew
Franchise Player
 
Strange Brew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

I don’t get, only a $1.7 million cap hit for a promising younger player. Maybe Kings planning to make moves and don’t think they can extend him but geez, his cap hit this year is nothing. For context, his AAV would be seventh highest on Flames back end.
Strange Brew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2023, 03:32 PM   #29
MrMike
Franchise Player
 
MrMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Van Island
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonded View Post
I prefer to think they wanted to make sure Montreal couldn't reacquire it's second for a PLD offersheet lol
That is actually clever as hell!
MrMike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2023, 03:50 PM   #30
Macho0978
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Great deal for Arizona. Kings will depend on who the get but seems a bit strange Durzi out was best move as their d is weak
Macho0978 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2023, 04:00 PM   #31
topfiverecords
Franchise Player
 
topfiverecords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Park Hyatt Tokyo
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonded View Post
I prefer to think they wanted to make sure Montreal couldn't reacquire it's second for a PLD offersheet lol
Plot twist: LA is getting Montreal’s 2nd to give it back to them for profit.
topfiverecords is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2023, 06:41 PM   #32
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by getbak View Post
Oh, now that's an interesting idea.

Often, when a team has multiple draft picks in a round, the trade conditions will indicate the trade is the highest or lowest draft pick the team owns (like the Monahan conditions). Before this deal, Arizona held their own pick plus Florida's, Washington's, and Montreal's, so it is interesting to see that it's specifically Montreal's pick that was traded.

This year, any offer sheet with an AAV between $6,435,187 and $10,725,314 will require a 2024 second rounder as compensation. This does effectively take Montreal out of the offer sheet game for Dubois.
Chicago had Toronto’s second round pick and Toronto needed it so they could at least threaten an offer sheet for Phil Kessel, forcing Boston to trade him to them.

Chicago traded that pick for an earlier pick, being Calgary’s, and picked Brandon Saab.
The Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2023, 06:59 PM   #33
Winsor_Pilates
Franchise Player
 
Winsor_Pilates's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Van City - Main St.
Exp:
Default

I thought Durzi was a main piece in LA; very surprising and very cheap.
Good moves Yotes.
Winsor_Pilates is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2023, 09:30 AM   #34
keenan87
Franchise Player
 
keenan87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Flames Town
Exp:
Default

Good move by Arizona. Feel bad for Durzi though.
keenan87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:13 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy