Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-28-2023, 11:33 AM   #21
Lubicon
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doctorfever View Post
Weird. I thought this was already the law. I always slow down to 60. I think lots of people do.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG View Post
Didn’t they change it to 60 in all lanes a few years ago?

This one I think just adds snow plows that are parked and maintenance vehicles.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Firebot View Post
I didn't realize it was a rule not yet implemented (considering it is in most other provinces and assumed it was here as well). I've always slowed down regardless.
This has always been the problem, there is inconsistency in the laws between provinces and even within Alberta many people did not know what the rules were. I agree it makes sense as Alberta is more aligned (still variances from province to province) so should make it easier. It was dangerous before when people would slow in all lanes and others would not, causing a large speed discrepancy.

Anyhow there are still some significant differences between the provinces, I wish they would all get on board and be the same:

Saskatchewan:
60 km/h all lanes (unless divided highway).

Manitoba:
60 km/h and MUST move over one lane

BC:
70 km/h and MUST move over one lane


https://sgi.sk.ca/pro-driver/-/knowl...ded%20highway.

https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/t...llow%20lights.

https://www.caamanitoba.com/advocacy...ts%20flashing.
Lubicon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2023, 06:15 PM   #22
Faust
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Traffic changes for passing emergency vehicles delayed:

https://okotoksonline.com/articles/t...hicles-delayed
Faust is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Faust For This Useful Post:
Old 02-28-2023, 06:23 PM   #23
Fuzz
Franchise Player
 
Fuzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Faust View Post
Traffic changes for passing emergency vehicles delayed:

https://okotoksonline.com/articles/t...hicles-delayed
Quote:
The reason for the delay was to give time to educate the public about the changes to prevent unneeded tickets.
Or, crazy thought, they could give out warnings until Sept 1st, and tickets the really egregious speeders.

Dumb reason for the delay, since it was this government that introduced it. Not very good at their jobs.
Fuzz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Fuzz For This Useful Post:
Old 02-28-2023, 06:29 PM   #24
WhiteTiger
Franchise Player
 
WhiteTiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz View Post
Or, crazy thought, they could give out warnings until Sept 1st, and tickets the really egregious speeders.

Dumb reason for the delay, since it was this government that introduced it. Not very good at their jobs.
I agree on the warnings, though there has been surprisingly little public education on the changes, to be sure.
WhiteTiger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2023, 06:30 PM   #25
Cecil Terwilliger
That Crazy Guy at the Bus Stop
 
Cecil Terwilliger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Springfield Penitentiary
Exp:
Default

But I posted it on CP. That's all the public education required. Anyone who doesn't check CP deserves to get a ticket.
Cecil Terwilliger is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Cecil Terwilliger For This Useful Post:
Old 02-28-2023, 06:41 PM   #26
Reggie Dunlop
All I can get
 
Reggie Dunlop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Fair enough
__________________
Thank you for your attention to this matter!
Reggie Dunlop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2023, 06:47 PM   #27
Flabbibulin
Franchise Player
 
Flabbibulin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Exp:
Default

In my experience, most drivers are unsure what the actual rule is and typically slow down regardless of which lane they are in. And perhaps its not even because they are unsure of the law and do it because its the common sense decent thing to do.

Last edited by Flabbibulin; 02-28-2023 at 06:50 PM.
Flabbibulin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2023, 07:04 PM   #28
#-3
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Exp:
Default

I think the only reason this makes sense is because people were already doing it, and as many pointed out here already thought it was the law.

The real unsafe thing is the guy slowing down to nearly half the speed limit without obstruction in front of them or beside them. But since you can't fix the danger created by those people you change the law to make everyone else adapt to their recklessness.

I agree this is probably the safest rule, but it's not because of the people 30' away from the accident driving 100 kph, it's the guy in front of him who is slowing down to 50 kph even though the speed limit was 100.
#-3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2023, 07:27 PM   #29
Ashartus
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Several years ago one of the oil companies (I think Encana pre-Ovintiv) sent out a safety bulletin that recommended moving into the closest lane and slowing down to 60, since it was so unpredictable whether people would slow down or not in the other lanes. At least now (or I guess September) there will be some consistency if everyone slows down to 60.
Ashartus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2023, 07:34 PM   #30
GGG
Franchise Player
 
GGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by #-3 View Post
I think the only reason this makes sense is because people were already doing it, and as many pointed out here already thought it was the law.

The real unsafe thing is the guy slowing down to nearly half the speed limit without obstruction in front of them or beside them. But since you can't fix the danger created by those people you change the law to make everyone else adapt to their recklessness.

I agree this is probably the safest rule, but it's not because of the people 30' away from the accident driving 100 kph, it's the guy in front of him who is slowing down to 50 kph even though the speed limit was 100.
No when the adjacent lane slows to 60 the outside lane should not be traveling 120. That much differential speed is not safe. In addition the reason for the 60 km speed limit in one lane is to give more reaction time to the unknown scenario that is occurring. By having the other lane going 120 you have cut off the options for reactions.

All lanes slowing is the only sensible way the law should be written.

t)
RSA 2000 TRAFFIC SAFETY ACT Chapter T-6
time, drive a vehicle on a highway during that period of time at a speed that is greater than the maximum speed limit established or prescribed for that highway for that period of time;
where a minimum speed limit is established or prescribed under this Act for a highway with respect to a period of time, drive a vehicle on a highway during that period of time at a speed that is less than the minimum speed limit established or prescribed for that highway for that period of time;
subject to subsection (4), drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed greater than 60 kilometres per hour, or the maximum speed limit established or prescribed for that highway under
(i) this Act,
(ii) the Government Property Traffic Act (Canada), or
(iii) the National Parks Act (Canada), whichever is lower, if the vehicle
(iv) is travelling on the same side of the highway as a stopped emergency vehicle or tow truck, and
(v) is passing the stopped emergency vehicle or tow truck when its flashing lamps are operating.
(3) Notwithstanding subsection (2)(c), the Registrar or the road authority may issue a permit authorizing a race to be held on a highway subject to any terms or conditions that the Registrar or the road authority considers appropriate.
(4) Subsection (2)(t) does not apply if there are 2 or more traffic lanes for traffic moving in the same direction as the vehicle and there is at least one traffic lane between the driver’s vehicle and the stopped emergency vehicle or tow truck.
RSA 2000 cT-6 s115;2001 c14 s16;2005 c34 s21

The above is the current wording for those interested.

The other issue is that if the police car or tow truck has a tire crossing the white line now both cars have to slow down. It’s crazy that I vividly remember this being changed already but it obviously hasn’t. A wierd Mandela affect.

Last edited by GGG; 02-28-2023 at 07:38 PM.
GGG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2023, 08:29 PM   #31
powderjunkie
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by #-3 View Post
I think the only reason this makes sense is because people were already doing it, and as many pointed out here already thought it was the law.

The real unsafe thing is the guy slowing down to nearly half the speed limit without obstruction in front of them or beside them. But since you can't fix the danger created by those people you change the law to make everyone else adapt to their recklessness.

I agree this is probably the safest rule, but it's not because of the people 30' away from the accident driving 100 kph, it's the guy in front of him who is slowing down to 50 kph even though the speed limit was 100.
powderjunkie is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2023, 07:17 AM   #32
calgarygeologist
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz View Post
Looking forward to the first few times I slow to 60 and some meathead in a lifted pickup comes flying up, honking and flashing high beams.
Don't slow down and get in the way until the fall. The implementation of this has been pushed back six months because they need more time for public awareness.
calgarygeologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2023, 07:45 AM   #33
Fuzz
Franchise Player
 
Fuzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgarygeologist View Post
Don't slow down and get in the way until the fall. The implementation of this has been pushed back six months because they need more time for public awareness.
I'd like to take a moment to welcome you to page 2 of the discussion.
Fuzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2023, 10:24 AM   #34
DoubleF
Franchise Player
 
DoubleF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgarygeologist View Post
Don't slow down and get in the way until the fall. The implementation of this has been pushed back six months because they need more time for public awareness.
Print out some GD signs that say, "Slow to 60 ALL lanes" and then hand out warnings until Sept 1 (unless someone is being insanely moronic). TBH, I think this back tracking is confusing people further.
DoubleF is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DoubleF For This Useful Post:
Old 03-01-2023, 11:18 AM   #35
Robbob
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

If I didn't read this thread, I would have thought today was the first day of the new law. It has been on the books for a while.
Robbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2023, 06:13 PM   #36
Lubicon
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Exp:
Default

So th4e new rules are coning September and unless I am misunderstanding these are different than what was proposed in the spring. The way I read this they are adding all roadside workers to the list of groups a driver must slow down for, but the speed reduction is still only going to apply to the lane immediately adjacent to the workers. However drivers will be encourages to move over to another lane but the way I read the Alberta gov't website, and the news clippings they do not mention needing to slow down in those lanes.

Am I missing something?


https://edmontonjournal.com/news/loc...d%20as%20such.

https://www.alberta.ca/roadside-worker-safety.aspx
Lubicon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2023, 06:17 PM   #37
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Yeah that’s dumb.
PepsiFree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2023, 09:07 PM   #38
Brendone
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Brendone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Exp:
Default

So if the vehicle is pulled over but not completely on the shoulder, that means both lanes in that direction must slow down, or just the lane next to the shoulder? Don’t police typically have part of their car in the lane when they’ve stopped?
Brendone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2023, 09:48 PM   #39
KelVarnsen
Franchise Player
 
KelVarnsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Apartment 5A
Exp:
Default

Everyone knows safety is woke
KelVarnsen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2023, 02:00 AM   #40
btimbit
Franchise Player
 
btimbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: St. George's, Grenada
Exp:
Default

Pretty insane if they're rolling it back to still just the one lane slows down. If they really want to keep that then at least make it mandatory to move as far over as possible.
btimbit is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:56 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy