Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-17-2023, 11:56 AM   #21
ComixZone
Franchise Player
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CSharp View Post
I need to visualize the faces for each name. Can you provide the ASCII display for each player?
I got you something else.

ComixZone is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to ComixZone For This Useful Post:
Old 01-17-2023, 02:29 PM   #22
midniteowl
Franchise Player
 
midniteowl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaskal View Post
Yeah same IMO. Rasmus should shoot more and doesn't. So give it to Stone who not only likes to crank it, it has enough power that he puts the fear of god in PK forwards when he winds up in space.


Huberdeau - Half wall guy on the left
Kadri - Bumper
Stone - Point Clapper
Toffoli - Net Front Presence (maybe he'll hit more nets and less posts from in tight, lol)
Lindholm - Half wall guy on the right

I think not only that, his decision is a second or 2 too slow. Whether shooting or passing, he just does it a tad bit too slow. It seems like opposite knew what he's gonna do before he does.
midniteowl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2023, 02:33 PM   #23
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Andersson has just shown, for now what, 80+ games? A general reluctance to shoot way too often in critical times. There is a tendency to look for perfect passing plays rather than shoot and crash or shoot and look for a rebound.

Andersson is the biggest problem with the PK because it’s designed for a point shot for a guy that doesn’t shoot.
Mr.Coffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2023, 02:38 PM   #24
redforever
Franchise Player
 
redforever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Exp:
Default

Put Lindholm back to the right of the goalie...like he was last year. That was his sweet spot. So basically, switch Huberdeau and Lindholm.
redforever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2023, 03:11 PM   #25
dobbles
addition by subtraction
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Tulsa, OK
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone View Post
I got you something else.
thanked for the super old sandra bullock reference!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era View Post
This individual is not affluent and more of a member of that shrinking middle class. It is likely the individual does not have a high paying job, is limited on benefits, and has to make due with those benefits provided by employer.
dobbles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2023, 05:41 PM   #26
Classic_Sniper
#1 Goaltender
 
Classic_Sniper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Exp:
Default

Honestly, I don't know if the PP can fix itself this season with some for of intervention (i.e. trade). We're well past the half way into the season and this team is actually getting kind of worse I think. After the first month of the season (October), the team started off red hot as the 7th ranked PP at 26.9%. Since then, we've looked like the 29th ranked PP at 17.8% ahead of only 3 bottom feeders.

The powerplay coaches and systems are the exact same as last season's top 10 powerplay. Lindholm, Andersson and Toffoli are still here, so that's 3 out of the same 5. They have similar looks with Rasmus at the point, Toffoli as the trigger man on his off wing. Lindholm manning the right flank or switching over to the slot. Huberdeau has primarily played on the left flank this season which is exactly where he played in Florida.

So really, it just comes down to execution which in my opinion is the biggest culprit. The powerplay right now has established no credible threats anywhere on the ice, everything is telegraphed, nothing dangerous from the point, the flanks, the side of the net or the slot. So the opposition PK doesn't even bother cheating or moving from their structure. They just need to stand there and wait for the Flames to pass it around and shoot low percentage shots.

Until the Flames can find the right personnel or the current group can find a way to create more chaos or put the opposition under more duress, then I don't see anything changing. Where are the one timers, the rocket from the point, the seam, one touch and slap passes?

There's really nothing out of the ordinary and I feel like the coaching staff has given up on the fancy stuff recently and has just told them to get the puck on goal and starting jamming away for rebounds. I suppose this strategy can work, but it doesn't feel dangerous compared to say the Oiler's PP which is just frightening to defend and you always feel on edge. But then again, we don't have a McDavid and Draisaitl who can matrix the system.
Classic_Sniper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2023, 11:17 PM   #27
DeluxeMoustache
 
DeluxeMoustache's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

I wonder how much the PP is dictated by the coaches and how much freedom they have within the structure

Can’t help but notice that Tkachuk in Florida does precisely what he did here. Spends time screening, which is good if there is a shot, or drifts slightly to the goalie’s left, to receive a quick pass and make that quick touch pass out front, of which Lindholm was the beneficiary

It’s not uncommon and it is effective

I wonder why nobody here does it regularly and well
DeluxeMoustache is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2023, 02:21 PM   #28
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

This is pretty telling.

Missing Gaudreau for entries and setups.

https://twitter.com/user/status/1615490050766311425
Bingo is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
Old 01-18-2023, 02:41 PM   #29
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Need to see last year to compare.

I haven't really thought entry was an issue but I guess I'm wrong. I thought it was more what they did/didn't do once they were in.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2023, 02:58 PM   #30
Monahammer
Franchise Player
 
Monahammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Alberta
Exp:
Default

Step 1: Lock Sutter in a dark room with a video of horses and barley

Step 2: Tell huberdeau to explain his favourite powerplay strategies to the other players on PP1. The strategies that have made him one of the best PP producers in the league over the last 5 seasons.

Step 3: don't tell Darryl about the changed powerplay strategy

Step 4: players roll out different strategy for powerplay specifically

Step 5: be prepared to bag skate next practice for disobeying, but if you score on enough pps in a row, this might stop
Monahammer is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2023, 03:53 PM   #31
Naitix
Scoring Winger
 
Naitix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Exp:
Default

I do not think our zone entries on PP have been a problem, I bet the low carry rating is due to Flames dumping and chasing the puck for zone entries on the PP which works surprisingly okay. The issues are with their set up
Naitix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2023, 04:05 PM   #32
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Naitix View Post
I do not think our zone entries on PP have been a problem, I bet the low carry rating is due to Flames dumping and chasing the puck for zone entries on the PP which works surprisingly okay. The issues are with their set up
But that graphic suggests they're towards the bottom of the league in getting set up at all.
Bingo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2023, 04:20 PM   #33
HighLifeMan
First Line Centre
 
HighLifeMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Exp:
Default

Zone entries have without a doubt been the top unit's biggest issue. Kadri absolutely can not be relied upon to be the main focal point in that regard.

Huberdeau excels on the left halfwall. We all know this. Keep him there. In saying that, I believe having three right handed shots on the top unit with him really limits his options/looks from that area. We also really lack a defender who can walk the line effectively and create both shot and passing lanes. It's a shame Kylington isn't an option.

I wouldn't say Toffoli has been terrible but he definitely lacks the ability to move the puck efficiently and quickly. The top unit specifically becomes far to stagnant and lacks movement. This really hurts a guy like Huberdeau who is predominately a stationary playmaker.

To me the PP needs to focus far more on moving the puck quickly and with less predictability. I don't think it can run efficiently through Andersson as it's currently set up.
HighLifeMan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to HighLifeMan For This Useful Post:
Old 01-18-2023, 04:22 PM   #34
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

I noticed they’re doing the bump back pass as of about 4-5 games ago to adjust for entry. So weird how it’s like the only way NHL teams can effectively gain entry nowadays without dumping it in.
Mr.Coffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2023, 04:23 PM   #35
Naitix
Scoring Winger
 
Naitix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
But that graphic suggests they're towards the bottom of the league in getting set up at all.

Right, I guess my misunderstanding what exactly is carry and setup. Like if Flames are at 35% setup, does that mean they spend on average 42 seconds being setup on the powerplay? Then what does carry exactly mean
Naitix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2023, 04:25 PM   #36
Macho0978
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone View Post
I don’t think Stone should be on it. For as big as his shot is, he seems to have little control of it. Too low skill. Removing Andersson is a fine choice, but our trigger men should 100% be Lindholm and Toffoli.

1. Net-front: Kadri
2. Post-position for close one-timers/net-front (left-side): Toffoli
3. Right circle: Lindholm
4. Left side half-boards: Huberdeau
5. Centre point man: Weegar

That’s your 5 in my eyes

PP2:

1. Net-front: Coleman
2. Post-position for close one-timers/net-front (right-side): Dube
3. Left circle: Mangiapane
4. Right side half-boards: Backlund
5. Centre point man: Hanifin

Effectively flip the deployment on PP2 so you’re heavier on opposite sides depending on which unit it is.
I like your PP1 for sure, and Rasmus can be frustrating, but he also is on pace for back-to-back 50-point seasons. Hard to take him off both PP units.

Hanifin can skate but he makes safe choices offensively and those choices aren't valuable on the PP. Always dumps it in and floats easy saves into the goalie's glove. He's just not a PP guy.
Macho0978 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2023, 04:27 PM   #37
Naitix
Scoring Winger
 
Naitix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Exp:
Default

I think Hanifin is just not creative enough for the powerplay, he is more of a simple play guy
Naitix is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Naitix For This Useful Post:
Old 01-18-2023, 04:30 PM   #38
TrentCrimmIndependent
Franchise Player
 
TrentCrimmIndependent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Richmond upon Thames, London
Exp:
Default

one word:

MacKenzie Weegar
TrentCrimmIndependent is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to TrentCrimmIndependent For This Useful Post:
Old 01-18-2023, 04:32 PM   #39
Macho0978
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Naitix View Post
I think Hanifin is just not creative enough for the powerplay, he is more of a simple play guy
He is the Backlund of defense. Always make the safe play, puts a puck on net that is an easy save no rebound because face offs down low are valuable. Not on the PP.

Hanifin and Toffoli are the masters at having a tired PK and putting low percent shots on net and getting the other team the needed change.
Macho0978 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2023, 04:35 PM   #40
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Honestly, getting the puck on net for the current PP design would be a step up from “pass it to the side boards” Andersson.
Mr.Coffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:57 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy