Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-01-2022, 04:35 PM   #21
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by djsFlames View Post
In theory an Edmontonian could get to the mountains faster going from vacuum train to car/bus in yyc than driving there directly.

It's funny but also points out why we need to smother this thing in the cradle, along with the other myriad of reasons.
Yeah, but Calgarians can go see a river valley similar to ones in most cities, view Soviet style architecture, and and shop at 5 Aldo stores in one mall.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to FlamesAddiction For This Useful Post:
Old 09-01-2022, 04:40 PM   #22
MarchHare
Franchise Player
 
MarchHare's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: YSJ (1979-2002) -> YYC (2002-2022) -> YVR (2022-present)
Exp:
Default

Elon Musk recently admitted that the Hyperloop was a fraud all along just to stop California's public investment in high-speed rail. I'm sure this company is totally legit and not at all an investment scam, though. Anyone know if the owners/executives at this TransPod company have any ties to the UCP?

Quote:
Musk admitted to his biographer Ashlee Vance that Hyperloop was all about trying to get legislators to cancel plans for high-speed rail in California—even though he had no plans to build it.
https://time.com/6203815/elon-musk-f...naire-visions/
MarchHare is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to MarchHare For This Useful Post:
Old 09-01-2022, 05:17 PM   #23
timun
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
...using groundbreaking technology based on a new field of physics called "veillance flux."
Spoiler!


Seems a little sus...
timun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2022, 06:19 PM   #24
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Knut View Post
How dare you sully the good name of Lyle Lanley by making that comparison.

Sure, his monorail fell apart, but at least he built it. This snake oil will never get that far.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
Old 09-01-2022, 07:41 PM   #25
SebC
tromboner
 
SebC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction View Post
Clearly this would benefit Edmonton more than Calgary.
Quote:
Originally Posted by djsFlames View Post
In theory an Edmontonian could get to the mountains faster going from vacuum train to car/bus in yyc than driving there directly.
It might also specifically benefit Calgary MLAs.
SebC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2022, 08:05 PM   #26
djsFlames
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction View Post
Yeah, but Calgarians can go see a river valley similar to ones in most cities, view Soviet style architecture, and and shop at 5 Aldo stores in one mall.
I kind of want to see the bibliotank so I can laugh hysterically at it.

If you ever needed architectural street comedy in your life, Edmonton is the place to go.
djsFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2022, 08:14 PM   #27
You Need a Thneed
Voted for Kodos
 
You Need a Thneed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Because Monorails / Maglev have taken off in so many places around the world!

Let’s build one that’s even more complicated.
__________________
My LinkedIn Profile.
You Need a Thneed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2022, 08:16 PM   #28
SebC
tromboner
 
SebC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by You Need a Thneed View Post
Because Monorails / Maglev have taken off in so many places around the world!
Only when things go very, very wrong.
SebC is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to SebC For This Useful Post:
Old 09-01-2022, 08:26 PM   #29
Hi-Psi
Scoring Winger
 
Hi-Psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

If there was ever going to be a Hyperloop or something similar, there would be one in Ontario before there would be one in Alberta.
__________________
Mortgage's - @MortgageFromHome
Hi-Psi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2022, 09:08 PM   #30
bizaro86
Franchise Player
 
bizaro86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hi-Psi View Post
If there was ever going to be a Hyperloop or something similar, there would be one in Ontario before there would be one in Alberta.
I mean, these things end up going where a government with money to burn wants to make a statement. So in many ways Alberta is more likely than Ontario.

But even with that factor I think I'd rather be the 3rd or 4th getting built not the first.
bizaro86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2022, 09:39 PM   #31
SebC
tromboner
 
SebC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bizaro86 View Post
I mean, these things end up going where a government with money to burn wants to make a statement.
That statement:

"If pipelines are safe for people, then surely they're safe for hydrocarbons!"
SebC is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to SebC For This Useful Post:
Old 09-02-2022, 08:29 AM   #32
calf
broke the first rule
 
calf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SebC View Post
That statement:

"If pipelines are safe for people, then surely they're safe for hydrocarbons!"
Think of the issues if it started to leak Edmontonians
calf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2022, 09:11 AM   #33
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blankall View Post
Only $18 billion. The government seems to have that kind of money lying around. I guess theoretically Alberta will have about $4 billion dollar surplus this year. There are worse options than using it on an infrastructure project.

The project might be more useful in the London to Montreal area. Not sure how many people actually even travel between Edmonton and Calgary.

I do think this would be pretty cool. Maybe worth taking a loss on (with heavy federal backing that is) just to try it out, and the Alberta corridor is a solid test subject.
Budget surplus aside, this thing has never been built or even field tested, so its all hypothetical and untested, so yeah, 18 billion seems wildly optimistic, plus we've seen what construction budgets mean.

I would assume that the power requirements to propel a train crammed with people through a vacuum tube multiple times a day is going to be large.

There are some low speed examples, but no high speed ones built from what I understand.

Just reading articles, for a high speed one like we're talking about it was calculated at a cost of $100 million per km. China seems to think they can build one for 18 million per km, but we all know about how honest the Chinese are when they talk about something like this.

Even at a theoretical cost above which is $30,000,000,000. And that's with a much lower worker salary level in China or India

https://newatlas.com/terraspan-vacuu...ra-fast/23267/

What would people be willing to pay to take this thing between Calgary and Edmonton. I mean the cost to fly from Calgary to Edmonton is what $250 bones. What would people be willing to pay to take a train.

Double? Triple?

So lets say $750.00. Just to defray a theoretical $18 billion dollar cost would require 24,000,000 paying passengers, and that's not including defraying ongoing costs.

And would people pay that much regularly when a flight to Edmonton is 50 minutes, versus what 13 minutes by train?

If we were talking a tube to connect Calgary to Toronto where you could be in Toronto in an hour as opposed to what 8? Maybe but the cost at a 100 mil a km would be 400 billion.

They're talking about this because it sounds cool, not because its something that should be built.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2022, 09:16 AM   #34
agulati
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

On a semi-related note, I’d rather there be more of a focus towards high speed rail in Alberta. Be it Calgary-Edmonton or Calgary-Banff.
agulati is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to agulati For This Useful Post:
Old 09-02-2022, 09:27 AM   #35
bizaro86
Franchise Player
 
bizaro86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch View Post
And would people pay that much regularly when a flight to Edmonton is 50 minutes, versus what 13 minutes by train?
I go to Edmonton sometimes, and never fly, because between getting to the airport for check-in, security, flying, and then cab from Leduc to Edmonton it isn't much if any faster than driving.

I agree this isn't very plausible, but I think a standard high speed rail corridor would be great. Ideally Edmonton-Calgary-Banff. But knowing politicians we'd probably get. Calgary-Airdrie-Red Deer-Leduc-Edmonton. And a separate line from a different part of Calgary with stops in Cochrane, Morley, and Canmore before you get to Banff.
bizaro86 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to bizaro86 For This Useful Post:
Old 09-02-2022, 09:38 AM   #36
Ozy_Flame

Posted the 6 millionth post!
 
Ozy_Flame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Exp:
Default

I agree with bizaro86. Flying between Calgary and Edmonton makes zero sense. It's just as long and more expensive to do so. You basically only do that if its covered or you have some sort of flight coupon. I had to do the commute almost every 1-2 weeks for years. Far easier to hop in a car and drive.

HSR is probably the most realistic option, and would still garner overwhelming support as long as there is a financially viable plan to do so. And having it continue on to Banff National Park is a huge win for the province (and heck, why not to Jasper from Edmonton too, maybe in partnership with the RME) .

Imagine having to go to either town and taking the HSR option on a cold Winter evening. That would be fantastic instead of driving.
Ozy_Flame is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Ozy_Flame For This Useful Post:
Old 09-04-2022, 12:07 PM   #37
GP_Matt
First Line Centre
 
GP_Matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Edmonton
Exp:
Default

I don't think for a minute that this will get built but so far no one has mentioned the funding source. From what I have heard, the proponents are targeting the Canada Infrastructure Bank for funding. I could see them getting a decent "loan" to study this and create some slightly more detailed plans. Then proclaim that it isn't cost effective and walk away from the loan. The CIB mission is to kickstart investment and this could fit that definition.
High speed rail in the corridor has been studied extensively and they can't get past the fact that not enough people will be willing to pay for the trip at a breakeven cost.
GP_Matt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2023, 06:04 PM   #38
para transit fellow
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Exp:
Default

The hyperloop is dead for real this time

Hyperloop One, formerly Virgin Hyperloop, is reportedly selling off its assets, laying off its remaining workers, and preparing to shut down by the end of 2023. It was a dream too impossible for this world.

https://www.theverge.com/2023/12/21/...sing-elon-musk
para transit fellow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2023, 06:09 PM   #39
Locke
Franchise Player
 
Locke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by para transit fellow View Post
The hyperloop is dead for real this time

Hyperloop One, formerly Virgin Hyperloop, is reportedly selling off its assets, laying off its remaining workers, and preparing to shut down by the end of 2023. It was a dream too impossible for this world.

https://www.theverge.com/2023/12/21/...sing-elon-musk
It had assets and workers?
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!

This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.

The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans

If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
Locke is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Locke For This Useful Post:
Old 12-22-2023, 07:12 AM   #40
Bigtime
Franchise Player
 
Bigtime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I for one am shocked, SHOCKED that this happened.
Bigtime is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Bigtime For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:43 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy