Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-24-2022, 10:26 AM   #21
GoinAllTheWay
Franchise Player
 
GoinAllTheWay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Not sure
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lubicon View Post
Hard no but we DO need to get serious and increase our capabilities for patrolling the arctic. Along with our coastal areas. Defence spending has been pathetically low in this country for far too long.
This. This should be our priority right now.
GoinAllTheWay is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GoinAllTheWay For This Useful Post:
Old 03-24-2022, 10:38 AM   #22
Skaloper
First Line Centre
 
Skaloper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: BC
Exp:
Default

I don't think Canada needs nukes but we definitely need the ability to shoot down a Nuclear missile before it reaches population centers. I wonder what ability we have to intercept a missile given where technology is now. I am slightly worried that the US wouldn't care if they shot down nuclear missiles over Canada.
Skaloper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2022, 10:49 AM   #23
Sliver
evil of fart
 
Sliver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lubicon View Post
Hard no but we DO need to get serious and increase our capabilities for patrolling the arctic. Along with our coastal areas. Defence spending has been pathetically low in this country for far too long.
We need to face the fact that we can't defend the Arctic and we'll never be able to afford what it would cost to do so. It's ours on maps for now, but whoever wants it and wants to put the money, manpower and resources into holding it will ultimately own it.
Sliver is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Sliver For This Useful Post:
Old 03-24-2022, 10:54 AM   #24
Hack&Lube
Atomic Nerd
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sliver View Post
We need to face the fact that we can't defend the Arctic and we'll never be able to afford what it would cost to do so. It's ours on maps for now, but whoever wants it and wants to put the money, manpower and resources into holding it will ultimately own it.
What Canada needs to do is invest in a home grown drone industry and use those to patrol our vast reaches instead of wasting more billions on failed attempts at buying more costly fighter jets which require costly crews and costly maintenance.

Turkey has done very well developing and selling their drones and seeing them implemented in the Ukraine.
Hack&Lube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2022, 10:56 AM   #25
Zoller
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Zoller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Exp:
Default

Not worth the money

Plus Americans subsidize our defence with their lack of healthcare.

We've got a pretty good deal going tbh.
Zoller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2022, 11:01 AM   #26
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hack&Lube View Post
What Canada needs to do is invest in a home grown drone industry and use those to patrol our vast reaches instead of wasting more billions on failed attempts at buying more costly fighter jets which require costly crews and costly maintenance.

Turkey has done very well developing and selling their drones and seeing them implemented in the Ukraine.

You still need fighter jet response and capability. Drones are not even close to providing autonomous air defense at this point. As well they are more vulnerable to cyber attacks and Electronic war far.


Also the battle for the Arctic is going to be fought as much below the surface. Building a proper sensor net for intelligence gathering is going to be key as the first step to seize the arctic is a denial of access by ships and conventional forces.



Canada can no longer afford to cheap out on defense spending. As much as we talk about increasing defense spending to 2%, that's basically only a start because we've neglected things for so long with the Libs and Conservatives, that we're fighting with the best of 80's and at best 90's technology. We have serious recruiting issues and even more serious retention issues.



The 2% would be nice, but honestly the armed forces needs a rapid injection of proper capital spending to remain viable, period. We'd get slaughtered right now in any kind of modern battlefield.



As much as we talk about being deployable and all that stuff. Even the smallest deployments in force right now requires a long period of rest of refurbishment afterwards. Our armed forces are old, rusting, tired under capable and the people that would potentially look at it as a career won't do it right now because it looks like a joke.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2022, 11:17 AM   #27
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sliver View Post
We need to face the fact that we can't defend the Arctic and we'll never be able to afford what it would cost to do so. It's ours on maps for now, but whoever wants it and wants to put the money, manpower and resources into holding it will ultimately own it.
To be honest, I never understood why just because some British sailors saw the islands and declared them property of Britain, and later Canada; that they are legally ours. I don't think this type of land claim process would hold up to modern sensibilities.

I think one of the main reasons why the Nunavut territory was incorporated was to make an agreement between Canada and Inuit to ensure Canadian sovereignty over the eastern and extreme northern Arctic. They (Inuit) agreed to recognize the authority of the Canadian government in exchange for a level of autonomy and self-government. That whole area of the Arctic is traditional Inuit territory and Canada's best hope for Arctic sovereignty is to maintain that relationship. It doesn't help with military defense, but on a legal level when it comes to international disputes, it is the one thing that Canada has going for it at the moment as it is hard to for anyone to argue (even Russia) that the area isn't traditional Inuit territory and they now have a governing agreement with Canada that would stand up to international scrutiny.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."

Last edited by FlamesAddiction; 03-24-2022 at 11:20 AM.
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2022, 11:17 AM   #28
undercoverbrother
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sylvan Lake
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch View Post
We'd get slaughtered right now in any kind of modern battlefield.
.
I disagree, I think we would be fine.

By the time we got to the battle it will have been done for 3 weeks.
__________________
Captain James P. DeCOSTE, CD, 18 Sep 1993

Corporal Jean-Marc H. BECHARD, 6 Aug 1993
undercoverbrother is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to undercoverbrother For This Useful Post:
Old 03-24-2022, 11:20 AM   #29
PeteMoss
Franchise Player
 
PeteMoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction View Post
To be honest, I never understood why just because some British sailors saw the islands and declared them property of Britain, and later Canada; that they are legally ours. I don't think this type of land claim process would hold up to modern sensibilities.

I think one of the main reasons why the Nunavut territory was incorporated was to make an agreement between Canada and Inuit to ensure Canadian sovereignty over the eastern and extreme northern Arctic. They (Inuit) agreed to recognize the authority of the Canadian government in exchange for a level of autonomy and self-government. That whole area of the Arctic is traditional Inuit territory and Canada's best hope for Arctic sovereignty is to maintain that relationship. It doesn't help with military defense, but on a legal level when it comes to international disputes, it is the one thing that Canada has going for it at the moment.
Wouldn't that same logic apply to all of Canada? It was found and declared French/British property.

Last edited by PeteMoss; 03-24-2022 at 11:22 AM.
PeteMoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2022, 04:26 PM   #30
Barnes
Franchise Player
 
Barnes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Violating Copyrights
Exp:
Default

When we finish our new sidearm procurement in 17 years, we can talk about nukes.
Barnes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2022, 05:03 PM   #31
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

The perfect amount of Nukes anybody should have is zero. So no, Canada should not IMO. Plus our continent is protected by the Americans and their arsenal.
__________________
"Everybody's so desperate to look smart that nobody is having fun anymore" -Jackie Redmond
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2022, 05:42 PM   #32
SportsJunky
Uncle Chester
 
SportsJunky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Exp:
Default

Imagine Chris Barber and Pat King successfully overthrowing the government and getting their hillbilly hands on the nukes.
SportsJunky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2022, 05:47 PM   #33
Locke
Franchise Player
 
Locke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
Exp:
Default

I suggest we ask Mr. Heston what he thinks...
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!

This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.

The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans

If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
Locke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2022, 05:47 PM   #34
Fire
Franchise Player
 
Fire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
The perfect amount of Nukes anybody should have is zero. So no, Canada should not IMO. Plus our continent is protected by the Americans and their arsenal.
No nukes means a lot more wars between major powers.
__________________

Fire is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Fire For This Useful Post:
Old 03-24-2022, 06:25 PM   #35
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

We cannot afford Nukes AND a dental plan
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Old 03-24-2022, 07:17 PM   #36
Johnny Makarov
Franchise Player
 
Johnny Makarov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Exp:
Default

Hell yes! We are talking about nuclear power plants right?
__________________
Peter12 "I'm no Trump fan but he is smarter than most if not everyone in this thread. ”
Johnny Makarov is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Johnny Makarov For This Useful Post:
Old 03-24-2022, 07:36 PM   #37
btimbit
Franchise Player
 
btimbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: St. George's, Grenada
Exp:
Default

We can't even buy boots and sleeping bags, how the hell do we pull off acquiring nukes?

Last edited by btimbit; 03-24-2022 at 08:44 PM. Reason: I spell goodly
btimbit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2022, 07:49 PM   #38
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

I hate that this is a topic of discussion that is a valid one to have right now.

No to Nukes.
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Vinny01 For This Useful Post:
Old 03-24-2022, 08:39 PM   #39
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zoller View Post
Not worth the money

Plus Americans subsidize our defence with their lack of healthcare.

We've got a pretty good deal going tbh.
I am thankful to live in a country where our only land borders are with a friendly country. Look around the world and see what other places are like, and it's a real luxury. Doubly so when that country is a super power. Do we take advantage of it more than we should? Maybe. But the thing is, Canada's security is probably just as important to the U.S. as it is to Canada.

As for the cost of nuclear weapons, it would be stupid expensive, but if Canada really wanted to, we would find a way to pay for it. It's really just not worth it.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2022, 08:40 PM   #40
btimbit
Franchise Player
 
btimbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: St. George's, Grenada
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
We cannot afford Nukes AND a dental plan
Lisa needs braces
btimbit is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to btimbit For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:30 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy