Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-13-2021, 10:01 AM   #21
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toonage View Post
Been rumored they were after Eichel. This will help.
Thought about this again, and I don't see how.

They'll be in trouble in a couple years, and Eichel will probably once again be miserable hanging about in a poorly managed team.

It'd be a disaster. I hope they do it!
PepsiFree is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to PepsiFree For This Useful Post:
Old 07-13-2021, 10:02 AM   #22
Canada 02
Franchise Player
 
Canada 02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Exp:
Default

signed 13 years for $98M; played 9 years, will get $94.7M
Canada 02 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2021, 10:02 AM   #23
TheScorpion
First round-bust
 
TheScorpion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: speculating about AHL players
Exp:
Default

This is one of the most galaxy-brained decisions I've seen an NHL team make in a very long time.
__________________
Need a great deal on a new or pre-owned car? Come see me at Platinum Mitsubishi — 2720 Barlow Trail NE

TheScorpion is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to TheScorpion For This Useful Post:
Old 07-13-2021, 10:03 AM   #24
Scroopy Noopers
Pent-up
 
Scroopy Noopers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Plutanamo Bay.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion View Post
This is one of the most galaxy-brained decisions I've seen an NHL team make in a very long time.
Back to back days with moves I would have scoffed at as unlikely.

Keep it coming! Best off-season ever!
Scroopy Noopers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2021, 10:07 AM   #25
gvitaly
Franchise Player
 
gvitaly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion View Post
This is one of the most galaxy-brained decisions I've seen an NHL team make in a very long time.
I think the Wild shot themselves in the foot with that one. Especially with Suter. I think the Wild were better off losing a good player to the expansion draft.
gvitaly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2021, 10:08 AM   #26
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

Have to think the Kaprizov talks haven’t gone too well, where they’re only going to be able to sign him to a high $, 1-2 year deal. Probably going all in for this season before rebuilding during those dead space years. That’s the only thing I’m coming up with.

Suter and Parise had to have made things hard on BG and refused to waive. At least Suter is still a serviceable defenseman and could’ve been had for really cheap. It was just the NMCs holding things back. Guess Minnesota really wanted to keep Dumba and have an extra forward spot to protect someone.

Does this make Suter a guy Seattle can pick from Minnesota? Or does he no longer become an option to be chosen from Minnesota because of the buy out?
ForeverFlameFan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2021, 10:08 AM   #27
codynw
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default

I wouldn't be surprised if one or both of them re-signed with Minnesota for cheap after the expansion draft.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames View Post
Before you call me a pessimist or a downer, the Flames made me this way. Blame them.
codynw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2021, 10:09 AM   #28
CorsiHockeyLeague
Franchise Player
 
CorsiHockeyLeague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

Parise I get. Suter I do not get. His cap hit exceeds his value but it's still a better use of cap space than what the buyout does to them.

As for Parise, it seems to me he's kind of in a Corey Perry situation where someone will take a swing at him for cheap and maybe he just saves whatever he's got left for the playoffs if they make it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by codynw View Post
I wouldn't be surprised if one or both of them re-signed with Minnesota for cheap after the expansion draft.
Don't think this is allowed anymore is it?
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
CorsiHockeyLeague is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CorsiHockeyLeague For This Useful Post:
Old 07-13-2021, 10:09 AM   #29
1qqaaz
Franchise Player
 
1qqaaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Indiana
Exp:
Default

I don't think the Suter contract was nearly as bad as the Parise contract.
While they are basically structurally identical contracts, they definitely weren't equal quality in hindsight.
1qqaaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2021, 10:10 AM   #30
chummer
Franchise Player
 
chummer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion View Post
This is one of the most galaxy-brained decisions I've seen an NHL team make since yesterday
fyp
chummer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2021, 10:11 AM   #31
TheScorpion
First round-bust
 
TheScorpion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: speculating about AHL players
Exp:
Default

Touché, but I think this is much crazier.
__________________
Need a great deal on a new or pre-owned car? Come see me at Platinum Mitsubishi — 2720 Barlow Trail NE

TheScorpion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2021, 10:11 AM   #32
Monahammer
Franchise Player
 
Monahammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Alberta
Exp:
Default

I can't believe they actually bought them out. IMO terrible move... they are screwed if they falter this year. Breakout team taking a step back in the 2nd season? Never happens...
Monahammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2021, 10:12 AM   #33
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverFlameFan View Post
Have to think the Kaprizov talks haven’t gone too well, where they’re only going to be able to sign him to a high $, 1-2 year deal. Probably going all in for this season before rebuilding during those dead space years. That’s the only thing I’m coming up with.

Suter and Parise had to have made things hard on BG and refused to waive. At least Suter is still a serviceable defenseman and could’ve been had for really cheap. It was just the NMCs holding things back. Guess Minnesota really wanted to keep Dumba and have an extra forward spot to protect someone.

Does this make Suter a guy Seattle can pick from Minnesota? Or does he no longer become an option to be chosen from Minnesota because of the buy out?
Seattle can sign him on FA day as will 30 other teams.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2021, 10:16 AM   #34
Skaloper
First Line Centre
 
Skaloper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: BC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by codynw View Post
I wouldn't be surprised if one or both of them re-signed with Minnesota for cheap after the expansion draft.
They can't sign with the same team for at least one year.

Edit: Oops that was only for Compliance Buyouts

Last edited by Skaloper; 07-13-2021 at 10:21 AM.
Skaloper is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2021, 10:16 AM   #35
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

They must not have liked the side deals they needed to make with Seattle to protect Dumba.
Vinny01 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2021, 10:16 AM   #36
TheScorpion
First round-bust
 
TheScorpion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: speculating about AHL players
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skaloper View Post
They can't sign with the same team for at least one year.
No, they can. That was only the case with compliance buyouts.

Remember Michael Stone?
__________________
Need a great deal on a new or pre-owned car? Come see me at Platinum Mitsubishi — 2720 Barlow Trail NE

TheScorpion is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TheScorpion For This Useful Post:
Old 07-13-2021, 10:17 AM   #37
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skaloper View Post
They can't sign with the same team for at least one year.
Not true.

How did the Flames buyout Michael Stone and re-sign him the same summer?
Vinny01 is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Vinny01 For This Useful Post:
Old 07-13-2021, 10:20 AM   #38
MrMike
Franchise Player
 
MrMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Van Island
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion View Post
No, they can. That was only the case with compliance buyouts.

Remember Michael Stone?
Michael Stone was an exception to the rule. He was bought out and then we had an injury so we resigned him. I believe they aren’t allowed to sign if it’s for cap circumvention.
MrMike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2021, 10:21 AM   #39
Flames1217
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Exp:
icon57

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
Not true.

How did the Flames buyout Michael Stone and re-sign him the same summer?
I think the flames had to prove that it wasn't the initial plan and the signing had to get the league's approval if I remember correctly.
Flames1217 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Flames1217 For This Useful Post:
Old 07-13-2021, 10:22 AM   #40
TheScorpion
First round-bust
 
TheScorpion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: speculating about AHL players
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMike View Post
Michael Stone was an exception to the rule. He was bought out and then we had an injury so we resigned him. I believe they aren’t allowed to sign if it’s for cap circumvention.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames1217 View Post
I think the flames had to prove that it wasn't the initial plan and the signing had to get the league's approval if I remember correctly.
There is no such rule preventing it.

Per capfriendly:

Quote:
For one season following a compliance buyout, players were not permitted to rejoin the team which performed the buyout (this restriction does not exist for normal buyouts).
__________________
Need a great deal on a new or pre-owned car? Come see me at Platinum Mitsubishi — 2720 Barlow Trail NE

TheScorpion is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:50 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy