Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-28-2017, 09:40 AM   #21
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Based on his shooting percentage and really poor possession numbers, Anderson was extremely lucky last season and any significant investment made for him will likely be a poor move. 103.2 PDO, too. This would be like trading for Bouma after his one good season with the Flames.
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2017, 10:17 AM   #22
Love
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Exp:
Default

Would be a solid pick up for the right price.
Love is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2017, 10:20 AM   #23
Love
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Backlunds_socks View Post
Tre has made some bad moves, Lazar, Shinkuruk and this could end up being another.
Tre has made some good moves, Hamilton, Frolik and this could end up being another.
Love is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Love For This Useful Post:
Old 09-28-2017, 10:25 AM   #24
Jiggy
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Backlunds_socks View Post
Tre has made some bad moves, Lazar, Shinkuruk and this could end up being another.
Lazar has been with the Flames for 6 months and you already call it a bad move? Remember how many people said Backlund was a bad prospect who would be an NHL tweener?
Jiggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2017, 10:26 AM   #25
Lanny_McDonald
Franchise Player
 
Lanny_McDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

I dunno. Travis Yost says to stay away. He had a 14.3% SH% last season. Certainly headed toward 12 goals this season.
Lanny_McDonald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2017, 10:28 AM   #26
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Backlunds_socks View Post
Tre has made some bad moves, Lazar, Shinkuruk and this could end up being another.
Treliving's "bad moves": Raymond, Bollig, Brouwer and with your list of Lazar and Shinkaruk...

Treliving's good moves: Hamilton and Hamonic acquisitions (and more solid moves but these two trades alone already say enough about him).

The good outweighs the little baby bad ones by a large margin.
ForeverFlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ForeverFlameFan For This Useful Post:
Old 09-28-2017, 10:30 AM   #27
868904
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Anderson is a tough kid, having him and Ferland, Tkachuk and Bennett on the team would be killer for the playoffs.

In the Summer I pondered about a Jankowski deal for him. The Jackets are desperate again for a big centre after trading Johansen. I'm not sure I'd do that. Jankowski is a tantalizing prospect, highly skilled and that big and a centre. I've been really impressed with his shot this pre-season, he's scored a couple of lazers. But other than Jankowski, I don't see what else Columbus would be interested in.
__________________
Calgary Flames, PLEASE GO TO THE NET! AND SHOOT THE PUCK! GENERATING OFFENSE IS NOT DIFFICULT! SKATE HARD, SHOOT HARD, CRASH THE NET HARD!

Last edited by 868904; 09-28-2017 at 10:33 AM.
868904 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2017, 10:31 AM   #28
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

nm

Last edited by Ashasx; 09-28-2017 at 10:38 AM.
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2017, 10:34 AM   #29
442scotty
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

I jumped on the let’s get him bandwagon but ... who is this guy anyway ?
442scotty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2017, 10:34 AM   #30
indes
First Line Centre
 
indes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sherwood Park, AB
Exp:
Default

We need a top end RW, not more 3rd liner/2nd liner tweeners. Not interested with the likely cost involved.
indes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2017, 10:36 AM   #31
868904
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverFlameFan View Post
Treliving's "bad moves": Raymond, Bollig, Brouwer and with your list of Lazar and Shinkaruk...

Treliving's good moves: Hamilton and Hamonic acquisitions (and more solid moves but these two trades alone already say enough about him).

The good outweighs the little baby bad ones by a large margin.
Yes and Raymond was a relatively cheap free agent signing, Bollig cost a 3rd; both were not high asset costs. Brouwer may be the worst move Tre has made as it has a big asset cost, but there's still a chance that can turn around, though i'm not holding my breath for that to happen.

The Lazar and Shinkaruk deals are fine. Lazar for a 2nd was fair value given the potential of both assets. Flames were going to lose Granlund anyways cause Hartley didn't know how to use him properly.
__________________
Calgary Flames, PLEASE GO TO THE NET! AND SHOOT THE PUCK! GENERATING OFFENSE IS NOT DIFFICULT! SKATE HARD, SHOOT HARD, CRASH THE NET HARD!
868904 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2017, 10:37 AM   #32
868904
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
that is ridiculous
Damn you are fast! I was just adding more to it!
__________________
Calgary Flames, PLEASE GO TO THE NET! AND SHOOT THE PUCK! GENERATING OFFENSE IS NOT DIFFICULT! SKATE HARD, SHOOT HARD, CRASH THE NET HARD!
868904 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2017, 10:46 AM   #33
Love
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 868904 View Post
Anderson is a tough kid, having him and Ferland, Tkachuk and Bennett on the team would be killer for the playoffs.

In the Summer I pondered about a Jankowski deal for him. The Jackets are desperate again for a big centre after trading Johansen. I'm not sure I'd do that. Jankowski is a tantalizing prospect, highly skilled and that big and a centre. I've been really impressed with his shot this pre-season, he's scored a couple of lazers. But other than Jankowski, I don't see what else Columbus would be interested in.
Yeah, I really like him. He's like Columbus' Ferland. Big boy that flashes the ability to be special at times. He has that combination of skill and toughness that makes him more valuable to the team he plays for than on the open market.
Love is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2017, 10:56 AM   #34
Wastedyouth
Truculent!
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Exp:
Default

Anderson is basically another Lance Bouma.

Waste of an acquisition.
Wastedyouth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2017, 11:11 AM   #35
neo45
#1 Goaltender
 
neo45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Exp:
Icon45

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wastedyouth View Post
Anderson is basically another Lance Bouma.

Waste of an acquisition.
He is another Ferland. We would be smart to try and acquire him if the trade is reasonable and his demands fit our cost structure.
neo45 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to neo45 For This Useful Post:
Old 09-28-2017, 11:23 AM   #36
Wastedyouth
Truculent!
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by neo45 View Post
He is another Ferland. We would be smart to try and acquire him if the trade is reasonable and his demands fit our cost structure.
Incorrect,

Ferland was a beast in Junior and a solid player afterwards and still is.

Anderson is almost an identical version of Lance Bouma and will follow that career path.
Wastedyouth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2017, 11:29 AM   #37
neo45
#1 Goaltender
 
neo45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wastedyouth View Post
Incorrect,

Ferland was a beast in Junior and a solid player afterwards and still is.

Anderson is almost an identical version of Lance Bouma and will follow that career path.
Oh well if the stats from junior say it then it must be true


Anderson made world juniors so he was a very good junior player who has only gotten better.
neo45 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to neo45 For This Useful Post:
Old 09-28-2017, 12:02 PM   #38
Fire
Franchise Player
 
Fire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Anderson is a bottom 6 forward. Don't see the point on acquiring him unless they move Lazar/Brouwer in a deal to get him.
__________________

Fire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2017, 12:20 PM   #39
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Love how all these Josh Anderson "experts" have come out of the woodwork to tell us exactly how limited this young player's upside is. Somehow I'm not sure they're as expert on Anderson as they think they are.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
Old 09-28-2017, 12:35 PM   #40
Stud_McCool
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Stud_McCool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Exp:
Default

Wasn't Alex Chiasson supposed to be THAT guy? Didn't work out, move on...
Stud_McCool is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:21 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy