Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-01-2017, 09:47 PM   #21
d_phaneuf
Franchise Player
 
d_phaneuf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mdubz View Post
If the Avs wouldn't accept Hamonic and a 1st for Duchene, I highly doubt they would do a deal with a divisional rival with Ekholm as the center piece.
Ekholm has more value than hamonic
d_phaneuf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2017, 09:51 PM   #22
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Ekholm is also a left hand D, where as Hamonic is a RHD.

Colorado has Johnson and Barrie as their top 2 righties and want a lefty.
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2017, 10:08 PM   #23
timbit
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by d_phaneuf View Post
Ekholm has more value than hamonic
Who told you that? Same age,..same salary.

I'd love to see the evidence that substantiate your opinion.
timbit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2017, 10:31 PM   #24
djsFlames
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

Nashville needs more D depth why, exactly?

Like they're trying to be Calgary or something.
djsFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:14 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy