How would you grade the players' performance in 2016-17 thus far?

[Macho0978]

Originally Posted by GullFoss

this is silly. if c is average, then

number of "d" rankings = number of "b' rankings
number fo "f" rankings = number of "A" rankings

IMO, the players to get A/B's should be Johnson, Backlund, Hamilton, Versteeg, Frolik, Hathaway, Ferland, Tkachuk

The eight players with D/F's are Brouwer, Monahan, Brodie, Elliott, Bouma, Bennett, Wideman, Jokipakka

Players with C's: Johnny, Giordano, Kulak, Chiasson, Engelland, Hamilton, Shinkarauk, Stajan

C is average for sure but what if the teams has played for the most part above expectations? Then could the average mark be a B? Or more than half the players are above expectations?

I do agree most on here are a bit off as it appears some think everyone on team have been a C or better which is ridiculous for a team 3 games above .500. But on pace for about 90 points is a bit higher than I expected and if the play continues maybe this team makes the playoffs. So I gave more A's and B's then D's and F's because of this