Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-04-2016, 04:09 PM   #21
bax
#1 Goaltender
 
bax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Would be criminal to sit kulak after the way he played in San Josr
bax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2016, 04:16 PM   #22
hockey.modern
First Line Centre
 
hockey.modern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

I think Jokipakka would be the odd man out if Grossmann returns. Didn't that happen last time?
__________________
Sam "Beard" Bennett
hockey.modern is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2016, 05:09 PM   #23
TheScorpion
First round-bust
 
TheScorpion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: speculating about AHL players
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hockey.modern View Post
I think Jokipakka would be the odd man out if Grossmann returns. Didn't that happen last time?
Joki looked fine last night. Why is this move necessary?
__________________
Need a great deal on a new or pre-owned car? Come see me at Platinum Mitsubishi — 2720 Barlow Trail NE

TheScorpion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2016, 05:11 PM   #24
1qqaaz
Franchise Player
 
1qqaaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Indiana
Exp:
Default

If Calgary tries to play LA's style of game, the Flames are likely to lose. Calgary just can't do what LA does.

If the Flames beat LA, I think it'll be with speed.

Grossman would just make the Flames slower and more Suttery. I think the Flames should just use the same defense as the last game.
1qqaaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2016, 05:12 PM   #25
hockey.modern
First Line Centre
 
hockey.modern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion View Post
Joki looked fine last night. Why is this move necessary?
Same thing was said last time Jokipakka was scratched.
__________________
Sam "Beard" Bennett
hockey.modern is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2016, 05:32 PM   #26
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18 View Post
^ To be fair if we are using the stats against from that same site then Grossman is a better option than Jokipakka.

Jokipakka has a 5.84 GA/60 against LA in is career with a CF% of 34.8%.

Granted It's only been 40 minutes of ice time though so a pretty big sample bias, but still he has been abused by LA in his career.
Who cares about the Kings and their size? They have been just as mediocre out of the gate as the Flames this season and have issues scoring goals on anybody. I've never bought into the theory of changing things up to match your opponents as that means you are accepting that your opponent will dictate the game. If the Flames can't beat the Kings playing to their own strengths then they probably aren't going to be a very good team this season.
Erick Estrada is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2016, 05:44 PM   #27
Racki
First Line Centre
 
Racki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Exp:
Default

Excellent news! Let's hope he splits up all the D pairs again and moves Brodie back to the side where he's struggled so much. This coach is gonna be the death of me.
__________________
Racki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2016, 07:34 PM   #28
Vulcan
Franchise Player
 
Vulcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
Exp:
Default

As long as he sticks with the Brodie- Giordano pairing, I'm not outraged.
Vulcan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Vulcan For This Useful Post:
Old 11-04-2016, 08:01 PM   #29
Fire
Franchise Player
 
Fire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Grossman was solid in his last game. No problem seeing him in the line-up against a big physical team.
__________________

Fire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2016, 08:10 PM   #30
Monahan For Mayor
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Exp:
Default

Are the kings even that physical anymore ?
Monahan For Mayor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2016, 10:20 PM   #31
dustygoon
Franchise Player
 
dustygoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bay Area
Exp:
Default

Kings are flailing. Keep Kulak in for eff sakes. Give him confidence. I haven't lost my shinguard on this team in a long time, but Grossman would be such a DUMB decision ("cuz LA is big"). Just run a lineup out there that has confidence. GG is going to outsmart himself out of a job with this crap.
dustygoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2016, 10:26 PM   #32
bigrangy
Franchise Player
 
bigrangy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Exp:
Default

Relative to their team, Kulak has been one of the best players in the league so far this year. He couldn't be doing any better. He needs to be in the lineup.
__________________
Oliver Kylington is the greatest and best player in the world
bigrangy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2016, 11:28 PM   #33
The Fonz
Our Jessica Fletcher
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Exp:
Default

The Kings may still have size, but they sure aren't mean anymore.

Richards - gone
Lucic - gone
Brown - old
Nolan - healthy scratch
Regehr - gone
Mitchell - gone

Would be a strange move for Gulutzan to bench Kulak, in favor of Grossmann just for the sake of his physicality.
The Fonz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2016, 11:48 PM   #34
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Fonz View Post
Brown - old

That's definitely not true. Brown just turned 32 today (thought he seems older since this is his 14th year in the NHL). His offence has fallen off since the last lockout, but he still plays with an edge.

This season he seems a lot more fired up than he has been recently.
PepsiFree is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2016, 12:13 AM   #35
calgaryblood
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Hmmmmmmm
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree View Post
That's definitely not true. Brown just turned 32 today (thought he seems older since this is his 14th year in the NHL). His offence has fallen off since the last lockout, but he still plays with an edge.

This season he seems a lot more fired up than he has been recently.
That's probably the oldest 32 year old in the NHL. So much miles on his body and he's become kind of a parody in the NHL where all fans make fun of him. He's pretty much useless these days and hasn't surpassed 30 points since 2011.
calgaryblood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2016, 02:05 AM   #36
erikk3
Crash and Bang Winger
 
erikk3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Gibsons BC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgaryblood View Post
That's probably the oldest 32 year old in the NHL. So much miles on his body and he's become kind of a parody in the NHL where all fans make fun of him. He's pretty much useless these days and hasn't surpassed 30 points since 2011.
At least the Kings have him on a great contract
erikk3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2016, 06:14 AM   #37
Rick M.
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgaryblood View Post
That's probably the oldest 32 year old in the NHL. So much miles on his body and he's become kind of a parody in the NHL where all fans make fun of him. He's pretty much useless these days and hasn't surpassed 30 points since 2011.
Hopefully Gio will blow him up a few times for old times' sake.
Rick M. is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Rick M. For This Useful Post:
Old 11-05-2016, 06:25 AM   #38
1qqaaz
Franchise Player
 
1qqaaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Indiana
Exp:
Default

Speaking of LA players who are old for their age

Gaborik has sure fallen off a cliff these past few years. I bet he doesn't break 25 points this year.
1qqaaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2016, 08:55 AM   #39
The Professor
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Plus Grossmann was just fine the last time he got in the lineup. I prefer getting everyone on the roster regular games every now and then. Obviously Kulak deserves more frequent starts though.
The Professor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2016, 09:06 AM   #40
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I talked to Roger about this yesterday, my beef isn't with Grossman at all, or Grossman being in the lineup. For the most part I think Gultzan has been spot on with his roster moves and leaving forward lines together etc.

I just wonder what Brett Kulak looks like in January if he's given 30 games before then and not 8. Could be the top four this team needs for the push into February-April.
Bingo is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:08 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy