Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-01-2016, 01:30 PM   #21
Calgary4LIfe
Franchise Player
 
Calgary4LIfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GranteedEV View Post
From Gulutzan's comments, the plan is to play Grossmann against slow, heavy teams, Kulak against speedy teams, and Jokipakka against everyone else.

i don't think this is good for the Flames going forward or good for them in the short run either, but then there haven't been a ton of decisions by this management that I have been enamoured by. Just par for the course to mediocrity. Deryk "Top 4 Defenseman" Engelland needs his minutes after all.
I think the Flames need Deryk "Top 4 Defencemen" Engelland's minutes. You knock him at every turn, but I (and many others) seem to think he has been a steadying influence in the back end and playing good, reliable defensive hockey. I have been fine with him playing top 4 minutes - sure, he can improve his transition game, but he defends well and provides a nice physical presence on the backend.
Calgary4LIfe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2016, 10:52 PM   #22
DoubleK
Franchise Player
 
DoubleK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Seattle, WA/Scottsdale, AZ
Exp:
Default

Send him down and let him play, he needs the minutes to keep him fresh in case of an injury.

The 6 we have been playing lately are the 6 we need to ride.
DoubleK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2016, 07:19 AM   #23
saillias
Franchise Player
 
saillias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgary4LIfe View Post
I think the Flames need Deryk "Top 4 Defencemen" Engelland's minutes. You knock him at every turn, but I (and many others) seem to think he has been a steadying influence in the back end and playing good, reliable defensive hockey. I have been fine with him playing top 4 minutes - sure, he can improve his transition game, but he defends well and provides a nice physical presence on the backend.
Prior to the game last night, Engelland was leading the Flames defense in PK TOI with 36:08. The Flames had surrendered the second most PP goals in the league.

Doubt those stats have gotten any more flattering since last night.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by JobHopper View Post
The thing is, my posts, thoughts and insights may be my opinions but they're also quite factual.
saillias is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2016, 09:40 AM   #24
TheoFleury
Powerplay Quarterback
 
TheoFleury's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgary4LIfe View Post
I think the Flames need Deryk "Top 4 Defencemen" Engelland's minutes. You knock him at every turn, but I (and many others) seem to think he has been a steadying influence in the back end and playing good, reliable defensive hockey. I have been fine with him playing top 4 minutes - sure, he can improve his transition game, but he defends well and provides a nice physical presence on the backend.
He's a good #6, but he's not a top 4 on actual playoff team IMO. I realize he played in the top 4 in the 2015 playoffs (if you want to call Brodie lugging him around playing in the top 4), but no way do we make the playoffs in 2015 with him being a staple there all year.
TheoFleury is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to TheoFleury For This Useful Post:
Old 11-02-2016, 10:42 AM   #25
-TC-
Franchise Player
 
-TC-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Glastonbury
Exp:
Default

no, we should play him
__________________
TC

-TC- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2016, 11:02 AM   #26
kyuss275
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Send Wideman to pressbox and play Kulak on bottom pairing. If they are going to continue to put Wideman in ( i really don't see what he brings to the team) then send Kulak down.
kyuss275 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to kyuss275 For This Useful Post:
Old 11-02-2016, 11:29 AM   #27
saillias
Franchise Player
 
saillias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kyuss275 View Post
Send Wideman to pressbox and play Kulak on bottom pairing. If they are going to continue to put Wideman in ( i really don't see what he brings to the team) then send Kulak down.
We're the most penalized team in the league since the incident, that's what he brings
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by JobHopper View Post
The thing is, my posts, thoughts and insights may be my opinions but they're also quite factual.
saillias is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2016, 11:38 AM   #28
FBI
Franchise Player
 
FBI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Flames fan in Seattle
Exp:
Default

I don't understand why Engelland is a staple on our PK... His IQ isn't good enough, he reacts late to the puck movement around the PP..
__________________
FBI is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to FBI For This Useful Post:
Old 11-02-2016, 11:40 AM   #29
kyuss275
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by saillias View Post
We're the most penalized team in the league since the incident, that's what he brings
Meh. I think it might have had something to do with it last year, but i don't believe it has anything to do with it this year.
kyuss275 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2016, 11:52 PM   #30
Samonadreau
Franchise Player
 
Samonadreau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Paradise
Exp:
Default

Time to play Kulak again. Wideman out.

Gio-Brodie
Kevin/Kulak-Hamilton
Kulak/Kevin-Engelland

Do it up Buttercup.
Samonadreau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2016, 12:23 AM   #31
DoubleK
Franchise Player
 
DoubleK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Seattle, WA/Scottsdale, AZ
Exp:
Default

I'd play Kulak over Gio right now.
DoubleK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2016, 11:36 AM   #32
Robbob
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

Missed the beginning of the season as I was overseas. Was Kulak put on waivers and currently in that 30 day window to send him down?
Robbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2016, 11:40 AM   #33
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbob View Post
Missed the beginning of the season as I was overseas. Was Kulak put on waivers and currently in that 30 day window to send him down?
Kulak is exempt from waivers this year unless he plays 148 games (which is impossible). Flames can send him down whenever they want.

He would have to clear waivers next season.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 11-03-2016, 11:42 AM   #34
Robbob
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

Thanks for that info. It feels like he has been around forever. I guess it was all those injuries that didn't get him to the threshold for game and such.
Robbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2016, 02:29 PM   #35
genetic_phreek
First Line Centre
 
genetic_phreek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: VanCity
Exp:
icon57

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samonadreau View Post
Time to play Kulak again. Wideman out.

Gio-Brodie
Kevin/Kulak-Hamilton
Kulak/Kevin-Engelland

Do it up Buttercup.
looks like buttercup has listened to your request.
genetic_phreek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2016, 02:30 PM   #36
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DoubleK View Post
I'd play Kulak over Gio right now.
come on now...if Kulak had those minutes you would be seeing glaring errors from him too
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dino7c For This Useful Post:
Old 11-03-2016, 07:20 PM   #37
jayswin
Celebrated Square Root Day
 
jayswin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Kulak is exempt from waivers this year unless he plays 148 games (which is impossible).
Says who?
jayswin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2016, 07:53 PM   #38
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jayswin View Post
Says who?
Umm... 71 regular season games left + 28 max playoff games = 99 games left this season to lose his waiver exempt status which he loses next season anyways.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2016, 07:55 PM   #39
jayswin
Celebrated Square Root Day
 
jayswin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Haha, maybe that meme is smaller than I thought it was. I thought it was everywhere.

jayswin is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jayswin For This Useful Post:
Old 11-04-2016, 11:18 AM   #40
calgaryblood
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Hmmmmmmm
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
come on now...if Kulak had those minutes you would be seeing glaring errors from him too
Says who?
calgaryblood is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:54 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy