10-29-2016, 08:58 AM
|
#21
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
One of the few flames who drives the net consistently and has hands to finish. Doesn't look out of place at all. Size and strength aren't an issue. Speed isn't an issue.
I know he only has 3 points but the more he plays and learns the big game, points will come.
Gotta keep him or Flames leave a big hole on the left wing.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to goflamesgo18 For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-29-2016, 08:58 AM
|
#22
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: DeWinton
|
If he did stay up could the Flames still lend him out for the World Jr tourney?
|
|
|
10-29-2016, 08:59 AM
|
#23
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: CGY
|
This forum can be so bipolar. Last week he was too good to send down and this week after sitting for 2 games he cant cut it and should go down.
I don't know for sure if he should go down or stay up but will be more than okay with either choice. I think his development can be increased from both
|
|
|
10-29-2016, 09:05 AM
|
#24
|
Could Care Less
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shotinthebacklund
This forum can be so bipolar. Last week he was too good to send down and this week after sitting for 2 games he cant cut it and should go down.
I don't know for sure if he should go down or stay up but will be more than okay with either choice. I think his development can be increased from both
|
People have different opinions. The horror.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to heep223 For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-29-2016, 09:05 AM
|
#25
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
|
having watched Stockton, keep Tkachuk in the NHL at least for a while.
The only viable replacement for him is Jankowski and the Flames are not likely wanting to move him to the wing in the NHL.
__________________
Fireside Chat - The #1 Flames Fan Podcast - FiresideChat.ca
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Caged Great For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-29-2016, 09:05 AM
|
#26
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CedarMeter
If he did stay up could the Flames still lend him out for the World Jr tourney?
|
Yes.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Finger Cookin For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-29-2016, 09:07 AM
|
#27
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bay Area
|
Given size of 2nd contracts I would rather burn a year. He is going to be cheaper to sign long term after two years vs three. And power forwards develop slower. It's the 40 game mark that is key anyway.
__________________
.
"Fun must be always!" - Tomas Hertl
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to dustygoon For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-29-2016, 09:08 AM
|
#28
|
Backup Goalie
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Calgary
Exp:  
|
If he goes down we don't burn a year of his entry level contract and would not need to be protected for the expansion draft allowing somebody else to be protected.
Plus I don't want us to become Edmonton 2.0 where every first round pick makes the big club right out the gate. He's not playing exceptional therefore he needs to go down. I look forward to him progressing and showing what he can do next year.
Last edited by It's a great day 4 hockey; 10-29-2016 at 09:11 AM.
|
|
|
10-29-2016, 09:10 AM
|
#29
|
Franchise Player
|
Tkachuk doesn't have to be protected for the expansion draft at all, regardless of whether he's returned to junior or not.
|
|
|
10-29-2016, 09:13 AM
|
#30
|
Backup Goalie
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Calgary
Exp:  
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finger Cookin
Tkachuk doesn't have to be protected for the expansion draft at all, regardless of whether he's returned to junior or not.
|
Thanks for the insight. I still think he should go down for the other reasons I've mentioned though.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to It's a great day 4 hockey For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-29-2016, 09:13 AM
|
#31
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: CGY
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by heep223
People have different opinions. The horror.
|
You miss understand me heep, im not inditing those who have a different opinion. I just think at times we judge too much on the soup de jour rather than the whole menu.
|
|
|
10-29-2016, 09:14 AM
|
#32
|
Franchise Player
|
Last night on the radio broadcast both wills and lubo felt he has done enough to to stay.
I am not sure what the angry old guy who calls into overtime thinks
__________________
If I do not come back avenge my death
|
|
|
10-29-2016, 09:16 AM
|
#33
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
I bet they keep him to 39 games. Teams just don't seem to care about the 10 games as much.
|
|
|
10-29-2016, 09:20 AM
|
#34
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
I think everyone agrees we can't wait to see Tkachuk a step faster and 10 lbs heavier. But it's not like he can only grow and get faster in junior.
His mental make-up is already Pro. He exhibits maturity and leadership beyond his years...he doesn't need to ride a bus for six months to learn these qualities.
I really do respect London as a great Jr. Franchise...but I think Tkachuk will get more development out of NHL practises, diet and weight training.
And for anyone freaking 'We're the Oilers '. ..our 2012 first rounder is still developing in the A. Players deveop differently and non-linear. The Flames brass will make the right call.
|
|
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to JohnnyTitan For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-29-2016, 09:26 AM
|
#35
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Caged Great
having watched Stockton, keep Tkachuk in the NHL at least for a while.
The only viable replacement for him is Jankowski and the Flames are not likely wanting to move him to the wing in the NHL.
|
Shinkaruk putting up a few points. Is he not an option? Is Poirier doing anything?
|
|
|
10-29-2016, 09:28 AM
|
#36
|
Franchise Player
|
Treliving preaches taking time with prospects. While Tkachuk hasn't looked totally out of place he hasn't made the case that he's ready either. I think he goes back.
|
|
|
10-29-2016, 09:36 AM
|
#37
|
Franchise Player
|
He is on the bubble. If the flames are wanting to make a decision by 9th game then the next 2 are huge for him. I'm not sure the 9th game is the end all game , i think the 40th game, RfA decision, is the big one.
If they do send him down after the 9th game , flames are on the road in the Stockton area in that time. I do wonder who they would bring up if he goes down? Do they bring up a prospect to play top 9? Do they bring up Bollig to the pressbox and let Hamilton come in on 4th line? I would presume that Ferland or Bouma would play with Backlund line if this is the case.
|
|
|
10-29-2016, 09:39 AM
|
#38
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
|
I wish it were possible for an NHL team to pay the junior team to relinquish their rights so Tkachuk could go to the AHL instead.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to PepsiFree For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-29-2016, 09:41 AM
|
#40
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Flames fan in Seattle
|
Please God no Bollig if we send him down.
I might be in the minority but I think Chucky should stay past the 9 games.
__________________
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:40 PM.
|
|