View Poll Results: Your order?
|
Monahan Bennett Tkachuk
|
  
|
65 |
20.12% |
Monahan Tkachuk Bennett
|
  
|
21 |
6.50% |
Bennett Monahan Tkachuk
|
  
|
136 |
42.11% |
Bennett Tkachuk Monahan
|
  
|
86 |
26.63% |
Tkachuk Monahan Bennett
|
  
|
10 |
3.10% |
Tkachuk Bennett Monahan
|
  
|
5 |
1.55% |
08-03-2016, 12:14 PM
|
#21
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: The Armpit of BC: Trail
|
bmt
__________________
Disregard any and all THANKS I give. I'm a dirty, dirty thanks-whore.
|
|
|
08-03-2016, 12:15 PM
|
#22
|
Crash and Bang Winger
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Houston, TX
|
Bennett
One of the four players hyped as potential 1 overall. (THN had all 4 on the cover of the draft preview.)
Monahan
Potential 1st line centre. Compared to Toews.
Tkachuk
Not a center.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TX_Flame For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-03-2016, 12:16 PM
|
#23
|
Self-Suspension
|
1. Monahan
2. Bennett
3. Tkachuk
Bennett is a great player but he's reckless with a smaller frame. He will not stand up to the big western division teams over time as well as Monahan who may top out at 215-220. Sean has a Getzlaf like stature but has better offense.
I'd take the more durable slightly less dynamic workhorse over Bennett's more flashy play. Not to knock Bennett but Monahan's the #1 we needed for a decade
|
|
|
08-03-2016, 12:18 PM
|
#24
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrownDrake
I like Tkachuk but no way he goes ahead of a big center man.
Monahan was ranked 3rd overall behind only Jones and Mackinnon in prelim rankings by McKenzie, The Next Ones and the Hockey Writers, probably many others as well. He was older and not putting up a lot of points playing on a weak team with no line mates in his draft year. After 3 years its looks like many of those rankings were the correct ones not the final consensus rankings. Fell in his draft year for the wrong reasons to flashier players that were not as over scouted.
Kids a helluva player. Can't argue with 3 years of NHL stats either, in many re-drafts in a good draft class he probably goes anywhere from #1 to #3 easily. Mackinnon had almost 2 PPG and better speed but never was the all round player Monahan was in his draft year. Played with Drouin when Monahan played with Dante Salituro on a poorer team.
We got uber lucky getting him at 6
|
Both Laine and Pul went ahead of big centremen. You got BPA, then determine positions. And I believe the position order is defense/centre, winger and then goalie.
Monahan's performance is irrelevant. He's playing beside one the most dynamic wingers in the game right now, who also propped up Bill Arnold and Kevin Hayes. Put Monahan along side Frolik and Colborne and I bet Monahan isn't redrafted higher than 3rd. He's not a game changer who can score or generate offense on his own will. Of Bennett, Monahan, and Tkachuk, only Bennett is the kind of player who can generate regardless of his linemates.
|
|
|
08-03-2016, 12:23 PM
|
#25
|
First Line Centre
|
You guys are letting his NHL production cloud your memory. I was bored and looked at a bunch of mock drafts. No one had Monahan higher than 5th and more than a few had him at 8 or 9.
Lowest anyone had Bennett was 4th. Majority had him in the top 3. Not even close in my opinion and no ideahow Monahan could be ahead
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to DJones For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-03-2016, 12:29 PM
|
#26
|
Franchise Player
|
Tkachuk, Bennett, Monahan
Tkachuk was a top line player on the USA u-20 WJC team... Monahan was not on the team or even the u-18 team. Bennett was on the U-18 team his draft year.
Tkachuks 40 pts in 18 playoff games and +23 would be enough to put him above Bennett.
There are 20-30 #1C in the league and maybe 5 legit power forwards.
I don't pretend to think that Tkachuk will be as good a under 23 year old player in the NHL as Monahan, but neither will Bennett.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to ricardodw For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-03-2016, 12:43 PM
|
#27
|
Crash and Bang Winger
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJones
You guys are letting his NHL production cloud your memory. I was bored and looked at a bunch of mock drafts. No one had Monahan higher than 5th and more than a few had him at 8 or 9.
Lowest anyone had Bennett was 4th. Majority had him in the top 3. Not even close in my opinion and no ideahow Monahan could be ahead
|
Monahan was ranked 3rd by many articles 9 months before the draft. If they always got it correct I guess Getzlaf wouldn't have gone 19th and Perry 28th. ISS had Getzlaf at 10 and Brown at 9. I believe Monahan fell because he was older, put up less points on a poor team and wasn't flashy.
I likely take Bennett over Monahan because he is flashier and probably more of a game breaker, both were the #1 OHL ranked prospects in their draft year immediately before the draft.
If Monahan was born 2 months earlier after putting up 78 points in his rookie WHL season he goes top 3 if not 1st overall in 2012.
|
|
|
08-03-2016, 12:49 PM
|
#28
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrownDrake
Monahan was ranked 3rd by many articles 9 months before the draft. If they always got it correct I guess Getzlaf wouldn't have gone 19th and Perry 28th. ISS had Getzlaf at 10 and Brown at 9. I believe Monahan fell because he was older, put up less points on a poor team and wasn't flashy.
I likely take Bennett over Monahan because he is flashier and probably more of a game breaker, both were the #1 OHL ranked prospects in their draft year immediately before the draft.
If Monahan was born 2 months earlier after putting up 78 points in his rookie WHL season he goes top 3 if not 1st overall in 2012.
|
I don't see it. I was very happy to get Monahan at #6 but it didn't feel like half the steal as Bennett at #4
Last edited by DJones; 08-03-2016 at 01:02 PM.
|
|
|
08-03-2016, 12:51 PM
|
#29
|
Acerbic Cyberbully
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw
Tkachuk, Bennett, Monahan
Tkachuk was a top line player on the USA u-20 WJC team... Monahan was not on the team or even the u-18 team. Bennett was on the U-18 team his draft year...
|
I can see the temptation in ranking Tkachuk ahead of both Monahan and Bennett, but I would tend to fall in line with those who think that high-end scoring centres are dramatically more valuable than wingers over all. At any rate, I think all three players are very close in terms of how they rank in their draft years.
I do think you are setting too much emphasis on the int'l tournaments, which are short, and very frequently not reflective of players' abilities relative to their contemporaries for a variety of reasons. Moreover, I think the value of power forwards in today's NHL is inflated by the fact that there are not many of them. Milan Lucic is presently the prototypical example of this sort of player, and his contribution to team success in the past few seasons is legitimately an open question.
1. Bennett
2. Monahan
3. Tkachuk
I should like to reiterate that the gap between all of them is very slim.
|
|
|
08-03-2016, 12:53 PM
|
#30
|
Acerbic Cyberbully
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AcGold
1. Monahan
2. Bennett
3. Tkachuk
Bennett is a great player but he's reckless with a smaller frame. He will not stand up to the big western division teams over time as well as Monahan who may top out at 215-220. Sean has a Getzlaf like stature but has better offense.
I'd take the more durable slightly less dynamic workhorse over Bennett's more flashy play. Not to knock Bennett but Monahan's the #1 we needed for a decade
|
This is an exaggerated concern.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Textcritic For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-03-2016, 12:56 PM
|
#31
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
I love Monahan and while he's a very skilled player, he's not what I would call an overly gifted player. He's very solid and has good hands around the net but the rest of his game is more good than great. I see Bennett and Tkachuk as being more gifted players with higher ultimate upside. It remains to be seen if either player reaches their potential but if we are going back to them in their draft years I don't think it's really much of a contest that Monahan would be 3rd out of the three.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Erick Estrada For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-03-2016, 01:00 PM
|
#32
|
Franchise Player
|
1. Monahan
2. Bennett
3. Tkachuk
Monahan's draft year was so very deep, looking at where he was drafted it misleading. He easily would have been in the conversation for 1st overall had he been born a year later.
|
|
|
08-03-2016, 01:08 PM
|
#33
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
|
1) Bennett. There was a reason as a prospect he was considered a Toews-type talent and then some. Some thought he was the best player in his draft class. Now in 2013 he might have gone after Drouin/MacKinnon/Barkov/Jones, but he would never have gone after Elias Lindholm or been in discussion against Darnell Nurse. Probably goes 4th before Dubois or Juolevi, or even 3rd before Puljujarvi as Dubois did. I honestly still prefer him over Reinhart and Draisaitl too by a slim margin.
2) Monahan. Draft year stats were deflated playing on a weak team. Was considered a good candidate for a good, sure fire #2 centre if not a franchise centre. Probably goes after Ekblad/Reinhart/Draisaitl/Bennett, but before Dal Colle. Probably goes after Dubois, but before Juolevi.
3) Tkachuk. Winger, inflated stats playing with Marner and Juolevi and Matthews, but a strong complimentary piece. Might still have gone after Nurse and Ristolainen, but probably goes before Nichushkin. Probably goes after Ekblad/Reinhart/Draisaitl/Bennett, but before Dal Colle.
Draft order the past four drafts possibly goes something like:
McDavid
Eichel
Matthews
Laine
Ekblad
MacKinnon
Barkov
Puljujarvi
Jones
Drouin
Reinhart
Bennett
Dubois
Draisaitl
Strome
Marner
Monahan
Tkachuk
Ristolainen
Provorov
Keller
Sergachyev
Hanifin
Werenski
Juolevi
Lindholm
Dal Colle
W. Nylander
Ehlers
A. Nylander
Nichushkin
Nurse
Zacha
With guys like Larkin, Brown, Connor, Boeser, Sanheim, and Rantanen being some wild cards teams were high on before their drafts.
Last edited by GranteedEV; 08-03-2016 at 02:47 PM.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to GranteedEV For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-03-2016, 01:17 PM
|
#34
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Calgary
|
1. Bennett
2. Tkachuk
3. Monahan
Bennett was in the running for #1 in his class. I think a step up on both Tkachuk and Monahan in that regard. I have Tkachuk #2, just ahead of Monahan because I think we are overvaluing Monahan slightly because of hindsight in how well he has played so early. Back in his draft year, lots wanted Lindholm and many had doubts as to his pure skill and upside.
__________________
From HFBoard oiler fan, in analyzing MacT's management:
O.K. there has been a lot of talk on whether or not MacTavish has actually done a good job for us, most fans on this board are very basic in their analysis and I feel would change their opinion entirely if the team was successful.
|
|
|
08-03-2016, 01:24 PM
|
#35
|
First Line Centre
|
Binnit
Monohan
Katchuk
|
|
|
08-03-2016, 01:27 PM
|
#36
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by puckedoff
Binnit
Monohan
Katchuk
|
Or...
Benzo
Mono
Taco
...I'll show myself out.
__________________
From HFBoard oiler fan, in analyzing MacT's management:
O.K. there has been a lot of talk on whether or not MacTavish has actually done a good job for us, most fans on this board are very basic in their analysis and I feel would change their opinion entirely if the team was successful.
|
|
|
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Fighting Banana Slug For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-03-2016, 01:28 PM
|
#37
|
Scoring Winger
|
All three are good but Bennett seems to be more dynamic, with a game-breaking ability. I've never seen Monahan dominate a shift by himself the way Bennett has. I'd put a big C like Monahan over Tkachuk as well.
|
|
|
08-03-2016, 01:38 PM
|
#38
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJones
Consensus ranking for Monahan was 7th. Bennett was a candidate for #1.
|
This simply isn't true. The 2013 had a consensus top 4, in some particular order, then a tier that included Monahan, Lindholm, Nurse etc. with a wildcard Nichushkin but usually preference given to the centers. Monahan rarely found his way outside of the top 6, certainly wasn't a consensus number 7.
Bennett was certainly more of a consensus number 4 than Monahan was a number 7. Bennett's draft year was also quite a bit weaker than Monahan's. Not nearly as hyped. That said, I would still put Bennett ahead of Monahan in their pre-draft rankings but Monahan has shot up a lot while Bennett hasn't.
|
|
|
08-03-2016, 01:51 PM
|
#39
|
Crash and Bang Winger
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: The Netherlands
|
The poll asked for "Your" order; so I went MBT.
Had the poll asked for the order you think they'd go in this scenario, I'd have selected BMT.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oil Stain
There is no pressure on the Oilers to improve quickly
|
|
|
|
08-03-2016, 01:54 PM
|
#40
|
Franchise Player
|
Bennett by a fair margin.
Monahan and Tkachuk would be pretty close and could go either way but I think Monahan would rank higher on most lists if for no other reason than being a big centreman.
Ricardodw: Monahan was the last cut for the WJC as a 17 year old, in a year where they had two others make it (MacKinnon and Drouin), despite the fact that 17 year olds were rarely being selected back then.
Bennett of course never got the chance.
And making the US team is a completely different kettle of fish. Every one of these guys would be a top line player on the US team.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:49 PM.
|
|