Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-03-2016, 08:47 PM   #21
Calgary4LIfe
Franchise Player
 
Calgary4LIfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Exp:
Default

Trade for a 6'5" Colborne.
Sign Engelland - a black and blue player that can actually play.
Traded for Bollig.
Brought up Ferland and kept him up.
Drafted Hunter Smith.
Signed Keegan Kanzig a bit early to some people.
Signed 6'3" Derek Grant
Traded for 6'5" Hamilton
Traded 5'10" Russell and got back 6'3" more physical Jokipakka
Signed 6'2" Nakladal who is decently physical for a puck mover
Signed Garnet Hathaway
Traded for Ladislav Smid

I guess people see what they want to see.

edit:
Also
Signed 6'3" Van Brabant
Traded for 6'3" Drew Shore
Traded for 6'3" Keven Pollack
Signed Colton Orr to the farm
Signed Blair Riley to the farm

The Flames got substantially bigger once Burke arrived, and it has continued under Treliving.

Last edited by Calgary4LIfe; 05-03-2016 at 08:52 PM.
Calgary4LIfe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2016, 08:49 PM   #22
blender
First Line Centre
 
blender's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Kamloops
Exp:
Default

Doughty, Kopitar, Carter, Toffoli, Gaborik. Getzlaf, Perry, Lindholm, Silfverberg. Thornton, Pavelski, Couture, Burns, Vlasic, Marleau. Who says you can't have skill?
blender is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2016, 08:52 PM   #23
Da_Chief
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by the_only_turek_fan View Post
All talk. Their actions contradict their rhetoric.

Re-sign Stajan
Sign Raymond
Re-sign Russell
Trade for Shinkaruk
Re-sign Backlund
Sign Frolik

Now I like Backs and Frolik, and the Shinkaruk trade was for nothing, but there is no evidence that backs up their rhetoric so far.

MF and MB are good players and I don't want to move them, but I hate it when they talk about black and blue hockey and truculence when there actions contradict their statements.
Flames re-signed Russell?

A lot of teams would like to have 12 6'5" Power forwards and 6 Puck Moving 6'5" dman. There are only a handful of this kind of players. No one is tradnig them away, thats why Ferland probably has decent value. Look at the contract David Clarkson got. You want a team full of McGrattans?

It's a process, not going to happen overnight.
Da_Chief is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Da_Chief For This Useful Post:
Old 05-03-2016, 08:54 PM   #24
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blender View Post
Doughty, Kopitar, Carter, Toffoli, Gaborik. Getzlaf, Perry, Lindholm, Silfverberg. Thornton, Pavelski, Couture, Burns, Vlasic, Marleau. Who says you can't have skill?
I don't think anybody says you can't, just that it takes time and patience to acquire players like that, and in most cases you either draft/develop them on your own, or pay through the teeth to acquire them.
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2016, 08:56 PM   #25
blender
First Line Centre
 
blender's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Kamloops
Exp:
Default

Well, it sounds like a lot if posters in this thread are saying it.
Flames have the players with skill. Just need the supporting cast and ethic.

Sent from my SM-G900W8 using Tapatalk
blender is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2016, 08:56 PM   #26
FiveSeven
Powerplay Quarterback
 
FiveSeven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Holland
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgary4LIfe View Post
Trade for a 6'5" Colborne.
Sign Engelland - a black and blue player that can actually play.
Traded for Bollig.
Brought up Ferland and kept him up.
Drafted Hunter Smith.
Signed Keegan Kanzig a bit early to some people.
Signed 6'3" Derek Grant
Traded for 6'5" Hamilton
Traded 5'10" Russell and got back 6'3" more physical Jokipakka
Signed 6'2" Nakladal who is decently physical for a puck mover
Signed Garnet Hathaway
Traded for Ladislav Smid

I guess people see what they want to see.
Exactly. They can't just wave a wand and make people grow.
You can't make players sign here.
You can't just made trades happen.

You take the best available option, you don't go long term as to not impair future choices that align more with the overall vision, and you live.
Everything done by Treliving has been a carefully well thought out plan. Sometimes things don't work, so is life.
The majority of things did workout, and better options are becoming available. Better options will result in better results personnel wise.
FiveSeven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2016, 08:59 PM   #27
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

I look forward to a team that a) plays more physically, and b) stands up for each other.

And that doesn't just mean bigger, meaner players, it also means a different coaching philosophy and demanding a grittier style of play.

I have absolutely no doubt that whoever they hire as the new coach will not tolerate a lack of response and sticking up for each other.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Old 05-03-2016, 09:01 PM   #28
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Calgary4Life clarified the moves to add size nicely.

Did anybody hear that Burke interview with McCown where he suggested that they had some truculent players that Hartley didn't like playing?

http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/b...ack-blue-team/

I wonder who in particular he was talking about? Maybe they wanted Engelland to see more ice time? Maybe Jooris? Maybe Hathaway? Hard to know.

Last edited by Flames Draft Watcher; 05-03-2016 at 09:08 PM.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2016, 09:03 PM   #29
DomeFoam
Scoring Winger
 
DomeFoam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Kelowna
Exp:
Default

If this is the direction they want to head in, Tkachuk is our guy. No he wont be the crowd pleasing goal scoring dangling Nylander, but he fits the bill of what style of hockey they are trying to accomplish. And im fine with it, we have the generational skill in Gaudreau, the 2 way genius is Monahan, and a bit of both in Bennett, time to fill the last need which is that gritty Brayden Schenn-like winger for our top six.
DomeFoam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2016, 09:04 PM   #30
Dion
Not a casual user
 
Dion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: A simple man leading a complicated life....
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GranteedEV View Post
Th Sharks don't play a physical style at all. they play a speed/skill game more like the Star/Preds/Hawks.
They also have the size that doesn't allow other teams to push them around. The Flames forwards as a whole are too small and need to get bigger.
__________________
Dion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2016, 09:06 PM   #31
JonDuke
Franchise Player
 
JonDuke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

JonDuke is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to JonDuke For This Useful Post:
Old 05-03-2016, 09:09 PM   #32
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by the_only_turek_fan View Post
All talk. Their actions contradict their rhetoric.

Re-sign Stajan
Sign Raymond
Re-sign Russell
Trade for Shinkaruk
Re-sign Backlund
Sign Frolik

Now I like Backs and Frolik, and the Shinkaruk trade was for nothing, but there is no evidence that backs up their rhetoric so far.

MF and MB are good players and I don't want to move them, but I hate it when they talk about black and blue hockey and truculence when there actions contradict their statements.
Good point. I hope their plan isn't to smash square pegs into round holes. Might as well hire Brent Sutter or Greg Gilbert to coach them.

In theory sure, I would love a black and blue team but we are so far from having that. You also need the PK to back it up.

Treliving was a goon so it isn't a surprise, but he has his work cut out for him. I have to think Dubois or Tkachuk are his draft targets this year.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2016, 09:09 PM   #33
TheScorpion
First round-bust
 
TheScorpion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: speculating about AHL players
Exp:
Default

Management wants to make the Flames black and blue? I smell a jersey redesign!

__________________
Need a great deal on a new or pre-owned car? Come see me at Platinum Mitsubishi — 2720 Barlow Trail NE

TheScorpion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2016, 09:09 PM   #34
David Struch
First Line Centre
 
David Struch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
icon57 Line-up with Dubois/Tkachuk:

Flames need to pay the price and move up to grab their man... (*if necessary)

Gaudreau - Monahan - Shinkaruk
Dubois/Tkachuk - Bennett - Ferland
Colborne - Backlund - Frolik
Bouma - Jooris - Hathaway
Agostino/Van Brabant

Giordano - Hamitlon
Jokipakka - Brodie
Wotherpsoon - Sieloff
Engelland

Last edited by David Struch; 05-04-2016 at 08:39 AM.
David Struch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2016, 09:12 PM   #35
Dion
Not a casual user
 
Dion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: A simple man leading a complicated life....
Exp:
Default

__________________
Dion is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dion For This Useful Post:
Old 05-03-2016, 09:15 PM   #36
Matty81
Franchise Player
 
Matty81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Exp:
Default

Yeah it sounds like a blueprint totally different to what they currently have. I don't think they really have one forward who could be called a power forward.. maybe Ferland? And the D is mobile and not very physical at all, at least in terms of the long term commitments.

I think that kind of blueprint is outdated anyway. Puck possession matters but size and physicality are just nice to have. If a player can protect the puck and do good things with it, it doesn't matter if he's 5'6" or 6'6" with fighting disappearing.
Matty81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2016, 09:15 PM   #37
heep223
Could Care Less
 
heep223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default

This is the thing I hate about Burke. "You need both skill and size in your lineup." Thanks tips.

And for some reason people treat it as some sort of epiphany when they hear him say that.
heep223 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to heep223 For This Useful Post:
Old 05-03-2016, 09:17 PM   #38
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by heep223 View Post
This is the thing I hate about Burke. "You need both skill and size in your lineup." Thanks tips.

And for some reason people treat it as some sort of epiphany when they hear him say that.
Nope. Just glad to hear that the guys in charge agree.

Compared to Feaster, for example, who made the team substantially smaller, as well as hiring a coach who all but eliminated hitting.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Old 05-03-2016, 09:34 PM   #39
St. Pats
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

You watch them in their own zone and they get pinned in far too often. Seem powerless to turn the puck over. Of course they aren't really trying because Hartley knew they didn't have the bodies to do so. So they just sit looking to block shots and giving up the boards. Meanwhile they leave players in front of the net so their goalie is screened and rebounds are knocked in. Far far too passive.

Amplified on the PK.

On offense they dump and chase again with bodies who can't reclaim the puck. Little wonder they never have the puck.

They need not only some bodies that can play a different style but a coach who will teach them to play completely different than they have.

A pretty tall order.

All this with a collection of crap goaltenders to back them up while they learn.

Somebody better have a busy offseason.
St. Pats is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to St. Pats For This Useful Post:
Old 05-03-2016, 09:34 PM   #40
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

I don't think Feaster planned to make the team small. He went for the BPAs who just happened to be smaller skilled guys and then Hartley played the cards he was dealt.

Every GM would love to have big skilled bruisers, but they are rare and aren't easy to acquire.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."

Last edited by FlamesAddiction; 05-03-2016 at 09:46 PM.
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:16 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy