Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Which type of player would you rather add to the flames?
A 60 point big defensivly solid rh shot rw 19 5.08%
A stud .920+ save % goalie 355 94.92%
Voters: 374. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-19-2016, 01:25 PM   #21
Strange Brew
Franchise Player
 
Strange Brew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

We need to see how this team plays I front of a good goalie.

Just like a great goalie can hide a team's weaknesses, seems like horrid goaltending can also obscure other needs.
Strange Brew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2016, 01:40 PM   #22
Leeman4Gilmour
First Line Centre
 
Leeman4Gilmour's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Normally, my desk
Exp:
Default

10th in shots against
30th in goals allowed.

I stayed with the grain and went with the majority on this one
Leeman4Gilmour is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Leeman4Gilmour For This Useful Post:
Old 04-19-2016, 02:22 PM   #23
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

A stud goalie gets this team to the playoffs. Another top 6 forward won't. We do need both though to take the next step to being a contender
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Vinny01 For This Useful Post:
Old 04-19-2016, 02:28 PM   #24
flambers
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

A goalie I would think is the number 1 priority in the off season.

If the teams does not upgrade the goalie position I doubt an upgrade at right wing would improve the Flames enough to allow them to contend for a playoff spot.
flambers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2016, 02:34 PM   #25
goodyear
Scoring Winger
 
goodyear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Ya why not both?

I don't know if Treliving can pull it off but how about Wayne Simmonds and Jaro Halak?

Simmonds is probably not on the market but Halak could be had if Greiss show enough in the playoffs for NYI???

/My2Cents
goodyear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2016, 03:01 PM   #26
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by goodyear View Post
Ya why not both?

I don't know if Treliving can pull it off but how about Wayne Simmonds and Jaro Halak?

Simmonds is probably not on the market but Halak could be had if Greiss show enough in the playoffs for NYI???

/My2Cents
My concern with Halak is health. A healthy Halak could be that guy but his injury track record is pretty bleak. If the Flames did land Halak we had better hope Ortio can fill the void as well as he did during the final stretch of this season. If not we're in trouble.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2016, 03:22 PM   #27
DJones
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

Scoring more goals won't help us if we don't have a goalie
DJones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2016, 03:25 PM   #28
Weitz
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Do the flames score as many goals if they don't allow as many?

Doubtful.

Hard to judge what would happen straight up with a better goalie because chances are they don't score as many goals due to score effects.
Weitz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2016, 03:26 PM   #29
MrMastodonFarm
Lifetime Suspension
 
MrMastodonFarm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Weitz View Post
Do the flames score as many goals if they don't allow as many?

Doubtful.
Deep.
MrMastodonFarm is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to MrMastodonFarm For This Useful Post:
Old 04-19-2016, 03:33 PM   #30
GranteedEV
Franchise Player
 
GranteedEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Adding a RW isn't just about adding offense, it's about improving offensive zone time and reducing all the BS deflection/screen goals the Flames leave their goalies out to dry for.

Give me prime Marian Hossa thanks.
__________________

"May those who accept their fate find happiness. May those who defy it find glory."
GranteedEV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2016, 03:54 PM   #31
saillias
Franchise Player
 
saillias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm View Post
Deep.


And, baseless conjecture that completely forgets 2014-2015.

Don't know why it's so hard for Oiler fans to accept that the Flames offence is fine
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by JobHopper View Post
The thing is, my posts, thoughts and insights may be my opinions but they're also quite factual.
saillias is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2016, 03:56 PM   #32
Weitz
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

nvm
Weitz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Weitz For This Useful Post:
Old 04-19-2016, 05:02 PM   #33
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw View Post
Did Dubnyk all of the sudden learn how to play goalie when he left Edmonton?
Counterpoint - Did the Minnesota Wild suddenly learn how to play defense once Dubnyk got there?

Darcy Kuemper had a .905 save percentage in his 31 GP.

Niklas Backstrom had a .887 in his 19 GP.

Dubnyk came in an immediately posted a .936 in his 39 GP.

So what was it - did Dubnyk suddenly learn to play goalie after Edmonton - or did Minnesota suddenly start to play better team defense once they got Dubnyk.

Answer was likely a bit of both. Dubnyk learned a lot in Arizona under Sean Burke (Dubnyk was poor in Nashville & Hamilton too before posting a .916 in Arizona) and then Minnesota played with a lot more confidence once they got some strong goaltending behind them.
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to SuperMatt18 For This Useful Post:
Old 04-20-2016, 01:35 PM   #34
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18 View Post
Counterpoint - Did the Minnesota Wild suddenly learn how to play defense once Dubnyk got there?

Darcy Kuemper had a .905 save percentage in his 31 GP.

Niklas Backstrom had a .887 in his 19 GP.

Dubnyk came in an immediately posted a .936 in his 39 GP.

So what was it - did Dubnyk suddenly learn to play goalie after Edmonton - or did Minnesota suddenly start to play better team defense once they got Dubnyk.

Answer was likely a bit of both. Dubnyk learned a lot in Arizona under Sean Burke (Dubnyk was poor in Nashville & Hamilton too before posting a .916 in Arizona) and then Minnesota played with a lot more confidence once they got some strong goaltending behind them.
Good post

Dubnyk joined the Wild 4 games before the all-star break.

The splits are broken by before and after all star break

Player-ppg before allstar - ppg after

Sutter .60 - .37
Parise .93 - .74
Pomminville - .88 - .44

The top-4 d Sutter-Brodin-Scandella-Spurgeon went from 1.38 ppg to 1.18 ppg after the all star game... More defense, less scoring, more winning.

The Wild's best players had their personal statistics negatively impacted by playing winning hockey in front of Dubnyk.

Was Sutter the best d-man in the league after the all star game? Certainly would have been in the top-3. He was putting in 28 minute a game and was a +15 on the winningest team in hockey.

For the year whole year he was 29 minutes /game and +7

He finished 9th in the Norris ... all the players in front of him had more points and a higher ppg. Had he continued to play losing hockey and ended up with 50 pts (like he did this year) he would have been higher in the Norris voting.

Would it be okay if the core Flames ppg dropped by 20% to bump the goalies sv% by .20 from .900 to .920?

On this board and in general everybody is pointing to the point totals of Gio-Brodie and Hamilton saying they had great seasons. Just on the overall standings (4 wins above the very worst team in the league) I find almost impossible that they all had career years.

Would Gaudreau and Monahan be looking at the 7 and 6 M contracts if they only had 64 and 50 pts and the Flames won 5-6 more games because they played harder defense and were +20 and +10 rather than +5 and -6

This year Sutter is back to 51 pts #9 in defense scoring from #32 the year before and will get more Norris votes . Dubnyks sv% is down to .919 from .938 and he will get no votes for the Hart. He finished 4th in the Hart voting last year.


PS. The Coach Yeo who got the Wild to buy in to the defense first system that turned them around last year apparently lost the room and got fired.

Last edited by ricardodw; 04-20-2016 at 01:43 PM.
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2016, 01:41 PM   #35
GranteedEV
Franchise Player
 
GranteedEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Ryan Sutter, nephew of Gary Sutter.
__________________

"May those who accept their fate find happiness. May those who defy it find glory."
GranteedEV is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GranteedEV For This Useful Post:
Old 04-20-2016, 02:11 PM   #36
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

There is potentially some truth to the Wild playing better defense after the trade, although it was quite minimal, and then playing worse team defense this season (Killer Central division may have played a difference too).

2014/2015 (Pre-Dubnyk) - 9.8 High Danger Scoring Chances Against Per Game
2014/2015 (Post - Dubnyk) - 9.4 High Danger Scoring Chances Against Per Game
2015/2016 (Whole Season) - 10.7 High Danger Scoring Chances against per Game

The Flames sit at 12.1 against per game so we are much worse in that regard, and hence tougher on our goalies.

Agree that it is unlikely that a .920 goalie would remain a .920 goalie on the Flames, the team defense needs to improve too. But even with all that being considered the Flames goalies still under performed though.

The 8 closest teams in terms of high danger scoring chances against per game (with save percentage also listed are):

NYI - 11.7 - .915
NYR- 11.8 - .914
WPG- 11.9 - .903
CGY - 12.1 - .892
DAL - 12.3 - .904
VAN - 12.6 - .905
EDM - 12.6 - .910
COL -12.8 - .909

So with stronger goaltending you would expect the Flames to be able to improve to something like a .910 save percentage, and with weak goaltending they should be somewhere in the same range as WPG's .903 save percentage.

Those are both still considerable better than the .892 that the Flames got this season.

Last edited by SuperMatt18; 04-20-2016 at 02:18 PM.
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to SuperMatt18 For This Useful Post:
Old 04-20-2016, 02:27 PM   #37
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18 View Post
There is potentially some truth to the Wild playing better defense after the trade, although it was quite minimal, and then playing worse team defense this season (Killer Central division may have played a difference too).

2014/2015 (Pre-Dubnyk) - 9.8 High Danger Scoring Chances Against Per Game
2014/2015 (Post - Dubnyk) - 9.4 High Danger Scoring Chances Against Per Game
2015/2016 (Whole Season) - 10.7 High Danger Scoring Chances against per Game

The Flames sit at 12.1 against per game so we are much worse in that regard, and hence tougher on our goalies.

Agree that it is unlikely that a .920 goalie would remain a .920 goalie on the Flames, the team defense needs to improve too. But even with all that being considered the Flames goalies still under performed though.

The 8 closest teams in terms of scoring chances against (with save percentage also listed are):

NYI - 11.7 - .915
NYR- 11.8 - .914
WPG- 11.9 - .903
CGY - 12.1 - .892
DAL - 12.3 - .904
VAN - 12.6 - .905
EDM - 12.6 - .910
COL -12.8 - .909

So with stronger goaltending you would expect the Flames to be able to improve to something like a .910 save percentage, and with weak goaltending they should be somewhere in the same range as WPG's .903 save percentage.

Those are both still considerable better than the .892 that the Flames got this season.
where do you get the high danger scoring chances stat?

What does it mean? Area of shots? re-positioning shots.. where the goalie has to reset .

Just from what you have shown it would look that the NYI defense with 3 of 4 defense first is nearly as bad as the Flames 0/4 defense first and that Halak/Griess are in fact stud goalies.

It would also be interesting if the Jets high danger shots were lower with Hellebuyck in goal or if he on the next top Goalie track with his 26 games .918 sv% behind a crappy defense team.

how did the Leafs do in the high danger scoring chances? in front of Reimer.
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2016, 02:43 PM   #38
GranteedEV
Franchise Player
 
GranteedEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18 View Post
There is potentially some truth to the Wild playing better defense after the trade, although it was quite minimal, and then playing worse team defense this season (Killer Central division may have played a difference too).

2014/2015 (Pre-Dubnyk) - 9.8 High Danger Scoring Chances Against Per Game
2014/2015 (Post - Dubnyk) - 9.4 High Danger Scoring Chances Against Per Game
2015/2016 (Whole Season) - 10.7 High Danger Scoring Chances against per Game

The Flames sit at 12.1 against per game so we are much worse in that regard, and hence tougher on our goalies.

Agree that it is unlikely that a .920 goalie would remain a .920 goalie on the Flames, the team defense needs to improve too. But even with all that being considered the Flames goalies still under performed though.

The 8 closest teams in terms of high danger scoring chances against per game (with save percentage also listed are):

NYI - 11.7 - .915
NYR- 11.8 - .914
WPG- 11.9 - .903
CGY - 12.1 - .892
DAL - 12.3 - .904
VAN - 12.6 - .905
EDM - 12.6 - .910
COL -12.8 - .909

So with stronger goaltending you would expect the Flames to be able to improve to something like a .910 save percentage, and with weak goaltending they should be somewhere in the same range as WPG's .903 save percentage.

Those are both still considerable better than the .892 that the Flames got this season.
I agree with this post, and this is why I'm not especially down on Karri Ramo and his .909 (.910 AdjSV%) or Ortio and his .902 (.906 AdjSV%) - improving in net would be nice but not priority one.

The single most important thing is getting our high danger chances against down to a range reasonable for an offensive team. Maybe not go full trap but cut it down to ~11 and get the scoring chances against down from 28.1 to ~26 - The key to that is the top line RW who can dominate his 16-20 minutes a game, rapid improvements from both Monahan and Bennett at center, and a more steady, solid #4D (Brian Campbell as a placeholder for Kylington, anyone?).

By the way, the departure of Kris Russell has seen them get worse in both of these stats, not better. Pre Feb 13, they were 28.0 /11.7 and post Feb 13 they were 28.3 / 13.0
__________________

"May those who accept their fate find happiness. May those who defy it find glory."

Last edited by GranteedEV; 04-20-2016 at 02:48 PM.
GranteedEV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2016, 02:53 PM   #39
JiriHrdina
I believe in the Pony Power
 
JiriHrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm View Post
Deep.
Derp?
JiriHrdina is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to JiriHrdina For This Useful Post:
Old 04-20-2016, 03:13 PM   #40
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

anyone with eyeballs who watched the Flames knows their save percentage has more to do with goal tending than anything else...are they perfect defensively? hell no but come on now the goal tending was horrible. Hiller was as bad as I have ever seen an NHLer play. If it was all on the Flames D you think another team might give him a sniff yet there is zero chance of that.
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to dino7c For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:03 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy