03-28-2016, 11:13 PM
|
#21
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Agree with Risto over Jones. Ristolainen has a mean streak along with his great skating and overall play.
|
|
|
03-28-2016, 11:16 PM
|
#22
|
I believe in the Pony Power
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monahan For Mayor
Because fancy stats.
|
Ha. You don't know me as a poster very well. I'm the last guy to refer to, or pay attention to, fancy stats. Not because I don't believe they have value - but because I would rather watch the players and assess from that basis.
|
|
|
03-28-2016, 11:23 PM
|
#23
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiriHrdina
Ha. You don't know me as a poster very well. I'm the last guy to refer to, or pay attention to, fancy stats. Not because I don't believe they have value - but because I would rather watch the players and assess from that basis.
|
I wasn't actually meaning that directly at you. Just in general that's the argument.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Monahan For Mayor For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-28-2016, 11:25 PM
|
#24
|
Franchise Player
|
Klimchuk one of only 3 picks in the first round who has yet to see an NHL game.
__________________
"OOOOOOHHHHHHH those Russians" - Boney M
|
|
|
03-28-2016, 11:26 PM
|
#25
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Yen Man
I'd take Ristolainen over Jones, guy is going to be a stud. Jones is a bit overrated IMO. I think Barkov / Mackinnon / Monahan are pretty close, they are probably interchangeable in the top 3 depending on preference.
|
that top 5 is going to be one the best top 5 in the decade.
__________________
"OOOOOOHHHHHHH those Russians" - Boney M
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to killer_carlson For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-28-2016, 11:28 PM
|
#26
|
Franchise Player
|
I've been saying since the end of his rookie year that Monahan has a 50-goal season in him.
Nothing has changed. Dude is a stone cold killer around the net.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to GreenLantern2814 For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-28-2016, 11:30 PM
|
#27
|
Franchise Player
|
So far I think each has had a pretty decisive year.
Rookie - MacKinnon
Sophomore - Monahan
Third year - Barkov
It's quite clear that MacKinnon has the tools to succeed, especially with his skating, but this is his second (relatively speaking) underwhelming season offensively. I still think he has the most potential of the draft class, but I feel like he's been the most inconsistent and might have the lowest floor of these guys as well.
Barkov, excluding the injuries, has had his coming out this year. Prior to this year he was solid defensively, especially compared to other teenagers, but he was missing the offensive spark to be in competition with the other two. At least until Jagr was traded to the Panthers. Maybe it shouldn't come as much of a surprise that he didn't put up a ton of points when he was carrying around Brad Boyes, but over the last 82 games he has played he has 65 points including 30 goals. For an extended amount of time he has put up offensive numbers rivaling that of Monahan and MacKinnon's best numbers. He's a big, strong, two-way center who looks like he's going to start putting up the offensive numbers of the other guys. He, however, has missed time due to injury. Of note he's a year younger than Monahan.
|
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Oling_Roachinen For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-28-2016, 11:37 PM
|
#28
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oling_Roachinen
So far I think each has had a pretty decisive year.
Rookie - MacKinnon
Sophomore - Monahan
Third year - Barkov
It's quite clear that MacKinnon has the tools to succeed, especially with his skating, but this is his second (relatively speaking) underwhelming season offensively. I still think he has the most potential of the draft class, but I feel like he's been the most inconsistent and might have the lowest floor of these guys as well.
Barkov, excluding the injuries, has had his coming out this year. Prior to this year he was solid defensively, especially compared to other teenagers, but he was missing the offensive spark to be in competition with the other two. At least until Jagr was traded to the Panthers. Maybe it shouldn't come as much of a surprise that he didn't put up a ton of points when he was carrying around Brad Boyes, but over the last 82 games he has played he has 65 points including 30 goals. For an extended amount of time he has put up offensive numbers rivaling that of Monahan and MacKinnon's best numbers. He's a big, strong, two-way center who looks like he's going to start putting up the offensive numbers of the other guys. He, however, has missed time due to injury. Of note he's a year younger than Monahan.
|
Barkov is a stud, no question. I remember the morning show interviewed Ville Niemenen (played as Barkov's linemate his draft season) and he was in absolute awe of him. 'This Barkov' he kept saying.
Such a smart call from Tallon.
|
|
|
03-28-2016, 11:40 PM
|
#29
|
Franchise Player
|
I think Barkov is definitely ahead of Monahan at the moment - Barkov steps on the ice, and he does a whole lot to control the game anywhere on the ice.
Monahan I think is a step ahead of Barkov offensively, but two steps behind defensively.
With that being said, Monahan isn't terrible in his own end and I think he is coming into his own. It would not surprise me to see Monahan enter the Kopitar - Toews - Bergeron type of center conversations down the road. Many also think that because Barkov is almost a full year younger, that it means that much more, but Barkov (imo) isn't far off the Kopitar-Toews-Bergeron conversation at the moment.
For me, I had MacKinnon ranked at a whole different level coming into the draft, and then Barkov an inch below him by himself too, with Drouin, Nichushkin and Jones next, followed by another tier with Lindholm and Monahan.
Looking back, I don't know if I would select MacKinnon until 3rd. He was extremely impressive in his rookie year - especially during the playoffs where I thought we were witnessing a beast in the making. Now, I am not so sure. He started off as a winger in his rookie year, and to date it has been his best year. At some point, his higher offensive ceiling becomes something of an afterthought if he doesn't put it together. If he does, then I would give him the proverbial crown for that draft.
Currently for me:
Barkov
Monahan
MacKinnon
Still too early to tell though. Might change every year for a few years, or even always have some sensible argument to rank them all differently until they are all retired. I just count my blessings that the Flames got one of the (imo) top 3 players of the draft. In my eyes, this was very much a complete lottery type pick in drafting a franchise center.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Calgary4LIfe For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-28-2016, 11:41 PM
|
#30
|
Our Jessica Fletcher
|
Still embarrassed that I voted Lindholm in the 2013 pre-draft poll.
|
|
|
The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to The Fonz For This Useful Post:
|
Azure,
BeltlineFan,
Bezer,
Domoic,
DropIt,
dying4acup,
Flames_F.T.W,
GreenLantern2814,
Mass_nerder,
Monahan For Mayor,
Mony,
Phaneufenstein,
SebC,
Tbull8,
Wood
|
03-28-2016, 11:48 PM
|
#31
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Fonz
Still embarrassed that I voted Lindholm in the 2013 pre-draft poll.
|
I think I did as well. If I had only known then that the Calgary Flames have blacklisted anyone who voted for Lindholm from working as a scout for them.
|
|
|
03-28-2016, 11:50 PM
|
#32
|
Crash and Bang Winger
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Windsor
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgary4LIfe
I think Barkov is definitely ahead of Monahan at the moment - Barkov steps on the ice, and he does a whole lot to control the game anywhere on the ice.
Monahan I think is a step ahead of Barkov offensively, but two steps behind defensively.
With that being said, Monahan isn't terrible in his own end and I think he is coming into his own. It would not surprise me to see Monahan enter the Kopitar - Toews - Bergeron type of center conversations down the road. Many also think that because Barkov is almost a full year younger, that it means that much more, but Barkov (imo) isn't far off the Kopitar-Toews-Bergeron conversation at the moment.
For me, I had MacKinnon ranked at a whole different level coming into the draft, and then Barkov an inch below him by himself too, with Drouin, Nichushkin and Jones next, followed by another tier with Lindholm and Monahan.
Looking back, I don't know if I would select MacKinnon until 3rd. He was extremely impressive in his rookie year - especially during the playoffs where I thought we were witnessing a beast in the making. Now, I am not so sure. He started off as a winger in his rookie year, and to date it has been his best year. At some point, his higher offensive ceiling becomes something of an afterthought if he doesn't put it together. If he does, then I would give him the proverbial crown for that draft.
Currently for me:
Barkov
Monahan
MacKinnon
Still too early to tell though. Might change every year for a few years, or even always have some sensible argument to rank them all differently until they are all retired. I just count my blessings that the Flames got one of the (imo) top 3 players of the draft. In my eyes, this was very much a complete lottery type pick in drafting a franchise center.
|
Very good post.
I wouldn't count out Risto and Jones though-D takes longer to develop.
|
|
|
03-28-2016, 11:55 PM
|
#33
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by druetetective
Very good post.
I wouldn't count out Risto and Jones though-D takes longer to develop.
|
Yes, that is true - I just decided to compare between the 3 centers anyways. I also wouldn't count out Nichushkin just yet... though he is definitely losing a lot of ground thus far.
I have no idea who I would pick between Ristolainen and Jones head-to-head though. Both are beasts in different ways.
|
|
|
03-28-2016, 11:59 PM
|
#34
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Fonz
Still embarrassed that I voted Lindholm in the 2013 pre-draft poll.
|
Tell me about it - I was genuinely upset we didn't take Nichushkin
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to GreenLantern2814 For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-29-2016, 12:02 AM
|
#35
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: The Armpit of BC: Trail
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenLantern2814
Tell me about it - I was genuinely upset we didn't take Nichushkin
|
Me too.
__________________
Disregard any and all THANKS I give. I'm a dirty, dirty thanks-whore.
|
|
|
03-29-2016, 12:03 AM
|
#36
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Calgary
|
I still take MacKinnon 1st overall.
My list goes
1. MacKinnon
2. Monahan
3. Barkov
4. Ristolainen
5. Domi
6. Jones
7. Nichushkin
8. Horvat
Biggest fallers: Lindholm, Nurse, Drouin
Biggest risers: Duclair, Burakovsky
|
|
|
03-29-2016, 12:09 AM
|
#37
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Hmmmmmmm
|
My top 3 would be Mackinnon Barlov then Monahan
|
|
|
03-29-2016, 12:31 AM
|
#38
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiriHrdina
So in a re-draft, how does it look?
This is my take
1. Barkov
2. Mackinnon
3. Monahan
4. Jones
5. Ristolainen?
6. Domi?
|
For me its
1. Barkov
2. Ristolainen
3. Monahan
4. Jones
5. MacKinnon
6. Lindholm
7. Wennberg
8. Nurse
9. Horvat
10. Domi
11. Nichushkin
12. Duclair
|
|
|
03-29-2016, 12:32 AM
|
#39
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher
For me its
1. Barkov
2. Ristolainen
3. Monahan
4. Jones
5. MacKinnon
6. Lindholm
7. Wennberg
8. Nurse
9. Horvat
10. Domi
11. Nichushkin
12. Duclair
|
That's an insane amount of talent. Every ten-twelve years it seems we get a draft like this.
|
|
|
03-29-2016, 12:34 AM
|
#40
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by H2SO4(aq)
Why Barkov first? just curious.
|
Bigger, stronger, longer reach, more physical. I think Barkov is going to be nearly impossible to check when he's hit his peak. He's an absolute beast. Extremely skilled, good two way. He's a prototypical #1 huge franchise centre IMO. Absolutely lethal on the shootout as well.
I love Monahan and his last half this season has erased concerns I had about his first half but I think Barkov has the chance to be a Getzlaf type dominant, #1 power centre but I think he can be even better than Getzlaf. Monahan I think is just a slight notch behind. MacKinnon I feel has fallen behind both of them.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:35 AM.
|
|