03-14-2016, 10:28 PM
|
#21
|
Franchise Player
|
Love the way he's played so far. Seems confident, poised, smart, and aware enough of his own style to navigate his weaknesses. Owns underrated offensive skills and has been a boon defensively.
I think he'll probably pin the top 4 for a while and become a stabilizing force for the Flames defensively while keeping the attack going in the other end. A really stacked team might place him as #5 but I don't think the Flames will need to get that deep on the blue line at the end of the rebuild.
__________________
|
|
|
03-14-2016, 10:34 PM
|
#22
|
Franchise Player
|
I liked him before he became a Flame and I think he will be a great fit on the team. He is a solid top 4 guy and is capable of playing on the penalty kill. He provides a lot of strength.
|
|
|
03-14-2016, 11:04 PM
|
#23
|
Backup Goalie
Join Date: Aug 2006
Exp:  
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by StrykerSteve
Actually, it was he that suggested Calgary call him that because that's what his Dallas teammates called him.
|
But we're not on the team?
|
|
|
03-14-2016, 11:25 PM
|
#24
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NYYC
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79
It was easier for everyone.
|
Like most of us with a long foreign name, he's probably just tired of people screwing it up... but I'm sure he'd prefer his actual name. Just because some good old boy Texans couldn't say it, doesn't mean people here can't learn it.
Besides, it's not THAT hard. It's mostly phonetic anyway.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Table 5 For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-14-2016, 11:40 PM
|
#25
|
Franchise Player
|
I see him being dealt to the Isles this off-season in a package for Hamonic.
|
|
|
03-14-2016, 11:43 PM
|
#26
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
I hope we can move past Hamonic. And besides, it is right to praise Jokipakkas play since his arrival. I think it would be respectful to not muddy this appreciation thread up with pure speculation.
|
|
|
03-14-2016, 11:43 PM
|
#27
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: 780
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by IgiTang
Am I the only one who thinks calling him Kevin is dumb?
Jokipakka is much more fun to say and not that difficult to spell..
Do you think he appreciates being called Kevin and not by his name?
None the less, I really like the cut of his jib!
|
Jyrki Jokipakka is one of my all-time favorite Flame names.
Kevin is one of my all-time favorite Flame nicknames.
Jyrki "Kevin" Jokipakka is IMO the best name/nickname combo in Flames history. Maybe league history.
|
|
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Plett25 For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-14-2016, 11:48 PM
|
#28
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79
I hope we can move past Hamonic. And besides, it is right to praise Jokipakkas play since his arrival. I think it would be respectful to not muddy this appreciation thread up with pure speculation.
|
The question was...
Quote:
Kevin has looked pretty good in his short time with the Flames so far. How do you see him fitting in the future with the team?
|
Didn't know it was a "Jokipakka circle jerk" only.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Da_Chief For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-14-2016, 11:52 PM
|
#29
|
Resident Videologist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
|
Jokipakka is the exact type of defenceman we desperately needed to round out our top 4 especially. I'm not sure if he is a #4 as of yet, but he's been great so far.
If at worst he's a great #5 I'm pretty thrilled with the return so far!
|
|
|
03-14-2016, 11:52 PM
|
#30
|
First Line Centre
|
The question I have - Should I get my old Dion jersey Kevinized?
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to lazypucker For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-14-2016, 11:54 PM
|
#31
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Kamloops
|
Fair play on the trade to NYI speculation, but for the sake of argument what is the collective view on Jokipakka being better than Hamonic?
All the Hjalmarsson comparisons have got me thinking. I haven't watched Hamonic very much at all, but would he be a significant upgrade over Jokipakkas upside?
|
|
|
03-14-2016, 11:58 PM
|
#32
|
Franchise Player
|
Hamonic is a stud. He's pretty much the Isles #1 defenseman and he's only about a year older than Jokipakka. I like Joki, but I doubt he'll ever be as good as Hamonic.
|
|
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Roof-Daddy For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-15-2016, 12:06 AM
|
#33
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: CGY
|
One can wish in the future..
Brodie-Hamilton
Giordano-Jokipakka
Kylington-Andersson
__________________
Sam "Beard" Bennett
|
|
|
03-15-2016, 12:25 AM
|
#34
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Da_Chief
The question was...
Didn't know it was a "Jokipakka circle jerk" only.
|
Oh my bad. I forgot that this is CP and the Jyrki Jokipakka discussion was actually a thinly veiled title to a Travis Hamonic Circle Jerk thread . Start a Hamonic discussion thread and I'll go talk about Jokipakka there. Sound good? Great, thanks for doing that Chief.
EDIT: And I'll put some thought into the idea anyways. Jokipakka is cheaper than Hamonic, probably fits in better and won't eat into the cap for three more years at least. Jokipakka is a better fit for the Flames now and later than Hamonic is. And I don't want 21 million tied up in the Flames' top 4 D (Hamilton, Gio, Brodie and Hamonic) when we don't know when the cap goes up, our dire need to address G, RW and over all wing depth. Jokipakka saves a bunch of money and has so far proven more than capable of being an uber bargain for three seasons at least. And we haven't even moved Wideman yet...
Last edited by dammage79; 03-15-2016 at 12:40 AM.
|
|
|
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-15-2016, 01:58 AM
|
#35
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Fort St. John, BC
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Table 5
Like most of us with a long foreign name, he's probably just tired of people screwing it up... but I'm sure he'd prefer his actual name. Just because some good old boy Texans couldn't say it, doesn't mean people here can't learn it.
Besides, it's not THAT hard. It's mostly phonetic anyway.
|
Heavy cowboy/rodeo influenced city vs heavy cowboy/rodeo influenced city...
I remember when we traded for Jokinen, I thought it was pronounced "Joke-anin", and I'm sure many others who never heard the name did as well. So if Jyrki Jokipakka is tired of being called "Jerkey Jokeypakka" and is fine with Kevin, so be it. I really doubt he cares what people on a forum call him, be it Jokipakka, Kevin or even ######bag
I personally always have and always will type out/say Jokipakka when mentioning him because it's such an awesome name and much cooler than ...Kevin
|
|
|
03-15-2016, 02:05 AM
|
#36
|
Acerbic Cyberbully
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Table 5
...Besides, it's not THAT hard. It's mostly phonetic anyway.
|
Saying "Jyrki Jokipakka" is a perfect phonetic replacement for "puppy-monkey-baby," and actually makes that commercial almost bearable.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Textcritic For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-15-2016, 07:02 AM
|
#37
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
|
I'm really enjoying Jokipakka and I think he's going to be a part of this team moving forward but I'd love to be able to have him in the bottom pairing. Not that he isn't good enough but if they could have a d corps of: Gio, Brodie, Hamilton, Hamonic, Jokipakka, one of Wotherspoon/Nak and Engelland, I think they'd be doing very well.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
|
|
|
03-15-2016, 07:14 AM
|
#38
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Good to see more Finns on the team again!
Not sure if this has been brought up by someone else but Jokipakka translated means "Riverdeck". It's an unusual surname even by Finnish standards.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Saqe For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-15-2016, 07:31 AM
|
#39
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
Quite happy with this acquisition so far and nice for the organization to finally start looking at younger players on ELC's for the bottom pairing rather than overpaid veteran players which has been a team issue going back to the Darryl Sutter years.
|
|
|
03-15-2016, 07:39 AM
|
#40
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Kamloops
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada
Quite happy with this acquisition so far and nice for the organization to finally start looking at younger players on ELC's for the bottom pairing rather than overpaid veteran players which has been a team issue going back to the Darryl Sutter years.
|
I agree. If he proves to be as steady and capable as he looks so far Jokipakka will be one of the most valuable Flames per dollar on the roster.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:36 AM.
|
|