Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-01-2016, 10:15 AM   #21
devo22
Franchise Player
 
devo22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austria, NOT Australia
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Roger Millions @RogMillions
Would appear Wotherspoon odd man out as Jokipakka will play along side Nakladal. #Flames
Knew something like this would happen, but it still pisses me off. Would rather see Brodie/Giordano - Hamilton/Jokipakka, Nakladal/Wotherspoon.

At this point, I just don't see the value of playing Engelland ahead of Wotherspoon AT ALL.
devo22 is offline  
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to devo22 For This Useful Post:
Old 03-01-2016, 10:16 AM   #22
codynw
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by locsofblu View Post
As much as I want a top 3 pick I'm scared that to much losing will rub off on them. Just look at Edmonton They will never be good EVER! So hope we have a great game tonight. Go Flames
Edmonton is the exception. Look at LA, Chicago, Pittsburgh, Washington...

Edmonton has so many more problems than a "losing culture". And anyways, this team made the 2nd round of the playoffs less than a year ago, it's not like they've been awful for a decade.

Quote:
Originally Posted by devo22 View Post
At this point, I just don't see the value of playing Engelland ahead of Wotherspoon AT ALL.
GRIT™
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames View Post
Before you call me a pessimist or a downer, the Flames made me this way. Blame them.
codynw is offline  
Old 03-01-2016, 10:18 AM   #23
MrMastodonFarm
Lifetime Suspension
 
MrMastodonFarm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by polak View Post
That's pretty good.
I still won't stop proclaiming his uselessness
Can you please? Because it's really grating on the rest of us. Posters who harp on one issue continually tend to stink up the joint.
MrMastodonFarm is offline  
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to MrMastodonFarm For This Useful Post:
Old 03-01-2016, 10:19 AM   #24
TheScorpion
First round-bust
 
TheScorpion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: speculating about AHL players
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by polak View Post
That's pretty good.

I still won't stop proclaiming his uselessness
Why not?

It's quite annoying. Seriously - what's your basis for the Hartley hate you continue to display?
__________________
Need a great deal on a new or pre-owned car? Come see me at Platinum Mitsubishi — 2720 Barlow Trail NE

TheScorpion is offline  
Old 03-01-2016, 10:20 AM   #25
codynw
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion View Post
Why not?

It's quite annoying. Seriously - what's your basis for the Hartley hate you continue to display?
How much time do you have?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames View Post
Before you call me a pessimist or a downer, the Flames made me this way. Blame them.
codynw is offline  
Old 03-01-2016, 10:20 AM   #26
polak
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm View Post
Can you please? Because it's really grating on the rest of us. Posters who harp on one issue continually tend to stink up the joint.
Maybe Jokipakka will give me something else to talk about.

I'll admit that alternating between:

"Hartley sucks", "Gaudreau is awesome", "leave Monahan alone" and "ugh" is getting tiring.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion View Post
what's your basis for the Hartley hate you continue to display?
Seriously? It'd be a lot easier to name the things that Hartley has done well this season. Here we go:

- Made funny jokes.

That's it. But yes, he won the Jack Adams last year so he must be good.

Last edited by polak; 03-01-2016 at 10:24 AM.
polak is offline  
Old 03-01-2016, 10:23 AM   #27
TheScorpion
First round-bust
 
TheScorpion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: speculating about AHL players
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by polak View Post
Maybe Jokipakka will give me something else to talk about.

I'll admit that alternating between:

"Hartley sucks", "Gaudreau is awesome", "leave Monahan alone" and "ugh" is getting tiring.
If that's really all you have to say, maybe you'd benefit from saying it less often.
__________________
Need a great deal on a new or pre-owned car? Come see me at Platinum Mitsubishi — 2720 Barlow Trail NE

TheScorpion is offline  
Old 03-01-2016, 10:38 AM   #28
Table 5
Franchise Player
 
Table 5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NYYC
Exp:
Default

When TheScorpion is questioning your quality-to-quantity ratio, you know it's perhaps time to sit back and reflect on things a bit.
Table 5 is offline  
Old 03-01-2016, 10:41 AM   #29
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by devo22 View Post
Knew something like this would happen, but it still pisses me off. Would rather see Brodie/Giordano - Hamilton/Jokipakka, Nakladal/Wotherspoon.

At this point, I just don't see the value of playing Engelland ahead of Wotherspoon AT ALL.
Well the problem is none of the defensemen deserve to sit, and certainly not Engelland. Engelland is probably one of the least likely to sit since he's the only physical one of the bunch. Based on merit I guess you have to sit one of Wotherspoon or Nakladal but I don't like sitting either of them.

Be interesting to see how the defense goes the rest of the way. We actually have a bit of a logjam when Wideman gets back. Gonna be some tough decisions this offseason and next fall.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline  
Old 03-01-2016, 10:42 AM   #30
TBone290
First Line Centre
 
TBone290's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Exp:
Default

Back to where The Schlemko was born
TBone290 is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to TBone290 For This Useful Post:
Old 03-01-2016, 10:44 AM   #31
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by polak View Post
Maybe Jokipakka will give me something else to talk about.

I'll admit that alternating between:

"Hartley sucks", "Gaudreau is awesome", "leave Monahan alone" and "ugh" is getting tiring...
If you are tired, you could always take a break. Breaks are awesome!
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline  
Old 03-01-2016, 10:49 AM   #32
devo22
Franchise Player
 
devo22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austria, NOT Australia
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
We actually have a bit of a logjam when Wideman gets back. Gonna be some tough decisions this offseason and next fall.
Exactly, and that's why scratching Wotherspoon and/or Nakladal (and I have zero doubt they'll both sit once Wideman is back) serves no purpose at all. If you want to know whether they have a future in this organization, you play them ... you don't scratch them for vets who are gone after next season in either case. The Flames have NOTHING on the line. I'd rather see Wotherspoon and Nakladal in each game than both Engelland and Wideman log 20+ minutes.
devo22 is offline  
Old 03-01-2016, 10:50 AM   #33
GranteedEV
Franchise Player
 
GranteedEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
Well the problem is none of the defensemen deserve to sit, and certainly not Engelland.
Let's think for a second that Engelland has been a + player not once in 14 straight games.

Since Russell got hurt, Engelland was the automatic bump to the 2nd pair. What has he done there? 43% possession, and the Flames have scored 38.5% of the goals with him on the ice at ES. They've scored 52.4% of the goals with him off the ice at ES.

Whether or not Engelland "doesn't deserve to sit" (translation: veteran preference is weighed over merit), whatever Hartley is doing right now with Engelland is not working and we need a shakeup. His fear of "it could be worse" is preventing "it" from ever getting better.

Engelland is the new Chris Butler. An AHLer being played in over his head. He dragged down Wideman all season and people kept blaming Wideman, now he's dragging down Hamilton. He dragged down Brodie last year after Gio went down even though Schlemko was better (and this year proved Schlemko would have been better in those minutes too).

The only partner he's had in his two years here he has not dragged down was Brett Kulak, and the pair were playing extremely sheltered minutes together. And it still got Kulak sent down after a brilliant training camp because he couldn't pull Kulak up.

Last edited by GranteedEV; 03-01-2016 at 11:01 AM.
GranteedEV is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to GranteedEV For This Useful Post:
Old 03-01-2016, 10:51 AM   #34
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Wes Gilbertson @WesGilbertson
Pretty cool day for #Flames RW Garnet Hathaway. Raised a Bruins fan, went to high school a half-hour away, plays at TD Garden tonight
sureLoss is offline  
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 03-01-2016, 11:00 AM   #35
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GranteedEV View Post
Let's think for a second that Engelland has been a + player not once in 14 straight games.

Since Russell got hurt, Engelland was the automatic bump to the 2nd pair. What has he done there? 43% possession, and the Flames have scored 38.5% of the goals with him on the ice at ES. They've scored 52.4% of the goals with him off the ice at ES.

Whether or not Engelland "doesn't deserve to sit" (translation: veteran preference is weighed over merit), whatever Hartley is doing right now with Engelland is not working and we need a shakeup. His fear of "it could be worse" is preventing "it" from ever getting better.

Engelland is the new Chris Butler. An AHLer being played in over his head as a top 4 guy.
Who crushed multiple Flyers last game? Engelland.

Throw the possession metrics out for a second and look at the makeup of our defense. It is a little lacking in the physical, defensive defensemen. So what are the chance we scratch the only one of them? Pretty much zero. Hartley wants us to play hard down the stretch. Engelland plays the toughest, meanest game out of any of our d-men. Engelland is going to make the other team pay the price along the boards and certainly did last game.

Yes Engelland was playing in over his head in the top 4. Doesn't mean he should suddenly be a scratch. The role he fills (physical, defensive defenseman) isn't filled by anyone else on the team right now unless Jokipakka is a similar player. Arguably we're shorter on that role then we should be. You can't scratch a guy when he's the only player filling that important role on the team.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline  
Old 03-01-2016, 11:01 AM   #36
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

I don't know why anyone wouldn't want Engelland in the line up, especially with Marchand out there. Without Engelland, this team is really lacking a physical guy who can actually back it up and keeps other guys honest. I"m all for letting all the prospects play but at the end of the day, you need someone to keep the other team in check to protect those prospects.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is offline  
Old 03-01-2016, 11:01 AM   #37
locsofblu
First Line Centre
 
locsofblu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by codynw View Post
Edmonton is the exception. Look at LA, Chicago, Pittsburgh, Washington...

Edmonton has so many more problems than a "losing culture". And anyways, this team made the 2nd round of the playoffs less than a year ago, it's not like they've been awful for a decade.



GRIT™
This is true but i would like to see our younger guys get rewarded with a win tonight. Thats all.
locsofblu is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to locsofblu For This Useful Post:
Old 03-01-2016, 11:03 AM   #38
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by devo22 View Post
Knew something like this would happen, but it still pisses me off. Would rather see Brodie/Giordano - Hamilton/Jokipakka, Nakladal/Wotherspoon.

At this point, I just don't see the value of playing Engelland ahead of Wotherspoon AT ALL.
This may explain things a little more:

Darren Haynes ‏@DarrenWHaynes 28s28 seconds ago
Darren Haynes Retweeted Roger Millions
FYI - Wotherspoon came up as an emergency recall. Until his status changes, he cannot play ahead of six healthy D.
dammage79 is offline  
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
Old 03-01-2016, 11:04 AM   #39
btimbit
Franchise Player
 
btimbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: St. George's, Grenada
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
Who crushed multiple Flyers last game? Engelland.

Throw the possession metrics out for a second and look at the makeup of our defense. It is a little lacking in the physical, defensive defensemen. So what are the chance we scratch the only one of them? Pretty much zero. Hartley wants us to play hard down the stretch. Engelland plays the toughest, meanest game out of any of our d-men. Engelland is going to make the other team pay the price along the boards and certainly did last game.

Yes Engelland was playing in over his head in the top 4. Doesn't mean he should suddenly be a scratch. The role he fills (physical, defensive defenseman) isn't filled by anyone else on the team right now unless Jokipakka is a similar player. Arguably we're shorter on that role then we should be. You can't scratch a guy when he's the only player filling that important role on the team.
I love him on this team, but not with the minutes he's getting right now
btimbit is offline  
Old 03-01-2016, 11:04 AM   #40
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
This may explain things a little more:

Darren Haynes ‏@DarrenWHaynes 28s28 seconds ago
Darren Haynes Retweeted Roger Millions
FYI - Wotherspoon came up as an emergency recall. Until his status changes, he cannot play ahead of six healthy D.
His status must have changed, otherwise as an emergency recall he has to be sent down as the emergency does not exist anymore. Unless he has already been sent down and it hasn't been announced.

Last edited by sureLoss; 03-01-2016 at 11:07 AM.
sureLoss is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:07 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy