02-19-2016, 04:52 PM
|
#21
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Panthers Fan
Going by Flash's definition, there are only 2 players currently on the Flames that cannot be replaced.
T.J. Brodie
Johnny Gaudreau
end of list.
I like a LOT of other players, and I would consider them part of a winning team, but if we're talking specific skills that can't be replaced, those are your two guys.
|
By that reasoning, no player is on the list. You can replace Gaudreau with Pat Kane, and you can replace Brodie with Doughty.
|
|
|
02-19-2016, 05:03 PM
|
#22
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GranteedEV
So Hossa is/was not a core piece for the Blackhawks because he's old?
|
Are you really comparing our roster and where we are at to the Chicago Blackhawks??? Totally different situations.
|
|
|
02-19-2016, 05:07 PM
|
#23
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Gaudreau - Matthews - Bennett
Bring on your McJesus.
|
|
|
02-19-2016, 05:16 PM
|
#24
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Calgary
|
I would include all of:
Gaudreau
Monahan
Bennett
Brodie
Gio
Hamilton
I think the OP definition is a little too narrow. When looking at the Blackhawks core, I can't see how you could exclude Seabrook, even though he might be considered replaceable.
__________________
From HFBoard oiler fan, in analyzing MacT's management:
O.K. there has been a lot of talk on whether or not MacTavish has actually done a good job for us, most fans on this board are very basic in their analysis and I feel would change their opinion entirely if the team was successful.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Fighting Banana Slug For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-19-2016, 05:19 PM
|
#25
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Park Hyatt Tokyo
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Panthers Fan
Going by Flash's definition, there are only 2 players currently on the Flames that cannot be replaced.
T.J. Brodie
Johnny Gaudreau
end of list.
I like a LOT of other players, and I would consider them part of a winning team, but if we're talking specific skills that can't be replaced, those are your two guys.
|
This. Just those 2.
Bennett and Hamilton haven't quite reached the point yet where they've proven themselves unreplaceable. Monahan is still in the evaluation stage of how good he'll be. Giordano could be core, but might as well be off the list due to his age.
|
|
|
02-19-2016, 05:25 PM
|
#26
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Void between Darkness and Light
|
Agreed with Cali and others, however, the reason I included Bennett was because I think he has the skill that is in shortest supply around the league and that's Compete.
That's what makes him effective, his will to win.
|
|
|
02-19-2016, 05:28 PM
|
#27
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Monahan, Bennett, Gaudreau, Brodie, Hamilton as the foundation you build the temple.
Not quite unmovable but you don't really move until they're developed and see what they have:
Kylington, Jankowski, Andersson, Hickey and Gillies.
__________________
"Everybody's so desperate to look smart that nobody is having fun anymore" -Jackie Redmond
Last edited by dammage79; 02-19-2016 at 05:32 PM.
|
|
|
02-19-2016, 05:28 PM
|
#28
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Calgary
|
So Flash, is it safe to say for Chicago, you would only include Toews, Kane and Keith?
__________________
From HFBoard oiler fan, in analyzing MacT's management:
O.K. there has been a lot of talk on whether or not MacTavish has actually done a good job for us, most fans on this board are very basic in their analysis and I feel would change their opinion entirely if the team was successful.
|
|
|
02-19-2016, 05:30 PM
|
#29
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Saving the world one gif at a time
|
I just hope we don't make the same mistake with Gio as we did with Iggy, held on too long and didn't get much back for him in return. Iggy should have been traded two years prior to being dealt.
__________________
|
|
|
02-19-2016, 05:31 PM
|
#30
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Barthelona
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fighting Banana Slug
So Flash, is it safe to say for Chicago, you would only include Toews, Kane and Keith?
|
I think right now that would be accurate.
Maybe Panarin comes into the discussion if he continues his upward progression.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by snipetype
k im just not going to respond to your #### anymore because i have better things to do like #### my model girlfriend rather then try to convince people like you of commonly held hockey knowledge.
|
|
|
|
02-19-2016, 05:31 PM
|
#31
|
#1 Goaltender
|
I always though in terms of elite (nearly untouchable), core (difficult to replace and/or great teammates), and hot prospect (too young for core, but trending that way if not elite). So I guess, by default, elite is also core but is hot prospect?
Elite: Gaudreau, Giordano, Brodie
Core: Monahan, Backlund, Hamilton, Frolik
Hot prospect: Bennett, Gillies, 2016 1st-round pick
__________________
"I think the eye test is still good, but analytics can sure give you confirmation: what you see...is that what you really believe?"
Scotty Bowman, 0 NHL games played
|
|
|
02-19-2016, 05:51 PM
|
#32
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Void between Darkness and Light
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fighting Banana Slug
So Flash, is it safe to say for Chicago, you would only include Toews, Kane and Keith?
|
Yes, absolutely.
If you're a team with good management, you can afford to have a larger group of players deemed by others to be your core, but the engine that drives the hawks and the 3 players they'd never consider trading before the age of 35 are Kane, Toews and Keith. The hawks don't have near the dead weight the flames have which affords them the luxury of keeping Hossa and Seabrook, but if they had more than one Bickell, that's probably not the case.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Flash Walken For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-19-2016, 06:37 PM
|
#34
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
|
Gaudreau, Bennett, Monahan
Brodie, Hamilton, Giordano
That is the core of this team and players I would be unlikely to trade if I was GM. In my opinion the only one I would move if I am the Flames is Gio and that is strictly an age thing. His leadership and role on the team keep him in the core for me
|
|
|
02-19-2016, 07:19 PM
|
#35
|
Franchise Player
|
Going by this definition:
'Core Player' as defined by Flash Walken is a player who likely has few peers in the league, has demonstrated value specifically to the Flames Organization and who has specific characteristics that can't be easily replaced in the trade market or free agency.
Gaudreau, Monahan, Brodie and Hamilton. Bennett is well on his way to being in this group, but he's got to play a full season and prove a bit more to get there. I fully expect him to be on this list by the end of the season. None of these guys would be available in trade without paying through the nose or an ungodly amount in salary.
The lack of Monahan showing up on some lists makes me wonder what people expect of him? A big, skilled center, that can do everything? How is that not a core player?
|
|
|
02-19-2016, 07:28 PM
|
#36
|
Franchise Player
|
Gaudreau, Brodie and Giordano are currently core. You won't realistically get better players than those. Monahan, Bennett and Hamilton project to be core, Gio will drop out in a number of seasons.
|
|
|
02-19-2016, 09:37 PM
|
#37
|
Franchise Player
|
I understand many peoples definition of core includes potential and those you would not trade away. But in my opinion Hamilton still needs to earn his place as part of the core. Right now most of us are influenced by his draft position, what we gave up to get him and his contract. He still has yet to earn it on the ice. Doesn't mean I want to trade him.
|
|
|
02-19-2016, 09:50 PM
|
#38
|
I believe in the Pony Power
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Brew
I understand many peoples definition of core includes potential and those you would not trade away. But in my opinion Hamilton still needs to earn his place as part of the core. Right now most of us are influenced by his draft position, what we gave up to get him and his contract.
|
Maybe that is what you are influenced by - but maybe others are evaluating his improved play throughout the season.
Part of core is projecting where the player will be over time. By your definition Sam would also not be part of the core.
|
|
|
02-20-2016, 12:50 AM
|
#39
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Stampede Grounds
|
Hard to believe there is Flames fans who don't put Monahan in the core list - the guy is only 21 and already has 70 goals in 211 games playing 1st line centre against the best checking lines in the NHL. He seems very coachable and modest for a player who will be an elite NHL player. My bet is that if you told other NHL teams that they could pick any player off the Flames roster - Monahan would be chosen more often than any of the others on this list.
|
|
|
02-20-2016, 12:59 AM
|
#40
|
RANDOM USER TITLE CHANGE
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: South Calgary
|
Walken would trade his core. This thread is a tarp.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:05 PM.
|
|