|
View Poll Results: Where do you like Ferland on this roster?
|
|
Top line with Gaudreau and Monahan
|
  
|
43 |
19.03% |
|
2nd line with Bennett and Frolik
|
  
|
80 |
35.40% |
|
Backlund's line wherever that is
|
  
|
33 |
14.60% |
|
Stajan's line
|
  
|
67 |
29.65% |
|
Press Box
|
  
|
2 |
0.88% |
|
Stockton
|
  
|
1 |
0.44% |
09-30-2015, 09:58 AM
|
#21
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada
First or second line? Really? Can someone remind me what this guy has done outside of making an over the hill Bieksa look bad?
|
I agree, I think expectations are way too high for him this early in his career. He came in the game late last season and was relatively fresh, but he was slowing down by the 2nd round.
He has 2 goals and only 26 regular season games, and some people want him on the top line. That seems crazy to me. Was he even on the top line in the AHL?
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to FlamesAddiction For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-30-2015, 09:58 AM
|
#22
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Deep South
|
I put him on 2nd unit with Bennett and Frolik, but it would be interesting to see if he can mesh with Monahan and Gaudreau. If he was on top line, we would benefit from a more balanced top 6.
|
|
|
09-30-2015, 10:02 AM
|
#23
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: 403
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18
I think I like him with Bennett.
Personally have Johnny-Monahan and Ferland-Bennett as pairs. Then Hudler and Frolik can rotate on the lines as the RWs.
|
Sounds good to me
|
|
|
09-30-2015, 10:02 AM
|
#24
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
|
It's so tough to say for sure, there are so many players that look good together. This team is very versatile and that's amazing. Guys like Ferland, Frolik, Backlund, Colborne and even Jones don't look like they'd be out of place anywhere in the lineup. There are so many line combinations that just look good together that it's hard to pick one.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
|
|
|
09-30-2015, 10:07 AM
|
#25
|
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Section 120
|
Ferland has been good on every line he's played on, because he's a good all-around player.
I think he adds a lot to the top 6.
Gaudreau - Monahan - Hudler
Ferland - Bennett - Frolik
I think besides Gaudreau, Monahan, and Bennett the rest are interchangeable.
|
|
|
09-30-2015, 10:14 AM
|
#26
|
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Calgary
|
Don't really care - just want to see him matched up against McDavid for home games.
__________________
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to YYC in LAX For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-30-2015, 10:15 AM
|
#27
|
|
Franchise Player
|
No strong preference. I just like Ferland in the lineup. He adds lots of flexibility to the possible line combinations.
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Calgary4LIfe For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-30-2015, 10:21 AM
|
#29
|
|
First Line Centre
|
I like the idea of third line with Bennett. I don't see Bennett being the #2 centerman on the team.
Gaudreau - Monahan - Hudler
Bouma - Backlund - Frolik
Ferland - Bennett - Jones/Colborne/Jooris
__________________
'Skank' Marden: I play hockey and I fornicate, 'cause those are the two most fun things to do in cold weather. - Mystery Alaska
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to shutout For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-30-2015, 10:32 AM
|
#30
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Flame Country
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada
First or second line? Really? Can someone remind me what this guy has done outside of making an over the hill Bieksa look bad?
|
He produced very well in the AHL and has done nothing but impress in training camp. The guy has scored some decent goals and made some beautiful passes while still maintaining his physical dominance. Hartley has played him on the top 2 lines for games and he hasn't looked out of place.
Personally I think he would be dynamite on a 2nd line with Bennett and Frolik. Both Bennett and Ferland can play the crash and bang fore check game while Frolik brings a steady defensive presence on the ice and helps keep puck possession in the offensive zone (something Bennett will need in his first year playing centre).
|
|
|
09-30-2015, 10:59 AM
|
#31
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Calgary
|
I like how he's looked on the first line with monahan and gaudreau however keeping hudler with them for proven offence is also a plus. I see a fit for him as well with bennett and frolik as well because he also adds a bit of a deterrent for players going after bennett since bennett has a bit of an edge to his game.
|
|
|
09-30-2015, 11:15 AM
|
#32
|
|
Franchise Player
|
It's an interesting question. Where do I like him? Anywhere in the top 6 would obviously be the best for this club. If Ferland could be a legit top 6 forward for this team playing the game he play's, that's just simply the best outcome for the Flames, but that kind of goes without saying.
I've thought Top 6 has always potentially been Ferland's ceiling, but not where my expectations were for him going into this year. To be honest, the game I saw on the weekend vs. Vancouver, I thought he looked great up there. Last night vs. Colorado, he looked out of place.
So time will tell I guess. I'm not married to any line combo's, although I agree that Mony / Gaudreau just seems to work well, and I believe that Hudler can fit in anywhere in the top 2 lines and be lights out. So I'm simply cheering for, but not expecting Ferland to be on either of the Top 2 lines, couldn't care less where it is. I'm thinking it's more likely he bounces between the 3rd and 4th line as the season goes on this year.
|
|
|
09-30-2015, 11:28 AM
|
#33
|
|
#1 Goaltender
|
I like the size he brings to the top line. Nobody will mess with Johnny while Ferkland is on the ice.
|
|
|
09-30-2015, 11:29 AM
|
#34
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Calgary
|
I have him on Stajans line to start the season but I think he could easily end up playing top 6 minutes before the end of the year.
Much like Justin Trudeau, just not ready
|
|
|
09-30-2015, 11:34 AM
|
#35
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poe969
It's so tough to say for sure, there are so many players that look good together. This team is very versatile and that's amazing. Guys like Ferland, Frolik, Backlund, Colborne and even Jones don't look like they'd be out of place anywhere in the lineup. There are so many line combinations that just look good together that it's hard to pick one.
|
there are some pretty obvious things:
1) Gaudreau-Hudler-Monahan is currently one of the top lines in Hockey. They were basically un-stoppable over the last part of last year. They will not be broken up any more than the Sedins of 3-4 years ago were going to be broken up.... until some coach figures out how to play against them.
2) The Burke theory of beef. The Flames now have 4 beef guys that can easily play top 9 minutes 12-16 minutes a game. Ferland, Bouma, Jones and Colborne. All things being equal I would expect them to be in the line-up for every game they are healthy and getting minutes.
3) That leaves 2 spots in the top 9 that default right now to Backlund and Frolik.
4) Bennett, Stajan, Byron, Jooris, Bollig,Raymond start out as the 4th line and get 10 minutes or less a game until injury or poor play push them into more ice time.
Not only line-up spots will have to be earned but so will ice-time over the game. If anyone is having a lackluster (lets call it a Glencross/Raymond/Stempniak kind of game) they should and likely will find themselves getting only 2-3 shifts in the 3rd period.
Last edited by ricardodw; 09-30-2015 at 11:54 AM.
|
|
|
09-30-2015, 11:37 AM
|
#36
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jg13
I have him on Stajans line to start the season but I think he could easily end up playing top 6 minutes before the end of the year.
Much like Justin Trudeau, just not ready
|
But how's his hair?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames
Before you call me a pessimist or a downer, the Flames made me this way. Blame them.
|
|
|
|
09-30-2015, 11:40 AM
|
#37
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jg13
I have him on Stajans line to start the season but I think he could easily end up playing top 6 minutes before the end of the year.
Much like Justin Trudeau, just not ready
|
Nice hair though...........
Edit: Codnyw beat me to it.
|
|
|
09-30-2015, 11:51 AM
|
#38
|
|
Franchise Player
|
I have him on the Stajan line to start the season, but as Hartley loves to remind us his lineups are written in pencil. I feel that Ferland had a very good chemistry with Stajan last season. They were dominating the play and providing secondary scoring. However in games where the other team starts taking liberties with Monahan and Gaudreau Ferland seems like a good option on their wing.
|
|
|
09-30-2015, 11:56 AM
|
#39
|
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Calgary
|
I think he starts the season on Stajan and Jones' line, because they were successful last year together.
I think Hartley keeps our top line together, one of the best lines in the NHL last season. I think Backlund is our 2A centre and Bennett is our 2B centre, they will get pretty equal time I think to start the season.
I think in the future Ferland will be a top 6 player for the flames but he has to earn it first. I don't think he has done that yet.
I see the lines starting like this:
top line: JG - SM - JH
2nd: Bouma - Backlund - Frolik
3rd: Byron/Jooris - Bennett - Colborne
4th: Ferland - Stajan - Jones
This is just to start the season, if all pans out and Bennett earns 2nd line minutes, then he gets to play with Frolik or Hudler, maybe even on the wing on the top line. Who knows.
I think there are many options and I know that Hartley will make all the guys earn every minute they get. What I would like to see happen eventually to even out the roster, if everyone pans out:
JG - SM - Frolik
Ferland - SB - JH
Bouma - Backlund - Colborne
Byron - Stajan - Jones
__________________
"You're worried about the team not having enough heart. I'm worried about the team not having enough brains." HFOil fan, August 12th, 2020. E=NG
|
|
|
09-30-2015, 12:16 PM
|
#40
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by foshizzle11
I think he starts the season on Stajan and Jones' line, because they were successful last year together.
I think Hartley keeps our top line together, one of the best lines in the NHL last season. I think Backlund is our 2A centre and Bennett is our 2B centre, they will get pretty equal time I think to start the season.
I think in the future Ferland will be a top 6 player for the flames but he has to earn it first. I don't think he has done that yet.
I see the lines starting like this:
top line: JG - SM - JH
2nd: Bouma - Backlund - Frolik
3rd: Byron/Jooris - Bennett - Colborne
4th: Ferland - Stajan - Jones
This is just to start the season, if all pans out and Bennett earns 2nd line minutes, then he gets to play with Frolik or Hudler, maybe even on the wing on the top line. Who knows.
I think there are many options and I know that Hartley will make all the guys earn every minute they get. What I would like to see happen eventually to even out the roster, if everyone pans out:
JG - SM - Frolik
Ferland - SB - JH
Bouma - Backlund - Colborne
Byron - Stajan - Jones
|
Frolik has never been on a #1 line in his 7 year NHL career. The Flames have been looking for #1 line since Iginla and Conroy/Langkow / Tanquay
Is Frolik going to replace Hudler without the line as a whole taking a hit?
I think that if Bennett plays centre his style of play will require 2 of the beef players on his wing. The level of physical intensity will increase a lot the way Bennett plays.
JG- SM - JH
Ferland-Bennett-Jones/Colborne
Bouma-Backlund-Frolik ---- real shutdown line
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:43 AM.
|
|