Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-23-2015, 11:43 AM   #21
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Sharks kind of did it in 2010.

They offer sheeted Hjalmarsson.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nhl/news/story?id=5366965

Which caused Chicago to have to walk from the Niemi arbitration offer and he then signed with San Jose.

Last edited by SuperMatt18; 06-23-2015 at 11:54 AM.
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to SuperMatt18 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-23-2015, 11:52 AM   #22
Street Pharmacist
Franchise Player
 
Street Pharmacist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikephoen View Post
I don't hate this idea. I doubt it works very often, and obviously you'll never get the 'top' guy in the dual offer sheet scenario. But if you actually want the other guy and are willing to pay a second for him...

Offer sheeting your closest rivals has other advantages as well. For example you can give Toffoli a contract offer that doesn't spend any of his UFA years and right at the top of the 1st and 3rd compensation level and cause LA future problems with resigning him. And if you want Jones for a 2nd, you will either get him, or give LA another problem to deal with. Doubt they want a back up making over 3M with their cap situation.
They could just offer a longer term and would nullify the offer, no?
Street Pharmacist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2015, 11:58 AM   #23
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist View Post
They could just offer a longer term and would nullify the offer, no?
Once a player has signed an offer sheet, that will be his new contract. The only question is which of the two teams he'll be playing for.

Either his original team matches it and he stays there on the new contract, or his original teams takes the compensation and lets him go to the team that gave him the offer sheet.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
Old 06-23-2015, 12:34 PM   #24
cannon7
Needs More Cowbell
 
cannon7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Not Canada, Eh?
Exp:
Default

Anyone who thinks an RFA wouldn't sign an offer sheet at or above market value is not thinking things through. Signing an offer sheet effectively guarantees you that salary/term. It puts your team in the hot seat to match. Signing an offer sheet pretty much short circuits the whole negotiations process and gives the RFA a leg up -- which is why GMs hate them. You're also unlikely to get low-balled with an offer sheet as the team offering you it is taking a risk and wants to offer you a salary/term that they think the RFA rights owner won't match -- or a salary/term that will hamper the RFA rights owner if they do match.
cannon7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:30 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy