Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Leagues and Games > Calgarypuck Hockey League
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-22-2015, 12:46 PM   #21
Knut
 
Knut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Exp:
Default

I can also take on the contract and offer greater value.

He should have really shopped him around more.

Now Make like your name and DropIT!
Knut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2015, 12:54 PM   #22
Hockey
Franchise Player
 
Hockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pitt Meadows
Exp:
Default

Alright, let's see what you guys got. Already have a good offer for him, now let's see if anyone can up that.
Hockey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2015, 03:21 PM   #23
3thirty
#1 Goaltender
 
3thirty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Back in Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey View Post
Alright, let's see what you guys got. Already have a good offer for him, now let's see if anyone can up that.
Step 1) accept trade that will get vetoed and get gm to post
Step 2) create discussion about said player getting called elite
Step 3) create bidding war in market
Step 4) PROFIT
3thirty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2015, 03:36 PM   #24
DropIt
Franchise Player
 
DropIt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Red Deer, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hesla View Post
I can also take on the contract and offer greater value.

He should have really shopped him around more.

Now Make like your name and DropIT!
Well I guess you can, while I did.

And as someone openly against the idea of having trades go through a review process, I dont see anything wrong with gauging values and getting an idea of what is/is not to be accepted by a jury of peers.
DropIt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2015, 06:45 PM   #25
Hanna Sniper
Franchise Player
 
Hanna Sniper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DropIt View Post
Well I guess you can, while I did.

And as someone openly against the idea of having trades go through a review process, I dont see anything wrong with gauging values and getting an idea of what is/is not to be accepted by a jury of peers.
This is crazy talk, common the handcuffs are only on new GM for a very very short period dont make it out like there a long list and every trade in the CPHL goes through this process

It's done for a reason, because the league has a history of feasting of the fresh fish. Every time a new GM was added a trade couldn't happen because all the GM were circling the new guy like a pack of wolves

It's a process to protect the new guys from making a mistake that they "might" regret... because almost every GM in the league regrets their first couple trades because with hindsight.. yes some good trades get blocked but you know what... they handcuffs are on the GM for a very short period, not even a couple weeks< make the trade then when there is no review process

Protect the new guy for a couple weeks from mistake ,a mistake they might regret is such a horrible thing that we have to be openly against the whole process... because a deal can't wait two weeks just in case a GM might catchup wit the rules

I've been on both sides of the ruling, and although I always like the deal, I understand the reasoning for it. Anti up or sit on your hands a couple weeks and hope the GM doesn't move him elsewhere and still interested in the deal
__________________
2018 OHL CHAMPIONS
2022 OHL CHAMPIONS
Hanna Sniper is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Hanna Sniper For This Useful Post:
Old 05-22-2015, 08:12 PM   #26
Hockey
Franchise Player
 
Hockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pitt Meadows
Exp:
Default

Hey guys, I have gotten all your offers and I am pretty sure I know which one I am going to take. Will hopefully come to a decision tonight.
Hockey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2015, 08:31 PM   #27
Drury18
Franchise Player
 
Drury18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Exp:
Default

Are you discussing it with any GM's who aren't bidding to get other opinions?
Drury18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2015, 09:16 PM   #28
DropIt
Franchise Player
 
DropIt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Red Deer, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hanna Sniper View Post
This is crazy talk, common the handcuffs are only on new GM for a very very short period dont make it out like there a long list and every trade in the CPHL goes through this process

It's done for a reason, because the league has a history of feasting of the fresh fish. Every time a new GM was added a trade couldn't happen because all the GM were circling the new guy like a pack of wolves

It's a process to protect the new guys from making a mistake that they "might" regret... because almost every GM in the league regrets their first couple trades because with hindsight.. yes some good trades get blocked but you know what... they handcuffs are on the GM for a very short period, not even a couple weeks< make the trade then when there is no review process

Protect the new guy for a couple weeks from mistake ,a mistake they might regret is such a horrible thing that we have to be openly against the whole process... because a deal can't wait two weeks just in case a GM might catchup wit the rules

I've been on both sides of the ruling, and although I always like the deal, I understand the reasoning for it. Anti up or sit on your hands a couple weeks and hope the GM doesn't move him elsewhere and still interested in the deal
My stance is there should be more room for mistakes to be made. trying to force trades that other people tend to deem as being fair kind of sucks regardless of how long.

Also, every gm here knows that not every trade is subject to this process and there is a breaking in system, so it should be painfully obvious that Im not implying the league is set under these rules all the time.

This isn't a direct reference to this trade either, i really dobt mind it being rejected. Its happened before and will happen again, the leash is just too short for my liking is all. I can understand why the rule is there.

Either way, im past discussing it.

Last edited by DropIt; 05-22-2015 at 10:11 PM.
DropIt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2015, 10:14 PM   #29
JiriHrdina
I believe in the Pony Power
 
JiriHrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DropIt View Post
My stance is there should be more room for mistakes to be made. trying to force trades that other people tend to deem as being fair kind of sucks regardless of how long.
That`s how things used to be and everytime a new GM was hired there was a long line to take advantage of them.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DropIt View Post
Also, every gm here knows that not every trade is subject to this process and there is a breaking in system, so it should be painfully obvious that Im not implying the league is set under these rules all the time.
Incorrect. Every trade a new GM IS subject to these rules. We do the same thing every time. The trade is posted in the commissioner forum and we discussed, and if necessary, vote on whether or not it should be rejected or accepted. We do this until a new GM has proven themselves.
JiriHrdina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2015, 10:17 PM   #30
Hanna Sniper
Franchise Player
 
Hanna Sniper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Exp:
Default

(response to Dropit)

I can respect that


I have similar views about the weekly awards system it can indeed be frustrating at times but I readily don't think it's intentional
__________________
2018 OHL CHAMPIONS
2022 OHL CHAMPIONS
Hanna Sniper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2015, 01:15 AM   #31
fundamentals
Backup Goalie
 
fundamentals's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Exp:
Default

Obviously I'm new here and don't have a full grasp of how everything works but I can't imagine any scenario where this is a good deal, and I for one am thankful that the league doesn't allow new GM's to make any deals they want. As has been made clear to me by almost every GM I've spoken to, player values in this league are much different from "real" NHL and I think until people fully understand that they should be prevented from making mistakes that will hurt their teams (and thus the league) until they have a better grasp on what's what.
fundamentals is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2015, 06:09 AM   #32
Slava
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DropIt View Post
My stance is there should be more room for mistakes to be made. trying to force trades that other people tend to deem as being fair kind of sucks regardless of how long.

Also, every gm here knows that not every trade is subject to this process and there is a breaking in system, so it should be painfully obvious that Im not implying the league is set under these rules all the time.

This isn't a direct reference to this trade either, i really dobt mind it being rejected. Its happened before and will happen again, the leash is just too short for my liking is all. I can understand why the rule is there.

Either way, im past discussing it.
I know you're past discussing it, but there is plenty of room for mistakes after the review period. Look no further than my franchise! I've made plenty of terrible deals and one or two decent ones over my tenure. I remember what it was like being a brand-new GM though and there were certainly a couple guys (no longer in the league) who couldn't wait for me to be able to trade because my thoughts on the value of players and assets was not in line with the league. Its really better for everyone if that kind of thing doesn't happen.

I would also note that I made a trade very early on that was a little bit questionable and rather than an outright decline, I was approached by one of the commissioners who just said "do you realise this and this?" and made sure I knew some of the finer points before approving the trade. That was great because it not only covered that particular deal off, but made me look at those points for deals down the road.

Anyway, don't worry. This deal might not have worked, but your trading partner is a Canucks fan, and once he's off the leash we'll be able to send him things like Baertschi for a 2nd rounder and the league won't step in to protect him from himself!
Slava is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:40 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy