Quote:
Originally Posted by Hanna Sniper
Sorry Slava, I'm in a 100% agreement, just stating that the cap was very much apart of the deal and made up a portion of the return... Some don't acknowledge cap changing hands in deals put without them a lot of these deals won't happen without them... if the deals wouldn't happen without their inclusion then they make up a vital part of the deal
To say I signed Horton and then traded him for a 2nd, look at me I'm a genius is a little misleading as part of the deal, leaving out that you are paying his salary to play for another team. Hell they can waive and sent Horton to the minors and rest on the idea that they got almost 3M for a cheaper price most teams pay for cap
|
LOL, who is saying this Doug? It certainly isn't me. I would say 95% of deals are done under the assumption that the difference in salary is being sent. It is an asset when going above the difference. Cap means absolutely nothing to me so from my point of view, it is not an asset.
I simply wanted to point out that I got flammed for signing Horton and wanted to show that I got an asset out of signing him for nothing. That is all. You are over complicating this to the max, as usual.
