Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-09-2015, 10:09 PM   #21
JohnnySkittles
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: NB
Exp:
Default

Take a chance, no way you can afford to give up a 50/50 chance on a guy like McDavid. Future superstar.
JohnnySkittles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2015, 10:10 PM   #22
Miniac
#1 Goaltender
 
Miniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Perth Australia
Exp:
Default

I'll take the 50%.
Miniac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2015, 10:13 PM   #23
MattP
Draft Pick
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Default

What about 30?
MattP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2015, 10:15 PM   #24
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

I'll take the mystery box, it could be anything - even McDavid!
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2015, 10:18 PM   #25
Jason14h
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Who really cares in Vancouver or Edmonton gets him. It's as dumb as people who thought we should take a worst pick then trade Sven to Van.
Jason14h is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2015, 10:56 PM   #26
stemit14
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

Definitely 0%. The flames are more set for the future than either the oilers or Canucks. Therefore, no need to risk giving vancouvrr or Edmonton a shot at catching up by getting a franchise center.
stemit14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2015, 11:15 PM   #27
Perogy Man
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MattP View Post
Would you take a 50% chance at getting McDavid with the catch if the Flames don't get him Vancouver or Edmonton did for sure. Or would you take a 0% shot with the guarantee both Vancouver and Edmonton also got 0%?

If you do take the 50% shot at what percentage would you say it's not worth it?
Unabomber Grammar King award has just been awarded!
Perogy Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2015, 11:17 PM   #28
the2bears
Franchise Player
 
the2bears's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Bay Area
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MattP View Post
Would you take a 50% chance at getting McDavid with the catch if the Flames don't get him Vancouver or Edmonton did for sure. Or would you take a 0% shot with the guarantee both Vancouver and Edmonton also got 0%?

If you do take the 50% shot at what percentage would you say it's not worth it?
Seriously, though, why ask this question without giving your own answer?
the2bears is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2015, 11:20 PM   #29
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

well the Oilers are gonna have the 2nd best chance to get him as it is so why not take the chance?
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2015, 11:46 PM   #30
powderjunkie
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

50. Oilers would still be inept, the Canucks might get good enough to make the finals again and riot.
powderjunkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2015, 11:12 AM   #31
Teh_Bandwagoner
First Line Centre
 
Teh_Bandwagoner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The wagon's name is "Gaudreau"
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
I'll take the mystery box, it could be anything - even McDavid!
Or it could even be a boat!

And FTR, I say bring on the 50%! Who cares about Edmonton. They already have like 15-20% odds already. And who cares about Vancouver? Nobody I say!

Hell I'd happily take the 1/3 odds provided we don't sacrifice our current position.
__________________
Teh_Bandwagoner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2015, 11:47 AM   #32
MattP
Draft Pick
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by the2bears View Post
Seriously, though, why ask this question without giving your own answer?
I did give my answer, but thanks for coming out
MattP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2015, 11:55 AM   #33
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

I'd take the 50%. One player isn't going to make the Oilers contenders, they'll just be adding McDavid to their ruined prospects cupboard in a few years.

As for Vancouver, perhaps McDavid would make a bigger impact over there, but they don't have the depth like the Flames do.

I'll take a stab at McDavid, because we'd have the better chance of winning him.
ForeverFlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2015, 12:07 PM   #34
saillias
Franchise Player
 
saillias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Exp:
Default

0!

Anyone who plays video games knows you don't hit the "attack" button if your hit chance is lower than about 85%... it's a guaranteed waste of a turn.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by JobHopper View Post
The thing is, my posts, thoughts and insights may be my opinions but they're also quite factual.
saillias is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2015, 12:21 PM   #35
polak
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

Pshh Edmonton will screw him up anyways.
polak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2015, 04:13 PM   #36
CSharp
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Exp:
Default

I'd take a 50% chance at McDavid and the other 50% on Eichel. That'll be 100% guaranteed to have one of those franchise players.
CSharp is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:03 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy