Quote:
Originally Posted by Minnie
Yes I'm aware. But in this video the guy was down. Not moving. Dog was let loose and all he did was go chew up the guy's thigh before being yanked back. One presumes the dog would have been more effective when the guy was standing holding the knives and actually a source of concern. It was clear he was down after the shots - they beanbagged him and he barely twitched. So no need to let the dog loose at that point. Much like wanting to shoot him in the penis, letting the dog have a go at him after he was incapacitated gives the impression it was just done to be vindictive, not because there was any real reason to let the dog loose.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c
okay Lou can't play because he played last night...but a guy who just lived the movie "plains trains and automobiles" and is still an AHL goalie should go in
sounds legit
|
As I previously said, I agree with your statements concerning improper use of the dog as well as ghastly tact of the part of APD.
Although maybe not completely clear after re-reading my own original post, my point was the canine is following directions from a human based on training. Just like your dog sits by the back door to go outside... He's following training in the hopes of praise for what you have directed him to do. The dog absolutely would have been better utilized far sooner in this encounter, if at all, which begs the question why the officers weren't trained better than the dog...
Again, I think (as do many other peace officers here in the states) that these individuals were brutal and in no way way in enough of a threatening situation to proceed the way they did. Boyd actually was turning his back and started up the hill before anyone opened fire at him.
Edit: Not sure why it quoted Dino, the pitfalls of using cut/paste on a phone.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk