Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-18-2014, 02:18 PM   #21
Old Yeller
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MissTeeks View Post
Aaron Portzline@Aportzline35s

Told Overhardt-Johansen camp has extended a new two-year proposal to #CBJ this afternoon.
"We just heard the news about Horton being injured again... 2 years @ $20 million"
Old Yeller is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Old Yeller For This Useful Post:
Old 09-18-2014, 02:25 PM   #22
T@T
Lifetime Suspension
 
T@T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeN View Post
Stamkos, Toews and Kane are comparables? man I'd love to know what his agent is smoking. That's like saying a 93 Mustang LX is on even ground as a GT500. just crazy, Id just leave him and let him rot for a year.
Depends.

I don't know how you can blame players not wanting a bridge deal anymore, just look up north.
T@T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2014, 02:25 PM   #23
Badgers Nose
Franchise Player
 
Badgers Nose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Exp:
Default

IMO this is the kind of guy that warrants an offer sheet. Surprised no one has bitten.
Badgers Nose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2014, 02:26 PM   #24
GGG
Franchise Player
 
GGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Exp:
Default

I think the jackets offer is reasonable and that Johansson should counter with 2 yr 7 which the jackets would take.

The 8yr 40 plus deal would be hard to turn down though as a concussion or a knee injury could leaveyou with nothing.
GGG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2014, 02:28 PM   #25
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JMN View Post
Not sure if already discussed, but here are the numbers offered to Ryan:




The two year offer seems low, but do you guys feel the lengthier offers were fair?
Why give him any more than the 3 million for the bridge contract.... Until the KHL offers him more or Jay Feaster shows up some place and offers him an offer sheet there is no other place he can play.

They want him long term..... If he is just setting up to get the huge long-term UFA deal then he has to take on the risk. Getting more than the 6M for teh two years takes away the risk and still would give him a shot at the 9-10M UFA contract.


PK Subban signed a 2 year bridge contact for 5.5M. He took the risk and now is reaping the reward.

2013-14 Johansen is a great young player but 2011-12 Subban was a clear #1 d-man for the Habs.
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2014, 02:30 PM   #26
Weitz
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by T@T View Post
I don't know how you can blame players not wanting a bridge deal anymore, just look up north.
Wouldn't be surprised if RJ asked for 6x6 the blue jackets would agree. Seeing how they offered 5.75/8 years, would be some wiggle room.
Weitz is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2014, 02:36 PM   #27
djsFlames
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

I'd be in awe if anyone threw me a contract with seven digits on it. What kind of toxic sludge are these agents feeding these kids that've never seen that much money in their lives? You're a 21 year old kid. How much do you need? Especially in a short term bridge contract. I'd tell my agent to calm his horses and just sign the damn thing. If you really believe you're that good, you don't need the huge dollars now to know you'll earn it later.
djsFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to djsFlames For This Useful Post:
Old 09-18-2014, 03:06 PM   #28
bubbsy
Franchise Player
 
bubbsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Exp:
Default

If similar players that can be used as comparisons (duchene, e. kane, skinner, couture, subban, etc) are to be used as precedent, there are 2 types of 2nd contracts for high acheiving youngsters:
1) 2 years at about 3 million
2) 6 years at about 6 million

Now if we take the salary cap today vs what it was a few years ago when those were signed, and inflate these numbers based on the increase in the cap, those numbers should be higher.

the cap in 2011 (before the lockout) was 64 million, and the cap today is 69. That's a % increase of about 7.8%.

so based on that, 2 years @ 3.24 million or 6 years @ 6.5million.

how the heck did the player/agent get 2 years at 6 million (as has been reported)?!?!
bubbsy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2014, 03:26 PM   #29
Hackey
Franchise Player
 
Hackey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DOOM View Post
Maybe when the cap was lower, but with it being 69 million and likely going up, makes him worth 4.5 or so for a bridge deal, IMO.
I read it wrong. 6 per is more than fair. 6 over 2 years is a bit on the lower end.
Hackey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2014, 03:34 PM   #30
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by T@T View Post
I don't know how you can blame players not wanting a bridge deal anymore, just look up north.
Just look out east; PK signed a bridge deal, and two years later he got $72 million. He wanted $49 originally. Now, factoring in his bridge contract, he gets closer to $76.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Badgers Nose View Post
IMO this is the kind of guy that warrants an offer sheet. Surprised no one has bitten.
Look at it from the other teams' perspective though. At what point does CBJ go 'here, have him'? It's probably an offer north of 7M a year.

If you're a rival GM, do you want to give up 4 1st round picks for Ryan Johansen? Even if he becomes the player you hope he is, four years without a 1st is devastating in a cap world.
__________________
”All you have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to you.”

Rowan Roy W-M - February 15, 2024

Last edited by GreenLantern2814; 09-18-2014 at 03:38 PM.
GreenLantern2814 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GreenLantern2814 For This Useful Post:
Old 09-18-2014, 03:44 PM   #31
Anduril
Franchise Player
 
Anduril's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenLantern2814 View Post

Look at it from the other teams' perspective though. At what point does CBJ go 'here, have him'? It's probably an offer north of 7M a year.

If you're a rival GM, do you want to give up 4 1st round picks for Ryan Johansen? Even if he becomes the player you hope he is, four years without a 1st is devastating in a cap world.
Definitely doesn't make sense for almost any team to do it. For those who could afford to give up 4 years of 1st round pick like the Kings, cap is an issue that could end up hurting you even more.
Anduril is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2014, 03:54 PM   #32
Five-hole
Franchise Player
 
Five-hole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The C-spot
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenLantern2814 View Post
Just look out east; PK signed a bridge deal, and two years later he got $72 million. He wanted $49 originally. Now, factoring in his bridge contract, he gets closer to $76.



Look at it from the other teams' perspective though. At what point does CBJ go 'here, have him'? It's probably an offer north of 7M a year.

If you're a rival GM, do you want to give up 4 1st round picks for Ryan Johansen? Even if he becomes the player you hope he is, four years without a 1st is devastating in a cap world.
I dunno. Do you give up Jankowski, Baertschi, Poirier and Klimchuk for Johansen? I might, depending on what my team was like. I don't think the Flames should given prospect depth is basically the only thing we have going on right now, but a 35-35-70 big center at his age is a tough asset to come by.

If you're a team looking to pick in the 20-30 range for the next four years I think you take a long look at it. Especially given that, if you're the GM, by the time the lack of first rounders may actually bite you in the ass, you've probably moved on to another team.
Five-hole is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Five-hole For This Useful Post:
Old 09-18-2014, 04:15 PM   #33
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Five-hole View Post
I dunno. Do you give up Jankowski, Baertschi, Poirier and Klimchuk for Johansen? I might, depending on what my team was like. I don't think the Flames should given prospect depth is basically the only thing we have going on right now, but a 35-35-70 big center at his age is a tough asset to come by.

If you're a team looking to pick in the 20-30 range for the next four years I think you take a long look at it. Especially given that, if you're the GM, by the time the lack of first rounders may actually bite you in the ass, you've probably moved on to another team.
Any team that can afford to part with the picks likely doesn't have the cap room to add another 7M player. Any offer lower than 7 is likely matched by Columbus anyway, since they're already offering 6/$36, and the most any other team can do is extend that by a year.

So all an offer sheet does is alienate the management of Columbus, and when a team actually needs a piece from the Jackets, they can go pound sand.

I'd have to look long and hard at those four guys for Johansen if I'm the Flames. I think they're all going to be terrific players though, and I don't really think now is the time to sacrifice all your prospect depth. That day will come, regardless. If it happens to be used on Ryan Johansen so be it, but I'd like him to have proven more first.
__________________
”All you have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to you.”

Rowan Roy W-M - February 15, 2024
GreenLantern2814 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2014, 04:15 PM   #34
MissTeeks
Franchise Player
 
MissTeeks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Aaron Portzline@Aportzline22s

New proposal received. New proposal rejected. No progress. Onward. #joeywatch #CBJ
__________________
The Quest stands upon the edge of a knife. Stray but a little, and it will fail, to the ruin of all. Yet hope remains while the Company is true. Go Flames Go!

Pain heals. Chicks dig scars. Glory... lasts forever.
MissTeeks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2014, 04:18 PM   #35
Oling_Roachinen
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by djsFlames View Post
I'd be in awe if anyone threw me a contract with seven digits on it. What kind of toxic sludge are these agents feeding these kids that've never seen that much money in their lives? You're a 21 year old kid. How much do you need? Especially in a short term bridge contract. I'd tell my agent to calm his horses and just sign the damn thing. If you really believe you're that good, you don't need the huge dollars now to know you'll earn it later.
I really disagree with a lot of the sentiment in this post. While I'm sure everyone on this board would be happy to take 7 figures and play hockey, the discussion should be about what Johansen is worth and not how much he "needs". Just because some kids in China are making pennies a day doesn't mean I should be happy taking a 10k yearly salary.

He's the franchise player of an NHL team, the same NHL that is bringing in billions of dollars of revenue a year, he should be paid accordingly to his worth. I think there's a definite argument about whether he is 'worth' closer to 3.5M or 6.5M but I don't agree that he should just accept anything and be happy to play in the NHL at all.
Oling_Roachinen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2014, 04:28 PM   #36
Parallex
I believe in the Jays.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenLantern2814 View Post
Look at it from the other teams' perspective though. At what point does CBJ go 'here, have him'? It's probably an offer north of 7M a year.

If you're a rival GM, do you want to give up 4 1st round picks for Ryan Johansen?
That (7Mish per year) would be two 1st, one 2nd, one 3rd round draft pick. If you further adjust it down to just the 6.5 he's asking for (and the Jackets are seemingly unwilling to pay) the compensation becomes a 1st, 2nd, and 3rd.

If that's the case (that the Jackets would match any offer up to north of 7M) then their (CBJ) current posture is silly. If they're willing to pay him north of 7M per on an offer sheet then they should be willing to pay more then 3M on a SPC.

I think if I were a contending team that had the cap space (and all my own draft picks for rounds 1-3) I'd throw him an offer sheet. He's probably better then whoever I'd draft at those lower slots. Of course You'll have a hard time finding a contending team with both all their own draft picks and the cap space.
Parallex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2014, 04:28 PM   #37
BergyBoy
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Badgers Nose View Post
IMO this is the kind of guy that warrants an offer sheet. Surprised no one has bitten.
I totally agree based on what would need to be given, sounds like it's somewhere around 12M/2 years

Cap Hit of offer sheet Draft Pick Compensation
$1,110,249 or below None
Over $1,110,249 to $1,682,194 Third-round pick
Over $1,682,194 to $3,364,391 Second-round pick
Over $3,364,391 to $5,046,585 First-round and third-round pick
Over $5,046,585 to $6,728,781 First-round, second-round and third-round pick
BergyBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to BergyBoy For This Useful Post:
Old 09-18-2014, 04:30 PM   #38
Jacks
Franchise Player
 
Jacks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Five-hole View Post
I dunno. Do you give up Jankowski, Baertschi, Poirier and Klimchuk for Johansen? I might, depending on what my team was like.
They have to be your own picks. It would be more like Baertschi, 2012 14th overall, Monahan and Bennett.
Jacks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2014, 04:31 PM   #39
Five-hole
Franchise Player
 
Five-hole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The C-spot
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacks View Post
They have to be your own picks. It would be more like Baertschi, 2012 14th overall, Monahan and Bennett.
I realize that. I listed first round selections we've made that were picks in the range that a team who would realistically make an offer sheet for Johansen would be picking in.
Five-hole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2014, 04:33 PM   #40
Jacks
Franchise Player
 
Jacks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Gotcha, just assumed you were talking about us.

I can't see an offer sheet being worth it for any team. You have to overpay the player to get him to sign and then mortgage your draft future on top of that. Johansen hasn't proven enough to take that risk IMO.
Jacks is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:33 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy