09-08-2014, 08:59 PM
|
#21
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
|
Gaudreau should be 99
|
|
|
|
09-08-2014, 09:05 PM
|
#22
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: St. George's, Grenada
|
Keep in mind I remember ea said something about ratings working differently and being weighted in a different way. So comparing them to previous years isn't a good benchmark
|
|
|
|
|
09-08-2014, 09:05 PM
|
#23
|
|
First Line Centre
|
What is the point of no editing.... Almost makes me not think about new gen
|
|
|
|
|
09-09-2014, 07:01 AM
|
#24
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Calgary
|
Wotherspoon and Arnold are both 74 and agostino is 71
|
|
|
|
09-09-2014, 07:49 AM
|
#25
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Most of those ratings seem really high for the 3rd worst team in the league. Everyone is just about overrated except Brodie, who is criminally underrated.
|
|
|
|
|
09-09-2014, 08:07 AM
|
#26
|
|
First Line Centre
|
EA doesn't seem to spend many resources on rosters. Every season the ratings are way off and every season the rosters are off. Disappointing
|
|
|
|
|
09-09-2014, 08:15 AM
|
#27
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kehatch
EA doesn't seem to spend many resources on anything related to the NHL series. Every season is like a patch on the previous game. Disappointing
|
fyp
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to secol For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
09-09-2014, 10:16 AM
|
#28
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geeoff
Most of those ratings seem really high for the 3rd worst team in the league. Everyone is just about overrated except Brodie, who is criminally underrated.
|
Backlund could be 84, gio should be 88 and hudler is fine
|
|
|
|
|
09-09-2014, 10:17 AM
|
#29
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Calgary
|
Byron is a 77 not a 78
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to savardandjokinen For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
09-09-2014, 12:16 PM
|
#30
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Calgary
|
For the first time ever I'm actually pretty happy with the rankings.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to N-E-B For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
09-09-2014, 01:40 PM
|
#31
|
|
Backup Goalie
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp: 
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TSXCman
Keep in mind these ratings aren't averages. I think they are how much of the player type attributes are full. Eg. Defensive dman is going to be low if he can't hit or poke, but may still have high skating, passing etc.
So they always seem out of whack.
|
I believe they changed that, and made it just an average in NHL 14.
|
|
|
|
|
09-09-2014, 03:34 PM
|
#32
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Calgary
|
Can't wait to play gm as this team!
|
|
|
|
|
09-09-2014, 03:46 PM
|
#33
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by savardandjokinen
Can't wait to play gm as this team!
|
Don't get your hopes up too much. The game is very underdeveloped and missing a lot of features even in game modes that are offered.
|
|
|
|
|
09-09-2014, 03:50 PM
|
#34
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gilligans_off
Don't get your hopes up too much. The game is very underdeveloped and missing a lot of features even in game modes that are offered.
|
That's for xbox one and ps4. I have a 360 which gm is apparently suppost to be really good
|
|
|
|
|
09-09-2014, 03:51 PM
|
#35
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Marseilles Of The Prairies
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wastedyouth
I see we are at annual "get bent out of shape because of video game ratings" time of the year again.
Right on!
|
He said after a year on the forum.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm
Settle down there, Temple Grandin.
|
|
|
|
|
|
09-09-2014, 03:53 PM
|
#36
|
|
Franchise Player
|
um...shouldnt this be in the gaming section or something? Its not "really" news is it?
|
|
|
|
|
09-10-2014, 07:17 PM
|
#37
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheese
um...shouldnt this be in the gaming section or something? Its not "really" news is it?
|
I guess so but it doesn't really matter
|
|
|
|
|
09-10-2014, 10:46 PM
|
#38
|
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jg13
Highest to Lowest:
Giordano-87. Spot on, deserved to rise.
Hiller-87. Unsure.
Hudler-85. Up 2, good decision I think.
Glencross-85. Not sure how he's risen after a poor year.
Raymond-85. Unsure.
Ramo-85. Glad to see he's risen, but don't think he's an 84. 80 would have been fair.
Monahan-84. Deserved to rise, but not sure he's an 84. 80-82 is ok.
Setoguchi-84. Unsure.
Wideman-84. Stays the same, about right.
Stajan-83. Up 2, not sure about that.
Jones-83. Poor year, rises 1. Go figure.
Backlund-82. Up 2, thats fine.
Smid-82. Up 1, about right.
Brodie-81. Too low.
Russell-80. About right.
Colborne-80. About right.
Bollig-79. Unsure.
Byron-78. Good to see him boosted up from a pitiful 72.
Baertschi-78. About right.
Engelland-78. Unsure.
Bouma-77. About right.
Gaudreau-76. About right, as long as his potential is high.
Mcgrattan-74. Up 5, much better
|
All things considered, I'm pretty happy with these ratings. I altered mine in 14 with what I genuinely considered to be their accurate ratings. I'd say, despite it looking on paper like our players have risen despite being rubbish, that for once, I'm happy with almost all the ratings and I don't think they have undersold any of our players, bar Brodie.
Be interesting to see what ratings they give for the Adironack lads like Granlund, Klimchuk and such. Would also like to see Bennetts rating too.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:00 PM.
|
|
